Welcome to MaxCheaters.com

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads

Code Anti-Bot Protection For L2J


Recommended Posts

So I decided to share anti-bot protection for l2 servers based on java. Based on aCis older rev, you need to do some adaps for the newer ones.

 

Anti-Bot.java

http://pastebin.com/YjgMENce

 

DDSConverter.java 

http://pastebin.com/E8xQZTdi

I'll update features of it today.

 

Update:

Here's the feature list: http://maxcheaters.com/forum/index.php?topic=269034.msg2550979#msg2550979

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

rarely but i agree with xdem. This protection is also annoying because imagine you need to rr in the middle of siege the last thing you want is to write a stupid captcha in the middle of a huge teamfight but nice try really

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rarely but i agree with xdem. This protection is also annoying because imagine you need to rr in the middle of siege the last thing you want is to write a stupid captcha in the middle of a huge teamfight but nice try really

 

It's not his try, captcha anti-bots where arround since ages, nevermore made it long time ago

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pure crap.

 

Captcha sounds pro on l2 but with a dds converter and some if statements you make it. I agree with kderd this is [Hot] and should not be hided for 1 karma but for 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not his try, captcha anti-bots where arround since ages, nevermore made it long time ago

 

didnt knew that, the idea can be good when you think about it altho the character PIN thats implemented since high5 is the same but in a much better version of this i think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This protection is also annoying because imagine you need to rr in the middle of siege the last thing you want is to write a stupid captcha in the middle of a huge teamfight but nice try really

 

No, not rly. I've talked with KderD and he told me that it has some 'protection', when you do pew pew it's not poping up, just while farm or something like that :)

 

"you need to rr in the middle of siege" - bot detected? :troll:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not rly. I've talked with KderD and he told me that it has some 'protection', when you do pew pew it's not poping up, just while farm or something like that :)

 

"you need to rr in the middle of siege" - bot detected? :troll:

 

but than it becomes pointless, i just enter normally ask someone to start a pvp rr log back with bot done :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

rarely but i agree with xdem. This protection is also annoying because imagine you need to rr in the middle of siege the last thing you want is to write a stupid captcha in the middle of a huge teamfight but nice try really

Thats not true! Its a middle solution for people who can't afford lameguard or client side protection! In adittion using my anti-bot (captcha like) you can config it to work only with spesific mobs ( only at farm zones ) or even make some npc's dont count as kills ! Chance of poping-up can also be by chance. I mean for every kill there will be x chance(5% for example) of poping up the captcha system!

Moreover we all know that there was and there still exists by-passes for lameguard and client sides protections!

So yes theres a good share!

Keep it up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats not true! Its a middle solution for people who can't afford lameguard or client side protection! In adittion using my anti-bot (captcha like) you can config it to work only with spesific mobs ( only at farm zones ) or even make some npc's dont count as kills ! Chance of poping-up can also be by chance. I mean for every kill there will be x chance(5% for example) of poping up the captcha system!

Moreover we all know that there was and there still exists by-passes for lameguard and client sides protections!

So yes theres a good share!

Keep it up!

 

yes thats better but still i prefer to have the onlogin PIN code, its just less an annoyance and its more efficent, also when it comes to protection nobody will have bulletprrof protection unless packet obfuscation comes in to play thats why i think things like lameguard and client side protections are inefficent and bypassable :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes thats better but still i prefer to have the onlogin PIN code, its just less an annoyance and its more efficent, also when it comes to protection nobody will have bulletprrof protection unless packet obfuscation comes in to play thats why i think things like lameguard and client side protections are inefficent and bypassable :)

Indeed! Our project(l2jreunion) have the pin code system implemented :D Also we made some hardcoded changes at packets and we made a system that will be able to block anti-bot programs ( at the moment blocks only L2Net and L2phx. We face problem with l2tower ) I will announce more when we are ready ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.