Jump to content

mcrabben7

Members
  • Posts

    43
  • Credits

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by mcrabben7

  1. Admins are not from Supreme (now Azure L2). They have no anti-bot protection. Almost everyone has a working bot there.
  2. Since the source is there, it's easy to bypass the Bake-Ice startup checks. Use your brain and recompile it with a few small changes.
  3. There is a working Pet Dupe still out there, and not even Depmax has it fully patched.
  4. DepmaX64 does not have any specific anti-bot protections added. I know the guy who made it. Maybe one of the exploit fixes also blocked the bot.
  5. ADAL13, if you can see the text WITHOUT changing the packet (ignoring the default L2 encryption) then it's not encrypted. I haven't taken the time to study BakeIce at all, but from what I know, it's does an Auth procedure to let you login, perhaps requests and sends a new auth token, scans your computer for bad programs, and then patches the client Auth connection to let you communicate with the login server. It'd be interesting to see TurkSauron's BakeIce code :P Maybe one of these days I will examine BakeIce under a debugger when I have time ;) It would be an interesting adventure.
  6. Wow, they don't even encrypt the server packets. Amateurs.
  7. It's a server-side protection engine. You can't exploit a server-side protection engine unless it has a buffer overflow vulnerability, a bug in some of it's code, or doesn't fix a specific exploit. You guys are funny. Fr3DBr works with me, and he's a good guy :P I don't think he made any serious bugs in it.
  8. No. Check out the donations page for information.
  9. But it wasn't 18/54, it was different numbers, so I wasn't lying or wrong. You contradict yourself.
  10. Meh. The auth token changer was a quickly coded beta system when we went live. We just never cared enough to really do it correctly. We'll implement a new method shortly, though. It will be fun :P
  11. It doesn't close valid programs, but ok. If you have a folder named "hlapex zomg close me" it will kill explorer. Also, I'm not a Nazi, but keep being immature. My relatives were killed by the Nazis so it's quite a sad insult.
  12. We don't use an 18/54 security so I don't know what patch you are trying to break. Also, unless you show the bot actually "leveling" it doesn't prove jack shit. Either way, new patch incoming soon.
  13. You're such a liar. I bet you used a normal L2Walker IG without any modifications, too, right? You're funny.
  14. Join :P You'll have a good time here :)
  15. It'll be up by October at the very latest. Such a pessimist Everythinginbutter.
  16. Cause I wrote it :P Actually, rootkits aren't really that hard to get around if you're still running them inside the same Windows process space. If you can see me, I can see you.
  17. I helped L2Revenge with their new OOG protections and client protections. You won't get OOG to work unless you're a very clever person. A normal L2Walker will never work.
  18. I didn't give L2P shit so no they won't.
  19. Glad you're having fun with my security system :) Yes j1ve you can get IG walker to load if you're clever, but it will still never, ever work. The protection has many layers, and it goes beyond just simple "detection" and "closing" of programs. Next patch will even had a few extra little tricks :)
×
×
  • Create New...