MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord

Top.MaxCheaters.com is now OPEN – Lineage 2 Top Listing

Your announcement here - click to advertise

Rin4A's Scheme Buffer Fully Working Updated To Highfive

Followers

Squirtle

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
93 posts
0 Badges
116,066 Member No
28/07/2012 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 9.56%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 4,780 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #3,118

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Bern Kansas

April 15, 201313 yr

Like the title states, Fully working 100% for the latest revisions of L2j (as of April 1st I'm 100%, not sure of before that)

No ss because they are in the download file, so here it is, hope you guys enjoy!!

Rin4a's Updated to Hi5 (Updated as of April 28th 2013)

Credits: Rin4a for the original Buffer, Allen for some of the adaption work up to Freya, Me for adapting it properly to Hi5.

I also have ones working for freya still, PM me if you need!

roko91

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
51 posts
3 Badges
68,299 Member No
22/02/2010 Joined

Lv. 12 Novice

EXP 0.90%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 3,810 / 4,685
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #6,554

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Current Mood:
Gender: Male
Country:

April 15, 201313 yr

Its perfect. Ty :)

Dragic

Administrators

Offline Status
Administrators Group
1.1k posts
1 Solutions
11 Badges
101,275 Member No
08/09/2011 Joined

Lv. 25 1st Class Adept

EXP 12.80%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: D-Grade
EXP: 25,055 / 27,274
Next grade: Lv. 40
Quests: 8 / 13
Rank: #178

Awards3

Veteran
Scribe
Hunter

100% 2 0 0

Current Mood:
Gender: Male
Country:
Location: Athens

April 19, 201313 yr

Put some images for know the people what they download...

`Heroin

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
2k posts
0 Badges
104,678 Member No
20/11/2011 Joined

Lv. 26 1st Class Adept

EXP 74.70%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: D-Grade
EXP: 29,285 / 29,966
Next grade: Lv. 40
Quests: 6 / 13
Rank: #138

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Current Mood:
Gender: Male
Country:

April 19, 201313 yr

What did you update exactly, because i think it was working on high five without modifications

Squirtle

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
93 posts
0 Badges
116,066 Member No
28/07/2012 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 9.56%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 4,780 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #3,118

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Bern Kansas

April 20, 201313 yr

Author

updates include working PET Buffs, pet buffs from Rin4a's v1.3 DO NOT work on HighFive clients/servers (Along with most pet buffers from freya client/server [Changed some of the code to work correctly]) Instead of when choosing cubics saying (When no spirit ore in inv) "You Need 11 No Name" Says "You Need 11 Spirit Ore" Changed buffer appearance for my server and Some of the HTMLs Generated by Quest Caused Back button to appear underneath other buffs (fixed)

Squirtle

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
93 posts
0 Badges
116,066 Member No
28/07/2012 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 9.56%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 4,780 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #3,118

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Bern Kansas

April 20, 201313 yr

Author

Put some images for know the people what they download...

No ss because they are in the download file.....

Mastercry

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
12 posts
3 Badges
127,177 Member No
05/04/2013 Joined

Lv. 11 Novice

EXP 54.05%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 3,445 / 3,802
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #14,516

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

April 22, 201313 yr

ayta einai buffs :P ,thanks

cheatax21

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
247 posts
0 Badges
22,257 Member No
11/06/2008 Joined

Lv. 15 Novice

EXP 25.55%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 7,095 / 8,004
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #1,364

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

April 24, 201313 yr

Squirtle i have some issues with the buffer.

1) the Back button is still behind the buffs.

2)In schemes, when im going to add buffs, it shows only one buff per page, all other buffs are behind it not below it.

Can fix this?

kender1000

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
5 posts
0 Badges
127,732 Member No
22/04/2013 Joined

Lv. 11 Novice

EXP 45.04%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 3,375 / 3,802
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #19,113

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

April 25, 201313 yr

cheatax21

1) the Back button is still behind the buffs.

2)In schemes, when im going to add buffs, it shows only one buff per page, all other buffs are behind it not below it.

Exactly, fix it please :'( It is first npc buffer which works for me...

Squirtle

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
93 posts
0 Badges
116,066 Member No
28/07/2012 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 9.56%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 4,780 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #3,118

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Bern Kansas

April 28, 201313 yr

Author

Modified first post with updated link and few more fixes to buffer. Good Luck and Have Fun!!

HappyViolence

Banned

Offline Status
Banned Group
1.1k posts
0 Badges
110,400 Member No
13/04/2012 Joined

Lv. 22 1st Class Adept

EXP 97.26%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: D-Grade
EXP: 20,010 / 20,068
Next grade: Lv. 40
Quests: 6 / 13
Rank: #252

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male

April 28, 201313 yr

Edit:

I see that You reupload dead link.

Squirtle

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
93 posts
0 Badges
116,066 Member No
28/07/2012 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 9.56%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 4,780 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #3,118

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Bern Kansas

April 28, 201313 yr

Author

Edit:

I see that You reupload dead link.

Link works... files work... TY for Unlock >.>

kender1000

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
5 posts
0 Badges
127,732 Member No
22/04/2013 Joined

Lv. 11 Novice

EXP 45.04%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 3,375 / 3,802
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #19,113

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

April 28, 201313 yr

Ok, i changed old files to new and... it don't work

ZaNteR

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
1k posts
1 Solutions
9 Badges
13,359 Member No
06/09/2007 Joined

Lv. 23 1st Class Adept

EXP 10.26%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: D-Grade
EXP: 20,300 / 22,328
Next grade: Lv. 40
Quests: 6 / 13
Rank: #247

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Country:

April 28, 201313 yr

Also what about unclosed connections? This buffer always suffered from this.

Dante44®

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
1k posts
5 Solutions
8 Badges
108,607 Member No
28/02/2012 Joined

Lv. 22 1st Class Adept

EXP 79.57%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: D-Grade
EXP: 19,635 / 20,068
Next grade: Lv. 40
Quests: 6 / 13
Rank: #269

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

100% 3 0 0

Current Mood:
Gender: Male
Country:
Location: Greece

April 28, 201313 yr

Link works... files work... TY for Unlock >.>

Link is dead

Invalid or Deleted File.

The key you provided for file download was invalid. This is usually caused because the file is no longer stored on MediaFire. This occurs when the file is removed by the originating user or MediaFire.

Still have questions, or think we've made a mistake? Please contact support for further assistance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Followers

Go to topic listing

Replies 66
Views 35k
Created 13 yr13 yr
Last Reply 10 yr10 yr

Popular Days

Survivors of Lineage (A Vampire Survivors-style game on L2)

Finally, someone putting AI to good use!

This is exactly what I like to see. Someone taking an idea, using the tools available to bring it to life, and actually delivering a playable game instead of endlessly talking about what AI can or cannot do.

26 heroes, 42 weapons, 8 maps, character progression, leaderboards, and even daily challenges. That's quite a lot of work for a side project.

More importantly, you've taken the Lineage 2 universe and done something different with it, rather than creating yet another private server.

AI doesn't magically make a good game. You still need ideas, direction, creativity, and the ability to put everything together into something enjoyable.

Great work, Elfo! Keep developing it. It's refreshing to see something original coming out of this community for a change.

By Atumenos · 39 minutes ago39 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Again: Tell me the name of your pack and let's see how secure it is. It's unfair that public packs get all the blame since they are in the forefront of exposure. Name of the pack, source or jar location and I'm happy to waste my tokens on yours to help the community with fixes. After all I dont need them anywhere else, I'm a bus driver.

It's funny how when you run out of arguments, you start with the insults on my occupation.

If your pack is SO secure, you have nothing to afraid from a bus driver with a Claude Max subscription. Name the pack, I'm waiting.

By aguy · 48 minutes ago48 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Six months of asking Claude questions doesn't make you a security expert. You're confusing AI-generated findings with actual engineering knowledge.

Experienced developers build, maintain, and fix entire projects. You make accusations without providing verifiable evidence.

Enough attention-seeking. Go back to driving and leave software development to people who actually understand it.

By Atumenos · 50 minutes ago50 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

It's correct that at the right hands these tools can augment visibility and tracing of issues. But only if your priority is to look for these issues. The problem is that nobody seems to be looking. AI won't magically tell you once you open a random context, hey you have race condition there, an invalid state there, a threadlock there. It needs investigation.

So far the evidence we have from the open source packs is that their developers are not activelly looking. Check my other thread about how to dupe adena in L2JMobius. Confirmed exploit ingame, 2 lines patch, he didn't even bother to fix it. Previous exploit about adena dupe in his pack, same thing, reported exploit, reproduced, patch shared, only applied it after enough pressure and countless of arguments with his team so as they finally get to understand how it works.

Now regarding patching and contributing. The nature of patching and contributing has changed. It's more valuable to investigate, prompt the right questions and instructions, find and validate an issue, than sharing the patch. The patch is easy to generate once the exploit is shared. Some people operate under the assumption that we will hand-feed them PR requests for issues they have caused themselves.

You are wrong to believe that AI tools will make the code more secure. Here's where we disagree. The tools are only good for what you use them for. Most people use them to prototype things, get them to "just work". There's tons of new code created this way every day, that simply there's not enough manpower to use the AI tools to do security analysis.

To put it simpler:

If 10 people use AI to make features and only 2 look for security in them, the 2 will get simply overwhelmed. It's only nature. Thats the reason we are entering a bad phase for security, it's not the quality of the AI tools, but hte priorities people seem to have with them.

AGAIN: if you are so sure that your pack is secure, tell us its name so as we can audit it. Hiding behind anonymity so as only the open source projects take the bullet is not a proof of security.

By aguy · 54 minutes ago54 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

There is something fundamentally contradictory about your entire argument.

You claim that AI has become so powerful that it can uncover vulnerabilities experienced developers have overlooked for years. At the same time, you argue that these same AI tools are going to destroy software security because developers are incapable of using them properly.

You seem to have missed the most important part: AI does not exclusively benefit people looking for vulnerabilities. It also benefits the people identifying, understanding, preventing, and fixing them.

Modern AI systems can analyze large codebases, trace execution paths across multiple classes, identify missing validation, examine trust boundaries, suggest architectural improvements, generate regression tests, and assist with reviewing complex changes. These capabilities are available to defenders just as they are to attackers.

And unlike the picture you are trying to paint, experienced developers do not suddenly become irrelevant because someone with an AI subscription can ask questions about source code. Quite the opposite. Developers who understand their systems can use these tools with significantly more context, evaluate their conclusions, recognize false positives, and implement changes without introducing regressions elsewhere.

AI is a force multiplier, not a replacement for engineering judgment.

You also appear to misunderstand what constitutes a verified security vulnerability.

An AI identifying a suspicious method is not proof of an exploit. A plausible attack scenario is not proof that the attack succeeds. Even a proposed patch is not necessarily proof that the original code was vulnerable.

A proper security finding requires an identifiable failure, a reproducible scenario, an understanding of its actual impact, and verification that the proposed correction addresses the underlying problem.

None of that becomes optional simply because an AI generated the analysis.

You have repeatedly claimed to have discovered an extraordinary number of vulnerabilities affecting virtually every available project. You have also accused developers of incompetence, questioned their priorities, and suggested that they charge people for security improvements that supposedly do not exist.

These are substantial accusations, yet you expect them to be accepted without independently verifiable evidence.

You are free to withhold exploit details. Nobody is asking you to publish instructions that could harm running servers. But withholding evidence also means accepting that others cannot independently validate your conclusions.

What is particularly interesting is your assumption that developers working on gameplay accuracy must therefore be neglecting security.

Software development does not operate according to that false choice. Gameplay correctness, protocol validation, stability, performance, architecture, and security can all be addressed as part of ongoing maintenance. A commit correcting a skill formula tells you absolutely nothing, by itself, about the security knowledge or priorities of its author.

There is another point worth considering.

If AI has enabled you to discover problems that you could not previously identify, that demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted development. It does not establish that the developers maintaining these projects lack competence.

In fact, your own experience supports the opposite conclusion from the one you are promoting: AI is making sophisticated code analysis more accessible. The same technology can help developers discover weaknesses earlier, investigate them faster, and systematically improve code quality.

Naturally, AI-generated code requires review and testing. So does human-written code. Neither has a monopoly on mistakes, and neither deserves blind trust.

The meaningful distinction is between disciplined engineering and careless engineering, not between human development and AI-assisted development.

Finally, repeatedly announcing that the entire community is heading toward catastrophe contributes nothing measurable to its security.

If you possess verified findings, those findings have technical value. If you choose not to disclose them, that is your decision. But the absence of disclosed evidence cannot be turned into evidence that everyone else is incompetent.

AI has changed what individuals can accomplish in software engineering. It has not changed the burden of proof.

And perhaps the greatest irony here is that the technology you credit with making you capable of discovering vulnerabilities is the very same technology you underestimate when it is placed in the hands of developers who understand the systems they maintain.

The future of software security will not be determined by who can generate the most alarming forum post.

It will be determined by who can turn increasingly powerful tools into verified, reliable, and maintainable software improvements.

By Atumenos · 1 hour ago1 hr

Rin4A's Scheme Buffer Fully Working Updated To Highfive

Featured Replies

Create an account or sign in to comment

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posts

Survivors of Lineage (A Vampire Survivors-style game on L2)

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Topics

[L2OFF] CLExt Gracia Final P110 — Alpha/Beta

L2 TORCH X15 H5 SUB ACU BASE +3

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

[Share]korean protocol 606 new lobby collection

Looking for a Serious Lineage II Project Partner / Co-Owner

Group Legend

Who Was Online

Important Information

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)

Chrome (Desktop)

Safari (iOS 16.4+)

Safari (macOS)

Edge (Android)

Edge (Desktop)

Firefox (Android)

Firefox (Desktop)