MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord

Top.MaxCheaters.com is now OPEN – Lineage 2 Top Listing

Your announcement here - click to advertise

[L2OFF] L2Giants

Followers

l2giants

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
23 posts
0 Badges
87,981 Member No
17/02/2011 Joined

Lv. 11 Novice

EXP 74.64%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 3,605 / 3,802
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #9,365

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

March 3, 201115 yr

500+ online

Server Specifications

- EXP/SP: 30x

- Adena: 60x

- Drop Rate: 10x

- Spoil: 10x

- Main quests with 3x drop ammount

- B-Grade Weapons/Armors in Giran Luxury Shop for Adena

- 1st and 2nd Class Quest items in Giran Luxury Shop: 150k/1kk

- 3rd class is 100% retail

- MP Pots: 300MP / 10 secs reuse / 10k each in Groceries

- HP Pots: Retail

- CP Pots: Retail

- Sieges: Every 2 Weeks (half saturday and the remaining at sunday)

- Olympiad Period: 2 Weeks

- Enchant Rate: Retail

- Raids Respawn Time: 12+2

- Barakiel Respawn Time: 6+2

- Epics Respawn Time: Retail+2

- Buff slots: 24+4

- Auto Learn Skills: Yes

Features

Offline Shops

Simply use the command /offline_shop

Subclass Stack System

- Perfectly balanced

- You don't get double masteries (Ex: Light Armor Mastery of both classes)

- You can Stack a class to your main class

- You can Stack a class to your first subclass retail

- You can only stack a class from your own race. There's an exception for Dwarf Race, that can stack any race/class.

Spirit System

When you kill someone in a PVP you collect his spirit, if you get 5 spirits you'll get 200points from each one. Then you can use a skill called Release Spirits to fill your hp/mp/cp

JOIN US NOW - WWW.L2GIANTS.COM

mmytza

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
575 posts
3 Badges
60,677 Member No
11/10/2009 Joined

Lv. 17 Novice

EXP 72.06%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 10,400 / 10,809
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #617

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male

March 3, 201115 yr

- MP Pots: 300MP / 10 secs reuse / 10k each Giran Grocery

I couldent find them ^^ ( are you speaking about elixirs?!)

and if you added B grade items you can also add BSSD SSD and so on .. not? :D

anyway ... server is realy nice and have many players at start :D

Beseventh

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
193 posts
0 Badges
18,427 Member No
15/03/2008 Joined

Lv. 14 Novice

EXP 52.21%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 6,255 / 6,783
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #1,833

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

March 3, 201115 yr

Why not normal mode ... i hate sub stacks :S

mmytza

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
575 posts
3 Badges
60,677 Member No
11/10/2009 Joined

Lv. 17 Novice

EXP 72.06%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 10,400 / 10,809
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #617

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male

March 3, 201115 yr

Why not normal mode ... i hate sub stacks :S

hate substack ... dont play .. lol

it's great .. no buffers no gm shop and with substack :X

CryStaliN

Legendary Member

Offline Status
Legendary Member Group
5.2k posts
3 Badges
50,108 Member No
22/04/2009 Joined

Lv. 36 1st Class Adept

EXP 93.17%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: D-Grade
EXP: 65,145 / 65,437
Next grade: Lv. 40
Quests: 7 / 13
Rank: #28

Awards3

Veteran
Scribe
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Current Mood:
Gender: Male
Country:
Location: REDWOOD ORIGINAL

March 3, 201115 yr

I couldent find them ^^ ( are you speaking about elixirs?!)

and if you added B grade items you can also add BSSD SSD and so on .. not? :D

anyway ... server is realy nice and have many players at start :D

The server started well..i heard a lot of guys complaining about the SSD (Well its a 30x server not a 3000x one,what they want a gm shop??)

Why not normal mode ... i hate sub stacks :S

You should join dont judge a server after a small thing,you'll love it i can bet it ya.

JOIN !!

PS:You should try it isnt like the others sub-stack fail servers l2j'ones,it reminds me of a great community (DN).

Awesome work guys keep doing your best in order to maintain the server up !

Beseventh

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
193 posts
0 Badges
18,427 Member No
15/03/2008 Joined

Lv. 14 Novice

EXP 52.21%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 6,255 / 6,783
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #1,833

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

March 3, 201115 yr

The server started well..i heard a lot of guys complaining about the SSD (Well its a 30x server not a 3000x one,what they want a gm shop??)

You should join dont judge a server after a small thing,you'll love it i can bet it ya.

JOIN !!

PS:You should try it isnt like the others sub-stack fail servers l2j'ones,it reminds me of a great community (DN).

Awesome work guys keep doing your best in order to maintain the server up !

Maybe its ur style Crystalin, but not and mine :P

CryStaliN

Legendary Member

Offline Status
Legendary Member Group
5.2k posts
3 Badges
50,108 Member No
22/04/2009 Joined

Lv. 36 1st Class Adept

EXP 93.17%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: D-Grade
EXP: 65,145 / 65,437
Next grade: Lv. 40
Quests: 7 / 13
Rank: #28

Awards3

Veteran
Scribe
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Current Mood:
Gender: Male
Country:
Location: REDWOOD ORIGINAL

March 3, 201115 yr

Maybe its ur style Crystalin, but not and mine :P

Atleast give it a try and than tell me how is it..

Everything is awesome the balance between classes,bugs&others. ;)

Diopos

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
419 posts
0 Badges
79,976 Member No
25/09/2010 Joined

Lv. 16 Novice

EXP 34.37%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 8,465 / 9,345
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #907

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Aliveri.

March 3, 201115 yr

I agree with Crystalin,srvr is great tho.

RedmanFTW

Banned

Offline Status
Banned Group
2.9k posts
0 Badges
30,326 Member No
29/09/2008 Joined

Lv. 30 1st Class Adept

EXP 61.34%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: D-Grade
EXP: 40,970 / 42,246
Next grade: Lv. 40
Quests: 7 / 13
Rank: #74

Awards3

Veteran
Scribe
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male

March 4, 201115 yr

good server but too boring

kagkouras

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
374 posts
6 Badges
29,189 Member No
13/09/2008 Joined

Lv. 17 Novice

EXP 3.07%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 9,390 / 10,809
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #727

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: petroupoli

March 4, 201115 yr

good server but too boring

Diopos

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
419 posts
0 Badges
79,976 Member No
25/09/2010 Joined

Lv. 16 Novice

EXP 34.37%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 8,465 / 9,345
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #907

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Aliveri.

March 4, 201115 yr

good server but too boring

Stop playing on LOLPVPJAVASERBAH and ull see that its not boring.

Dupek

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
109 posts
0 Badges
88,712 Member No
23/02/2011 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 55.89%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 5,240 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #2,926

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

March 4, 201115 yr

True xD

Lavos

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
732 posts
0 Badges
39,152 Member No
13/01/2009 Joined

Lv. 18 Novice

EXP 95.09%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 12,320 / 12,398
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #458

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Cluj-Napoca

March 4, 201115 yr

spamm detected , btw this is a failsubstack , that`s why is so empty. QQ

l2giants

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
23 posts
0 Badges
87,981 Member No
17/02/2011 Joined

Lv. 11 Novice

EXP 74.64%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 3,605 / 3,802
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #9,365

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

March 4, 201115 yr

Author

fail substack?

Dupek

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
109 posts
0 Badges
88,712 Member No
23/02/2011 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 55.89%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 5,240 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #2,926

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Not Telling

March 4, 201115 yr

The server is pretty fine and there is lots of ppl. That guy who said it's failed - he grew up playing l2j x1000 server with max enchants 150 and everything above x50 rate is fail for him. Sad story :'(

Create an account or sign in to comment

Followers

Go to topic listing

Replies 104
Views 9.2k
Created 15 yr15 yr
Last Reply 15 yr15 yr

Popular Days

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Again: Tell me the name of your pack and let's see how secure it is. It's unfair that public packs get all the blame since they are in the forefront of exposure. Name of the pack, source or jar location and I'm happy to waste my tokens on yours to help the community with fixes. After all I dont need them anywhere else, I'm a bus driver.

If your pack is SO secure, you have nothing to afraid from a bus driver with a Claude Max subscription. Name the pack, I'm waiting.

By aguy · 8 minutes ago8 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Six months of asking Claude questions doesn't make you a security expert. You're confusing AI-generated findings with actual engineering knowledge.

Experienced developers build, maintain, and fix entire projects. You make accusations without providing verifiable evidence.

Enough attention-seeking. Go back to driving and leave software development to people who actually understand it.

By Atumenos · 10 minutes ago10 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

It's correct that at the right hands these tools can augment visibility and tracing of issues. But only if your priority is to look for these issues. The problem is that nobody seems to be looking. AI won't magically tell you once you open a random context, hey you have race condition there, an invalid state there, a threadlock there. It needs investigation.

So far the evidence we have from the open source packs is that their developers are not activelly looking. Check my other thread about how to dupe adena in L2JMobius. Confirmed exploit ingame, 2 lines patch, he didn't even bother to fix it. Previous exploit about adena dupe in his pack, same thing, reported exploit, reproduced, patch shared, only applied it after enough pressure and countless of arguments with his team so as they finally get to understand how it works.

Now regarding patching and contributing. The nature of patching and contributing has changed. It's more valuable to investigate, prompt the right questions and instructions, find and validate an issue, than sharing the patch. The patch is easy to generate once the exploit is shared. Some people operate under the assumption that we will hand-feed them PR requests for issues they have caused themselves.

You are wrong to believe that AI tools will make the code more secure. Here's where we disagree. The tools are only good for what you use them for. Most people use them to prototype things, get them to "just work". There's tons of new code created this way every day, that simply there's not enough manpower to use the AI tools to do security analysis.

To put it simpler:

If 10 people use AI to make features and only 2 look for security in them, the 2 will get simply overwhelmed. It's only nature. Thats the reason we are entering a bad phase for security, it's not the quality of the AI tools, but hte priorities people seem to have with them.

AGAIN: if you are so sure that your pack is secure, tell us its name so as we can audit it. Hiding behind anonymity so as only the open source projects take the bullet is not a proof of security.

By aguy · 13 minutes ago13 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

There is something fundamentally contradictory about your entire argument.

You claim that AI has become so powerful that it can uncover vulnerabilities experienced developers have overlooked for years. At the same time, you argue that these same AI tools are going to destroy software security because developers are incapable of using them properly.

You seem to have missed the most important part: AI does not exclusively benefit people looking for vulnerabilities. It also benefits the people identifying, understanding, preventing, and fixing them.

Modern AI systems can analyze large codebases, trace execution paths across multiple classes, identify missing validation, examine trust boundaries, suggest architectural improvements, generate regression tests, and assist with reviewing complex changes. These capabilities are available to defenders just as they are to attackers.

And unlike the picture you are trying to paint, experienced developers do not suddenly become irrelevant because someone with an AI subscription can ask questions about source code. Quite the opposite. Developers who understand their systems can use these tools with significantly more context, evaluate their conclusions, recognize false positives, and implement changes without introducing regressions elsewhere.

AI is a force multiplier, not a replacement for engineering judgment.

You also appear to misunderstand what constitutes a verified security vulnerability.

An AI identifying a suspicious method is not proof of an exploit. A plausible attack scenario is not proof that the attack succeeds. Even a proposed patch is not necessarily proof that the original code was vulnerable.

A proper security finding requires an identifiable failure, a reproducible scenario, an understanding of its actual impact, and verification that the proposed correction addresses the underlying problem.

None of that becomes optional simply because an AI generated the analysis.

You have repeatedly claimed to have discovered an extraordinary number of vulnerabilities affecting virtually every available project. You have also accused developers of incompetence, questioned their priorities, and suggested that they charge people for security improvements that supposedly do not exist.

These are substantial accusations, yet you expect them to be accepted without independently verifiable evidence.

You are free to withhold exploit details. Nobody is asking you to publish instructions that could harm running servers. But withholding evidence also means accepting that others cannot independently validate your conclusions.

What is particularly interesting is your assumption that developers working on gameplay accuracy must therefore be neglecting security.

Software development does not operate according to that false choice. Gameplay correctness, protocol validation, stability, performance, architecture, and security can all be addressed as part of ongoing maintenance. A commit correcting a skill formula tells you absolutely nothing, by itself, about the security knowledge or priorities of its author.

There is another point worth considering.

If AI has enabled you to discover problems that you could not previously identify, that demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted development. It does not establish that the developers maintaining these projects lack competence.

In fact, your own experience supports the opposite conclusion from the one you are promoting: AI is making sophisticated code analysis more accessible. The same technology can help developers discover weaknesses earlier, investigate them faster, and systematically improve code quality.

Naturally, AI-generated code requires review and testing. So does human-written code. Neither has a monopoly on mistakes, and neither deserves blind trust.

The meaningful distinction is between disciplined engineering and careless engineering, not between human development and AI-assisted development.

Finally, repeatedly announcing that the entire community is heading toward catastrophe contributes nothing measurable to its security.

If you possess verified findings, those findings have technical value. If you choose not to disclose them, that is your decision. But the absence of disclosed evidence cannot be turned into evidence that everyone else is incompetent.

AI has changed what individuals can accomplish in software engineering. It has not changed the burden of proof.

And perhaps the greatest irony here is that the technology you credit with making you capable of discovering vulnerabilities is the very same technology you underestimate when it is placed in the hands of developers who understand the systems they maintain.

The future of software security will not be determined by who can generate the most alarming forum post.

It will be determined by who can turn increasingly powerful tools into verified, reliable, and maintainable software improvements.

By Atumenos · 28 minutes ago28 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

The issue is more complex than you make it appear.

If me, a bus driver turned AI coder, can identify various exploits using AI for six months now (it started in April for me), it's only logical to assume that seasoned senior engineers can do much better. The problem is I don't see the fixes. I have access to the three flagship open source packs (L2JServer, L2JMobius, aCis) that have recently released newer versions. None of them have any of the fixes, but has tons of unecessary tweaks on skill formulas, geodata and such. This looks like the developer teams don't know what priorities are or that they have no sense on the reality of the emulation / server world. They treat the projects as toys.

And that would be fine, except they are charging people money for private versions supposedly having earlier fixes, which they don't have !. Which is why, answering to the 2nd quesiton, I am not sharing a list of exploits, nor am I contributing any fixes. I have no obligation to the developers of these semi-public packs. And besides, this forum here is called maxcheaters, not maxcoders, not maxcvedatabase. There's a section about sharing exploits, we are the bad guys here.

Also do not assume that I have not approached people discretelly in the past to explain to them where their packs need attention. In the best cases, they didn't even understand why their packs are vulnerable, and dismissed fixes they later applied silently. At worst cases they became very rude about it confusing a discrete privatelly disclosed issue to them personally, is an attempt to insult them.

Also I'm not irresponsiblity spreading exploits. I've only posted one adena dupe and gave an explanation to a leaked one that the project owner didn't patch for long and people found out. That doesn't mean I have any responsiblity to explain to everyone how to use every exploit. If you look carefully at conversations, you will notice that certain high profile open source developers, have difficulty grasping how an exploit works when you give them the fix / patch. That show's that they are probably not good enough, or experienced enough in that matter.

Do you wanna tell us what pack you are using / developing so as we can check how valid my claims are ? Maybe I'm wrong and your specific pack which I don't know, is not vulnerable. That would be good to know there's at least a pack that's secure enough for us to use. I'd be glad to spend some tokens on it to do an audit.

By aguy · 40 minutes ago40 min

[L2OFF] L2Giants

Featured Replies

Create an account or sign in to comment

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posts

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Topics

[L2OFF] CLExt Gracia Final P110 — Alpha/Beta

L2 TORCH X15 H5 SUB ACU BASE +3

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

[Share]korean protocol 606 new lobby collection

Looking for a Serious Lineage II Project Partner / Co-Owner

Group Legend

Who Was Online

Important Information

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)

Chrome (Desktop)

Safari (iOS 16.4+)

Safari (macOS)

Edge (Android)

Edge (Desktop)

Firefox (Android)

Firefox (Desktop)