MaxCheaters Official Group on Discord

Top.MaxCheaters.com is now OPEN – Lineage 2 Top Listing

Your announcement here - click to advertise

Skills Enchant.

Followers

Zian

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
101 posts
0 Badges
60,673 Member No
11/10/2009 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 88.11%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 5,560 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #2,558

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Chania-Greece

November 10, 200916 yr

Zito Signomi an yparxei to Topic :-[ gt den kserw kala to MaxCheaters Forum :P

pws mporw na kanw se normal char Skills Enchanet ??? Yparxei kapoio Command???

thankss :D

paylis92

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
123 posts
6 Badges
38,107 Member No
03/01/2009 Joined

Lv. 14 Novice

EXP 9.23%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 5,780 / 6,783
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #2,303

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Country:

November 10, 200916 yr

den se katalavenw ti akrivos 8eleis na kaneis aderfe !! allios 8a se voi8ousa :) :P !

ExTrEmEDwarf

Legendary Member

Offline Status
Legendary Member Group
8.2k posts
8 Badges
26,914 Member No
14/08/2008 Joined

Lv. 44 2nd Class Expert

EXP 24.07%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: C-Grade
EXP: 101,605 / 105,922
Next grade: Lv. 52
Quests: 8 / 13
Rank: #5

Awards3

Veteran
Scribe
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Current Mood:
Gender: Male
Country:

November 10, 200916 yr

ama anoixeis to skillname-e apo to system folder tha evlepes ola ta skill lvl kai enchants.

gia paradigma ama thes ena +30 skill kaneis //add_skill ToSkillId 130

Zian

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
101 posts
0 Badges
60,673 Member No
11/10/2009 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 88.11%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 5,560 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #2,558

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: Chania-Greece

November 10, 200916 yr

Author

<3 thanks ExTrEmEDwarf Rulez :D

Edit: Sry kai an thelw na to kanw +20 leme paei sta 100Lvl dld, anti gia 130?

The-LeGenD

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
99 posts
0 Badges
59,476 Member No
18/09/2009 Joined

Lv. 13 Novice

EXP 13.09%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 4,815 / 5,678
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #3,102

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

November 11, 200916 yr

File Mou Zian Opws sou eipe k o ExTreMeDwarf Anoigeis to admin panel.. patas Game List (briskeis to name tou char pou theleis) Patas Ena Click panw tou meta tha s anoiksei to panel tou Char Ekei tha deis Mia kartela pou leei Skills Patas Kai Meta Add Skills (exeis brei omws Me Alt+G to Id Tou Skill pou theleis) Opote Afou Exeis Patisei Add Skill Sou Grafei Kapou Sto Kentro ID Kai LvL Opote Bazeis To Id tou Skill pou Theleis Kai Meta An (101= +1 102=+2 Ktlp...) Elpizw Katalabes... Kai Gia to Skill Sou Pou Theleis Na to Kaneis +20 Px: Id: 101 Level 130 [stunning shot Id: 101 Level: 130 opote exeis twra ston char p exeis epileksei to Stunning Shot +30 Chance) An Eisai Se Gracia Final Kai theleis na to alakseis apo Chance Se Magic Defence gia paradeigma perneis kt book pou legonte Giant Book- Oblivion Kai etsi to alazeis se oti thes.. apla xaneis -1~3 Enchant's! Elpizw Na Se Boithisa...

EDIT: Enas Mod An Einai Na Kanei Lock! Na min dimiourgithei spam...elpizw twra katalabe o Owner Tou Topic Pws to kanei kai lithike to problem tou... :)

symeon24

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
287 posts
0 Badges
56,348 Member No
24/07/2009 Joined

Lv. 16 Novice

EXP 29.15%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 8,395 / 9,345
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 4 / 13
Rank: #928

Awards2

Veteran
Hunter

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male
Location: 34100

November 11, 200916 yr

file kane akribos afto target to name p 8elis meta //add_skill (to id t skil s lew egw 1 id 111) 130 einai +30 an 8es +20 120 kai pai legontas apo mprosta bazis to 1kai poso 8es na pai...

2 weeks later...

DaяkBull™

Members

Offline Status
Members Group
65 posts
0 Badges
62,779 Member No
18/11/2009 Joined

Lv. 12 Novice

EXP 25.25%

Race: Adventurer
Grade: No-Grade
EXP: 4,025 / 4,685
Next grade: Lv. 20
Quests: 3 / 13
Rank: #4,955

Awards1

Veteran

N/A 0 0 0

Gender: Male

November 19, 200916 yr

File M..Pata //add_skill px 5642 130 Kai Eisai Ok..

Create an account or sign in to comment

Followers

Go to topic listing

Survivors of Lineage (A Vampire Survivors-style game on L2)

Finally, someone putting AI to good use!

This is exactly what I like to see. Someone taking an idea, using the tools available to bring it to life, and actually delivering a playable game instead of endlessly talking about what AI can or cannot do.

26 heroes, 42 weapons, 8 maps, character progression, leaderboards, and even daily challenges. That's quite a lot of work for a side project.

More importantly, you've taken the Lineage 2 universe and done something different with it, rather than creating yet another private server.

AI doesn't magically make a good game. You still need ideas, direction, creativity, and the ability to put everything together into something enjoyable.

Great work, Elfo! Keep developing it. It's refreshing to see something original coming out of this community for a change.

By Atumenos · 24 minutes ago24 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Again: Tell me the name of your pack and let's see how secure it is. It's unfair that public packs get all the blame since they are in the forefront of exposure. Name of the pack, source or jar location and I'm happy to waste my tokens on yours to help the community with fixes. After all I dont need them anywhere else, I'm a bus driver.

It's funny how when you run out of arguments, you start with the insults on my occupation.

If your pack is SO secure, you have nothing to afraid from a bus driver with a Claude Max subscription. Name the pack, I'm waiting.

By aguy · 33 minutes ago33 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Six months of asking Claude questions doesn't make you a security expert. You're confusing AI-generated findings with actual engineering knowledge.

Experienced developers build, maintain, and fix entire projects. You make accusations without providing verifiable evidence.

Enough attention-seeking. Go back to driving and leave software development to people who actually understand it.

By Atumenos · 35 minutes ago35 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

It's correct that at the right hands these tools can augment visibility and tracing of issues. But only if your priority is to look for these issues. The problem is that nobody seems to be looking. AI won't magically tell you once you open a random context, hey you have race condition there, an invalid state there, a threadlock there. It needs investigation.

So far the evidence we have from the open source packs is that their developers are not activelly looking. Check my other thread about how to dupe adena in L2JMobius. Confirmed exploit ingame, 2 lines patch, he didn't even bother to fix it. Previous exploit about adena dupe in his pack, same thing, reported exploit, reproduced, patch shared, only applied it after enough pressure and countless of arguments with his team so as they finally get to understand how it works.

Now regarding patching and contributing. The nature of patching and contributing has changed. It's more valuable to investigate, prompt the right questions and instructions, find and validate an issue, than sharing the patch. The patch is easy to generate once the exploit is shared. Some people operate under the assumption that we will hand-feed them PR requests for issues they have caused themselves.

You are wrong to believe that AI tools will make the code more secure. Here's where we disagree. The tools are only good for what you use them for. Most people use them to prototype things, get them to "just work". There's tons of new code created this way every day, that simply there's not enough manpower to use the AI tools to do security analysis.

To put it simpler:

If 10 people use AI to make features and only 2 look for security in them, the 2 will get simply overwhelmed. It's only nature. Thats the reason we are entering a bad phase for security, it's not the quality of the AI tools, but hte priorities people seem to have with them.

AGAIN: if you are so sure that your pack is secure, tell us its name so as we can audit it. Hiding behind anonymity so as only the open source projects take the bullet is not a proof of security.

By aguy · 39 minutes ago39 min
Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

There is something fundamentally contradictory about your entire argument.

You claim that AI has become so powerful that it can uncover vulnerabilities experienced developers have overlooked for years. At the same time, you argue that these same AI tools are going to destroy software security because developers are incapable of using them properly.

You seem to have missed the most important part: AI does not exclusively benefit people looking for vulnerabilities. It also benefits the people identifying, understanding, preventing, and fixing them.

Modern AI systems can analyze large codebases, trace execution paths across multiple classes, identify missing validation, examine trust boundaries, suggest architectural improvements, generate regression tests, and assist with reviewing complex changes. These capabilities are available to defenders just as they are to attackers.

And unlike the picture you are trying to paint, experienced developers do not suddenly become irrelevant because someone with an AI subscription can ask questions about source code. Quite the opposite. Developers who understand their systems can use these tools with significantly more context, evaluate their conclusions, recognize false positives, and implement changes without introducing regressions elsewhere.

AI is a force multiplier, not a replacement for engineering judgment.

You also appear to misunderstand what constitutes a verified security vulnerability.

An AI identifying a suspicious method is not proof of an exploit. A plausible attack scenario is not proof that the attack succeeds. Even a proposed patch is not necessarily proof that the original code was vulnerable.

A proper security finding requires an identifiable failure, a reproducible scenario, an understanding of its actual impact, and verification that the proposed correction addresses the underlying problem.

None of that becomes optional simply because an AI generated the analysis.

You have repeatedly claimed to have discovered an extraordinary number of vulnerabilities affecting virtually every available project. You have also accused developers of incompetence, questioned their priorities, and suggested that they charge people for security improvements that supposedly do not exist.

These are substantial accusations, yet you expect them to be accepted without independently verifiable evidence.

You are free to withhold exploit details. Nobody is asking you to publish instructions that could harm running servers. But withholding evidence also means accepting that others cannot independently validate your conclusions.

What is particularly interesting is your assumption that developers working on gameplay accuracy must therefore be neglecting security.

Software development does not operate according to that false choice. Gameplay correctness, protocol validation, stability, performance, architecture, and security can all be addressed as part of ongoing maintenance. A commit correcting a skill formula tells you absolutely nothing, by itself, about the security knowledge or priorities of its author.

There is another point worth considering.

If AI has enabled you to discover problems that you could not previously identify, that demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted development. It does not establish that the developers maintaining these projects lack competence.

In fact, your own experience supports the opposite conclusion from the one you are promoting: AI is making sophisticated code analysis more accessible. The same technology can help developers discover weaknesses earlier, investigate them faster, and systematically improve code quality.

Naturally, AI-generated code requires review and testing. So does human-written code. Neither has a monopoly on mistakes, and neither deserves blind trust.

The meaningful distinction is between disciplined engineering and careless engineering, not between human development and AI-assisted development.

Finally, repeatedly announcing that the entire community is heading toward catastrophe contributes nothing measurable to its security.

If you possess verified findings, those findings have technical value. If you choose not to disclose them, that is your decision. But the absence of disclosed evidence cannot be turned into evidence that everyone else is incompetent.

AI has changed what individuals can accomplish in software engineering. It has not changed the burden of proof.

And perhaps the greatest irony here is that the technology you credit with making you capable of discovering vulnerabilities is the very same technology you underestimate when it is placed in the hands of developers who understand the systems they maintain.

The future of software security will not be determined by who can generate the most alarming forum post.

It will be determined by who can turn increasingly powerful tools into verified, reliable, and maintainable software improvements.

By Atumenos · 53 minutes ago53 min

Skills Enchant.

Featured Replies

Create an account or sign in to comment

Posts

Survivors of Lineage (A Vampire Survivors-style game on L2)

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

Topics

[L2OFF] CLExt Gracia Final P110 — Alpha/Beta

L2 TORCH X15 H5 SUB ACU BASE +3

Is L2J's gameserver security indefinitelly compromised ?

[Share]korean protocol 606 new lobby collection

Looking for a Serious Lineage II Project Partner / Co-Owner

Group Legend

Who Was Online

Important Information

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)

Chrome (Desktop)

Safari (iOS 16.4+)

Safari (macOS)

Edge (Android)

Edge (Desktop)

Firefox (Android)

Firefox (Desktop)