Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Kara` said:

@Celestine if i tell 5 clients of mine right now to download Rizel's phoenix engine and compare to my engine and say its completely different engine will he get punish for false information on my topic? Give me the -ok and i'll pm 5 clients right now. This kid claim that because the other engine is using a switch cases core for runnin the event case this is HIS OWN JAVA CODE and nobody else can use the same method.

 

I wait for the ok if he is about to get punish ill tell them to write here.

Since you don't own the entire copyright for the derivative work, you must still ask for permission before making copies of it. Because of this, taking someone else's work and changing some of the words only creates a derivative work and does not give you full ownership of the copyright.

Edited by BruT
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, BruT said:

Since you don't own the entire copyright for the derivative work, you must still ask for permission before making copies of it. Because of this, taking someone else's work and changing some of the words only creates a derivative work and does not give you full ownership of the copyright.

 

XD is this guy trolling or what? Someone please inform me i'm lost.

The engine belong to me completely. Each line. Stop wasting your time and do what you do with your brand new account.

Edited by Kara`
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Kara` said:

 

XD is this guy trolling or what? Someone please inform me i'm lost.

all those events are taken from rizen's phoenix engine without his permission for resell and every dev can confirm that, NOT client since they dont know anything related to java

Edited by BruT
Posted
Just now, BruT said:

all those events are taken from rizen's phoenix engine and every dev can confirm that NOT client since they dont know java

Ok I'm pm a GMOD to compare my sources with rizel's. But ill request you ban for false info in public. 

Stop the spam now HF

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Kara` said:

Ok I'm pm a GMOD to compare my sources with rizel's. But ill request you ban for false info in public. 

Stop the spam now HF

proof, we dont care about the source

https://ibb.co/kHkDDkR

 

 

Edited by BruT
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, BruT said:

hahahahahahaha funny guy. Because i used switch to handle the core of each event is copy ? Hahahahaahhahahahahahaha i laugh so hard entertain me more

 

PS. I'm done with you. You're a drug dealer nothing more. Aint respond to you again. Go try make me butthurt as much u can :) prove me right that i'm better person than you

Edited by Kara`
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Kara` said:

hahahahahahaha funny guy. Because i used switch to handle the core of each event is copy ? Hahahahaahhahahahahahaha i laugh so hard entertain me more

the entire Core class structure is taken from his engine, dont tell me that u wrote all this cuz its all identical, you just moded few lines the rest is 1:1 with his engine which makes him the owner of the code

 

https://ibb.co/T29cTnh

 

this code isnt taken from his source no? and thats just one event, i am sure they rest are the same, did you give him credits for that?

 

Edited by BruT
Posted

I just saw via teamviewer kara's code and i have some comments

a) The core is looking similar to rizels (we talk about 1 class here)

b) The xml also looks similar

c) The rest of the code is years ahead and not even close to rizels code and its more than 20 classes

 

 

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Nightw0lf said:

I just saw via teamviewer kara's code and i have some comments

a) The core is looking similar to rizels (we talk about 1 class here)

b) The xml also looks similar

c) The rest of the code is years ahead and not even close to rizels code and its more than 20 classes

 

i dont care about your opinion since you arent a dev, give rizen his credits cuz its copy of his work

Edited by BruT
Posted (edited)

Here's is DIMIS the guy who got scammed 200e saying that they huge effort in takin the money back via telephon and shit while brutus said he sended them back.

 

rRt6oFW.png

 

nzremeL.png

 

Translation:

ta peirame meso paypal -> We took em via paypal

monoi mas - > Alone

dn mas ta edine pisw -> He didn't give them back

kaname dispute se paypal me tilefwna klp -> We did dispute via phone in paypal e.t.c 

 

Conclusion? For those who buy stuff from Brutus consider he is

 

1. Liar

2. Stealing info from your computer (codes e.t.c)

3. Banned for scam in total 400e (REAL SCAM like take money and go away) - 2 times. 

 

HF now

Edited by Kara`
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Kara` said:

Here's is DIMIS the guy who got scammed 200e saying that they huge effort in takin the money back via telephon and shit while brutus said he sended them back.

 

nzremeL.png

 

Translation:

ta peirame meso paypal -> We took em via paypal

monoi mas - > Alone

dn mas ta edine pisw -> He didn't give them back

kaname dispute se paypal me tilefwna klp -> We did dispute via phone in paypal e.t.c 

this is an old case and there is nothing you can do about it, give rizen his credits copy-paster, and stop going off topic

Edited by BruT
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
Posted (edited)

PIQjDf.jpgaZ6Rp3.jpg6OArq5.jpgv90Khy.jpgbmtciE.jpgm38dnr.jpgHello, I buy some objects for l2warland from Nevertheless(in Skype Crank) he is scammed because I pay him with bitcoin and he is disappeared.

i show you all conversation with him and chat on skype.

Edited by Rise84

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..