Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

How did you came to the conclusion that tales lasts longer than 3 months? All I see in the top sites every month is a new tales, new era, new lionna and so on. 

Posted (edited)

 

:happyforever::happyforever:

aeqFr4s.png

  

12 hours ago, hmzzz said:

How did you came to the conclusion that tales lasts longer than 3 months? All I see in the top sites every month is a new tales, new era, new lionna and so on. 

28. feb started h5  (era/liona/destiny is different admin, mouse / sorin )

this video is from  7. may, still alive

 

Edited by AchYlek
Posted

L2Tales IL Features page, quests sections:

 

image.thumb.png.73c7929ab4bb488a73a428251e100185.png

 

RaidFight Features page, quests sections:
image.thumb.png.4fb63760ab58eaac3c6637a37b25d23b.png
 

 

On RF Dangerous Seduction is not capped and Hot Springs quests are from 68, not Lv 76 xD

 

They didn't even change the page.

 

 

The same on RB respawn times

 

  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Luigicol said:

L2Tales IL Features page, quests sections:

 

image.thumb.png.73c7929ab4bb488a73a428251e100185.png

 

RaidFight Features page, quests sections:
image.thumb.png.4fb63760ab58eaac3c6637a37b25d23b.png
 

 

On RF Dangerous Seduction is not capped and Hot Springs quests are from 68, not Lv 76 xD

 

They didn't even change the page.

 

 

The same on RB respawn times

 

i can say 2k20 servers copy / paste stalonka ideas / features, so this is not enough proff

 

they just change few things and its done

 

look l2tales https://l2tales.com/hf/features.php

 

https://l2e-global.gr/about/  same as interlude like u posted  

 

https://l2ramona.com/features-high-five.php

 

Edited by AchYlek
Posted
16 hours ago, AchYlek said:

i can say 2k20 servers copy / paste stalonka ideas / features, so this is not enough proff

 

they just change few things and its done

 

look l2tales https://l2tales.com/hf/features.php

 

https://l2e-global.gr/about/  same as interlude like u posted  

 

https://l2ramona.com/features-high-five.php

 

 

Wait, wait, you're not seriously suggesting that they aren't affiliated (tales, rightfight) after everything that's gone down in this topic, right? 

 

Their donation systems lead to the same PayPal account for crying out loud. There's nothing more to discuss here. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, mr zero said:

 

Wait, wait, you're not seriously suggesting that they aren't affiliated (tales, rightfight) after everything that's gone down in this topic, right? 

 

Their donation systems lead to the same PayPal account for crying out loud. There's nothing more to discuss here. 

actually i know all stalonka serbers, i was just saying about features, everyone copy it now 

Posted (edited)

Apologies then, I was under the impression that you were trying to point out that they aren't affiliated, when it's clear that they are. Yeah, features like quest rates and stuff tend to be copied or extremely similar between various projects. But that's not necessarily a bad thing (at least for players). I mean there are some things that just work. 

Edited by mr zero
Posted

reminder: OP claimed he has nothing to do with tales in his servers topic, now when hes getting fucked over, he decided to come here and cry. Truly pathetic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..