mcbigmac

You have no history - yet claim alot. You just joined and activate your donator membership. You reak of over promises and no factual basis - such as many have claimed over time. Based on history it's very rare someone can actually write custom code - and sometimes even script AI. You may not want to deceive - but help potential customers by showing\explaining what you've done. So the forum avoids more false and crap trades that seems to have influxed on l2off lately.

If there's enough interest - i might be interested in porting some antibot stuff to C4.

In all fairness - why would you not stop and use your brain for 1 minute? "I have the best h5 files!" - really? If you were buying a lamborghini - wouldn't you RESEARCH a bit about it? see how it looks? If someone offers you the best of the best for a FRACTION of what others are selling - it's probably a big fat lie. ...but he should be banned for a while or punished atleast.

NEWNAME db "OlympiadOpponent",0 ret QWORD 7024F3h ret2 QWORD 702581h ChangeNameProc1 proc lea [rsp+30h], NEWNAME jmp ret ChangeNameProc1 endp ChangeNameProc2 proc lea [rsp+30h], NEWNAME jmp ret2 ChangeNameProc2 endp Im outlaw da supah coder. Figure out the rest yourself since ur skilled.

Sameway you hook anything - by code. Research the offset(s) in L2Server where it sends the specific packet - determine best way to hook it and change the argument variables with least ammount of code - and then program it.

....soo... post it. Or nothing will\can be done.

In L2server - you need to code\inject to change this on CSocket::Send - either directly where it sends or by a vtable hook globally. There is no configuration.

Do you really make that much by scamming people and deceiving them full of lies - that it's worth it to keep up the charade of your supposed knowledge? Why not learn? I don't get it unless it's somehow a magic goldmine. You said your super skilled - so analyze and get me the formula. Prove everyone wrong.

//GF FE7A=OlympiadUserInfoSpectator:h(subID)c(Side)d(ObjectID)s(Name)d(ClassID:Get.ClassID)d(CurrentHP)d(MaxHP)d(CurrentCP)d(MaxCP) FE7B=ExOlympiadSpelledInfo:h(subID)d(ObjectID)d(ListSize:Loop.01.0003)d(skillID)h(Data)d(Duration) //Interlude FE29=ExOlympiadUserInfo:h(subID)c(Side)d(charObjID)s(Name)d(ClassId)d(cur_HP)d(max_HP)d(cur_CP)d(max_CP) FE2A=ExOlympiadSpelledInfo:h(subID)d(charObjID)d(Count:for.0003)d(skillID)h(dat)d(duration) Intercept on send, stop them completely or replace name string with "Opponent 1" etc. Can imagine client might actually REQUIRE\WANT these packets - so probably best just to null information and replace name with something random PS Outlaw: Waiting for the formula for i_m_attack harvested from c4 l2server.exe. Really need your awesome expertise to get it!

During watching olympiad? Simplest route i see - is just nulling information in the specific packet. Think removing by clientside would be too much trouble - or just removing spectating as an option.

....you realize any java fork contains that?

....and where is this fabled huge ecommerce site that sells semi illegal emulators, and extended cracked work based on leaked illegal software? And delivers it to your door in physical media! I think you'll make alot of people happy by sharing it incl. me.

The child within me just died.

No one knows what your talking about - because it's the same thing. There are no source leaks - extenders are built on research and then programmed as dlls to hook into the applications. Period. If your looking for sources to extenders - that's another thing.

So you just flamed instead of answer all the points i made? You know what that looks like right - and how it looks for someone that claims to be a software engineer capable of writing extenders as childsplay right? Basically you replied to me like an arrogant kid - without answering any points except vaguely claiming you work for softlayer (AND - your the shit there as well) so you totally got a footprint or a few U's to yourself right? Seriously? And of course i'm not worth replying to - because you just proved you can't actually debate or disprove my points. Nothing answers the point - if you had zero to hide you'd open up and show everyone the real deal. Show me how you dealt with the dupes in GF, the resurrection issue, the olympiad points etc. Just show some code or explain a few things. It's childsplay right? Why will any of you players join this? It doesn't make any logical sense to support Admins undercover like this. PS: Looking forward to seeing your NO DONATION SERVER - since your not doing it for the money.

I might be judging too quick here - but let me point out where i believe you've made flaws in your little marketing plan and why your fake. - You claim your from l2x - and of course your one of the elusive female staffers yet provide no proof of said stuff or a logical reason why social-based GM (Anne was not a hardcore gamer) would suddenly return after all these years to do this. Id imagine she'd be off living her life and hopefully being happy at it. - You claim your the developer and you've developed your "extender" - if you are the person you claim you are the chances of that happening are: USA switching from a 2 party system to... discovering there's an entire parallel world full of talking animals in your closet. Neither would Anne suddenly learn intricate GM commands and post helpful comments in the help l2off section. - Softlayer doesn't currently and has never provided colocation of hardware (Atleast as i remember?) - ergo "own hardware" is utter horsecock and further indication something is...not up to code along with the proxy crap - most likely. While not necessarily an indicator - your weird English "grammatics" and certain "typo's" don't seem even close to how Anne from l2x used to be. I'd wager you probably dropped the whole name taking thing directly - because that's been tried alot lately with catastrophic results (And with the l2x name too!). But this isn't what puzzles me - i seriously doubt all the effort into creating this fake brand around a former "great" server\person can be profitable ( Since there's lots of talk of balance - then complete unbalance by farming. Along with zero mentions of donation possibilities which must be "aplenty" - since having none whatsoever is a feature for most). It irks me that if all that effort would go into just making a decent setup - you'd probably succeed more. Go figure. It's becoming so damn easy to spot untruths in "l2off marketing" - if not direct lies.

Very clearly you didn't truncate\clear your DB correctly before creating the first char on the server - and\or imported\created data in subtables macros\user_sociality etc. It's clearly a DB issue - so don't waste time on it and just clean up when creating new worlds.

Stop using c1. It's horribly coded and half of those errors are indirect errors of other issues most likely caused by bad script + dll fixing combinations. No one really knew how stuff worked back then, they just made direct assumptions on every hook. Youd need to spend time researching c1 binary to figure out more and view the current dlls you use.

I respect people that want to learn - i don't respect people that want a solution served for them. And i definately do not respect if people don't react to information given them to when asking for help. Your also a fantastic instigator of things not your business as you say - might wanna think about that before you poke your nose out. I suspect you are you are of the latter type as well - since you did not sit down and try either you expected a idiotproof step-by-step solution. I've seen how many of you over the many years... lost count. Prove me wrong - i'd like to be.

Here's the flow: Asked Question > Got Answer > Did not understand answer -> Ignored answer -> Asked the question again directly. Is that a normal person's logic? Really? No... "Hey dude i don't get X could you elaborate?". Because your unsure and unable to think logicly - i'm the bad guy? MMkay.

Idiot passive aggressive newbieness that cannot read. 1. He's got a target issue in data (no effect) 2. He's forgot skillgrp\client (no animation) First solution presented over 24 hours ago, you and the below average intelligence group don't notice or don't read. Ability to comprehend and react to given critical information, zero.

Then show your skill and AI data. Your incredibly backwards and neanderthalic when you don't share what you've done. I already posted the solution - but apparently your so daft (yes stupid or\and unable to specify your problem) that you don't notice. I don't know what's sadder.

...... I give up.

1. So your solution to increase speed is to create an ENTIRELY new skill that has the p_speed effect - and THEN add said passive skill to a monster. ...despite the fact base speeds can be changed in every single NPCData line? Smurt. ground_high={130;0;0} ground_low={72;0;0} controls the walking \ "below water walking" speeds. Can't actually remember the 2nd \ 3rd params but since they're virtually always null i'd leave them at that and just change first param values there. Or if you must know test\research yourself. 2. target_type = self affect_scope = party Can't have an npc cast a skill on a different target - where skill is predefined to work on the caster ONLY. Your textbook 101 buffer AI issues. 3. In order to give a monster a skill it depends on wether it's a passive boost - or a skill that needs to be cast in certain conditions. The entire AI.obj is structured with AI code that controls the behaviour of all monsters, including but not limited to when they cast skills. Params like "PhysicalSpecial_a" point to a skill_pch id via @name that is set to be cast during certain conditions. If you want to add a entirely new condition where a Monster should cast a skill... write your own AI. There's a big chance however that one of the AI classes for monsters have pre-written AI to match your need to make it cast skills. Some cast 1 buff, others cast 2 - some cast 3 offensive\attack skills and others only Debuffs on players. You'll have to check and see if you can find a pre-written matching Type.

Why do all just give up and not check the basics? Ask in HTMLs is wrong compared to AI - change either and it'll work.