Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Stepping foot on foreign territory to attack or 'liberate' is unacceptable whatever the reasons might be. Specially in a democratic country where people choose who rules them.

 

I used to agree with Putin on everything, but now I just want him dead because he started a war. War cannot be justified, don't try to throw the ball on NATO, NATO did not send troops to Ukraine or Russia. If you start a war, it's your fault, end of story.

 

NATO leaders, specially the US ones are terrible and need to be changed/reformed immediately because they do not act upon the wellbeing of their people, they're after power and money. But there are other ways to deal with them rather than kill innocent civilians. Putin needs to burn in hell for that.

Posted

Not like americans milked everything. they all knew this war will happen they even created bases on Ukraine i dont understand why people hate russians it's not people fault but goverments Those leaders been leading for ages everything in wrong way everything is to be expected. today you live tommorow you dont hate their leaders but not the people. theirself people have nothing to do with this. also stop watching american crap BBC news this propaganda is shit everyone saying what ever he likes download telegram join some trustful groups and enjoy.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, An4rchy said:

Stepping foot on foreign territory to attack or 'liberate' is unacceptable whatever the reasons might be. Specially in a democratic country where people choose who rules them.

 

I used to agree with Putin on everything, but now I just want him dead because he started a war. War cannot be justified, don't try to throw the ball on NATO, NATO did not send troops to Ukraine or Russia. If you start a war, it's your fault, end of story.

 

NATO leaders, specially the US ones are terrible and need to be changed/reformed immediately because they do not act upon the wellbeing of their people, they're after power and money. But there are other ways to deal with them rather than kill innocent civilians. Putin needs to burn in hell for that.

then why China blames NATO for this conflict? i checked tons of sources and i didnt find a single video where russians are killing civils on purpose, but i saw tons of terrible videos with ukrainian origins.

 

and please dont come to we with the words its fake or propaganda because its not

 

tell me why did USA invested more than 5bilion on Ukraine? are they brothers or what? why on a country which is on the doorstep of Russia, its a madness to threat a country with the power to destroy the entire planet.

Edited by BruT
Posted
52 minutes ago, Celestine said:

Not like americans milked everything. they all knew this war will happen they even created bases on Ukraine i dont understand why people hate russians it's not people fault but goverments Those leaders been leading for ages everything in wrong way everything is to be expected. today you live tommorow you dont hate their leaders but not the people. theirself people have nothing to do with this. also stop watching american crap BBC news this propaganda is shit everyone saying what ever he likes download telegram join some trustful groups and enjoy.

 

I totally agree, I do not blame or hate Russians in any way. I hate people that hate Russians because of the actions of few men.

 

Americans and other NATO leaders are just as bad (or worse) as Putin and his leaders. BBC and generally television news are full of crap and one-sided 99% of the time, there is no point to watch them.

 

8 minutes ago, BruT said:

then why China blames NATO for this conflict? i checked tons of sources and i didnt find a single video where russians are killing civils on purpose, but i saw tons of terrible videos with ukrainian origins.

 

and please dont come to we with the words its fake or propaganda because its not

 

Russian military is not killing civilians on purpose (at least that's what I believe), but when you are bombing the enemy's military there's going to be collateral damage which includes people. Ukrainian AZOV and other neo-nazi organizations commit far worse crimes, but the law enforcement is responsible to put them in order and not another country's military.

 

 

Long story short, I do not believe neither Putin nor NATO is right. Both are to blame and they've put Ukraine in the middle to take all the beating. If Putin didn't start the war, he would have been 100% on the right.

Posted
39 minutes ago, An4rchy said:

 

I totally agree, I do not blame or hate Russians in any way. I hate people that hate Russians because of the actions of few men.

 

Americans and other NATO leaders are just as bad (or worse) as Putin and his leaders. BBC and generally television news are full of crap and one-sided 99% of the time, there is no point to watch them.

 

 

Russian military is not killing civilians on purpose (at least that's what I believe), but when you are bombing the enemy's military there's going to be collateral damage which includes people. Ukrainian AZOV and other neo-nazi organizations commit far worse crimes, but the law enforcement is responsible to put them in order and not another country's military.

 

 

Long story short, I do not believe neither Putin nor NATO is right. Both are to blame and they've put Ukraine in the middle to take all the beating. If Putin didn't start the war, he would have been 100% on the right.

Totally not. Few days before Russians started the special operation, Zelensky said: we are going to create a nuclear weapon. Btw, have you seen a video with British Military Defense Minister? He said the Britain will support Ukraine in this question.

And after all of this, can you imagine situation, where this neo-nazi get a nuclear bomb? Let's think together - will they use it against Russians, whom they hate so much?

There wasn't any other way to solve this situation. Russians must reduce the dangerous near it's own borders.
This is not a war or attack. Russians defense their future as a country and as a nation.

Posted

I think you're affected by the news you hear all day, do you really think if a superpower like Russia didn't want its neighbor to have nuclear weapons they would have to invade them? I think not, there's countless other ways to avoid it. Killing innocent people should never be an option and the cause does not justify the means.

 

Also based on your words, Putin wants to stop Ukraine from developing nuclear weapons. So why would he declare Donbas and Luhansk as separate countries? Makes no sense, unless you're wrong.

Posted

Maybe you forgot about Caribbean crisis in 1962? When USA didn't allow USSR put nuclear weapon to Cuba? So why Russians should allow Ukraine? 
How do you connect Ukraine's nuclear weapon and Donbas? He accept this countrys as non-Ukraine coz nazi bomb them around 8 years. If somebody say - it's not, and Ukraine forces fight vs Russian forces on Donbas.. now we can see what is Russian forces in action.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, TommyVersace said:

Maybe you forgot about Caribbean crisis in 1962? When USA didn't allow USSR put nuclear weapon to Cuba? So why Russians should allow Ukraine? 
How do you connect Ukraine's nuclear weapon and Donbas? He accept this countrys as non-Ukraine coz nazi bomb them around 8 years. If somebody say - it's not, and Ukraine forces fight vs Russian forces on Donbas.. now we can see what is Russian forces in action.

 

I did not forget about 1962 at all, in fact if you check my previous replies I mention that Putin (and Russia) would be 100% on the right if they did not attack. They lost their arguments the moment they sent military in a foreign country.

 

How do I connect Donbas with the situation? If you check Putin's speeches, he does not mention he sent a military operation to stop the Ukrainians from developing nuclear weapons. He said he sent a military operation to liberate Donbas and Luhansk from far right-wing attackers against the Russian speaking people of these areas. So I didn't connect nothing, Putin did with his words. If he said he is sending in troops to stop the development of nuclear weapons the situation would be very different.

 

 

You possibly be defending an attacker against a democratic country in 2022 unless you're brainwashed to believe what they tell you.

Edited by An4rchy
Posted
1 minute ago, An4rchy said:

 

I did not forget about 1962 at all, in fact if you check my previous replies I mention that Putin (and Russia) would be 100% on the right if they did not attack. They lost their arguments the moment they sent military in a foreign country.

 

How do I connect Donbas with the situation? If you check Putin's speeches, he does not mention he sent a military operation to stop the Ukrainians from developing nuclear weapons. He said he sent a military operation to liberate Donbas and Luhansk from far right-wing attackers against the Russian speaking people of these areas. So I didn't connect nothing, Putin did with his words. If he said he is sending in troops to stop the development of nuclear weapons the situation would be very different.

[GREEN] When NATO make military actions all over the word - nobody cares. When Russians - it's shocking. Double standards.

[RED] Actually he did. I guess you havent's seen this video.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, TommyVersace said:

[GREEN] When NATO make military actions all over the word - nobody cares. When Russians - it's shocking. Double standards.

[RED] Actually he did. I guess you havent's seen this video.

 

 

Perhaps I missed the video, my bad on that part.

 

I care when NATO is bombing innocent people and I hate that it's been going on for many years. It's shocking for any nation to attack another nation in the 21st fcking century. Idk why you assume I don't care, the people who don't are dumb fcks that just repeat what they hear on tv. Some of these people don't even know where Syria or Ukraine is on the map.

Posted

Maybe we misunderstood each other because this situation make some ppl mad, somebody dont care and so on. 
My message is just not to judge somebody from only one point of view. I mean if something is happening, there is a reason for it. Mosty people doesn't care about the reasons why Russians started all of this. People see only the fact.
I'm trying to explain that's it's not only Russian fault, there are too many big leader's mistakes / plans

Posted
46 minutes ago, TommyVersace said:

Maybe we misunderstood each other because this situation make some ppl mad, somebody dont care and so on. 
My message is just not to judge somebody from only one point of view. I mean if something is happening, there is a reason for it. Mosty people doesn't care about the reasons why Russians started all of this. People see only the fact.
I'm trying to explain that's it's not only Russian fault, there are too many big leader's mistakes / plans

 

It's not Russia's fault the American leaders are pure evil and manipulative, but it's not up to Putin (who is no better than them) to decide the fate of innocent civilians. That's my point of view.

 

There is no reason for Russian people and Ukrainian people to suffer for some power/money games of a few individuals. Under correct leadership, there wouldn't even be a need for nuclear weapons in the first place.

Posted
On 4/13/2022 at 12:30 AM, MrTitanas said:

Omg another zombie 

 

Are you like an idiot? I have been living in Ukraine for 31 years. And probably better than you know what's going on here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • Luniage - a custom Interlude client on Unity, with its own server Hi everyone. I've been quietly working on this for a long time and I think it's finally at the point where it's worth showing. Short version: it's Interlude, but the client and the server are both mine. The client is a custom one, built in Unity — not a patched or reskinned original. The server is written from scratch in C#. The only thing that comes from the old game is the content: the world, the models, the animations, the sounds, the icons, the interface art. The game looks and feels like the game you know. Everything underneath it is new. Why do this at all   Because the old client is a 2004 executable and anyone who has ever tried to add something to it knows exactly how that conversation ends. You can't add a window. You can't change how a skill looks. You can't fix a bug that's staring you in the face. Every server that wanted a feature of its own had to fake it through HTML dialogs and system messages, because the client simply won't bend. At some point it stops being worth fighting. I'd rather keep the game and rebuild everything around it. Where it is right now   You can sit down and play it. Not a tech demo, not a walk-around-and-look-at-the-trees build - an actual character. Most of the game is in: movement, combat, the skill system with its real formulas and timings, items and equipment, enchanting, shops and player trade, quests, parties, clans, and the whole interface that ties it together. Progression works from level 1 all the way through A grade - you can level, gear up, join a clan and run content today. What's missing isn't the foundation. It's the top end - and that's exactly where the work is pointed next.   Videos     What I'm working on now   Castle sieges and the Olympiad. The two biggest systems the game has, the ones that turn a working world into a server people actually stay on. And visual effects. They already run, but "runs" and "looks the way you remember it" are two very different things, and closing that gap turned out to be a much longer road than I expected. I'm going through them one by one. Does it run outside Windows   Yes. It's a Unity project, so Windows, Mac and Linux are just build targets. I actually develop on a Mac, which has kept the whole thing honest about staying portable. Will it work with my existing server   No, and it never will. The client talks to my server and nothing else - that's the trade I made, and it's the reason everything above is possible in the first place. If you're looking for a drop-in replacement client for a setup you already have, this isn't it. What's the goal   First and foremost, to launch my own project on it. That's what the client and the server are being built for, and that's what sets the priorities. Longer term, I'd like to open-source it. This community has spent twenty years working around a client nobody can touch, and I think the honest ending to this story is handing over something people can actually build on. I'm not putting a date on that - first it has to be good enough to be worth someone else's time. Can I try it   Not yet. When there's a build worth handing out, it gets posted here first. In the meantime I'll be posting progress regularly, and I read every reply. If you've run a server, built a client, or just spent a decade staring at this game and know exactly which detail everyone gets wrong — please say so. A good share of what's right in this project is right because somebody pointed at a screenshot and said "that's not how it looked." Thanks for reading.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..