Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, Designatix said:

First you even said that vote system was perfectly working before the hwid. Meaning his vote system is just fine.

The fact that your project is fcked up and the hwidh method is not implemented or not working properly is not Kara's problem it's yours. If you paid him for this work making the hwid working properly and he didn't make then yes you could say he did not complete the work but now you're wrong.

And the fact that he will give you money is even more wrong. You got what you paid, pay more for the hwid or simply find a solution on your own, it's not Kara's problem neither his vote system problem.

No i didnt say that because it never worked, it had bugs on every test i made on my server.

Kara knew my pack and he could refuse to code the vote but he didnt, he prefered to scam me with fake promises.

Hwid is working (with smartguard) which i have and he still couldnt do it.

Adding to that he said he could do it with 3 ways. smartguard + hwid + ip. All false.

If the pack is fcked just dont take the job and my money. I would be perfectly fine for that, i didnt pressure him at all (see the chat)

At the end of the day i payed for something i didnt receive. If you wanna blame smartguard go ahead. I just want the money i payed and didnt get what we agreed.

 

My last skype msg to you clearly said "30 euros" and your next msg says yo uwill refund on 3-4 days.

If you couldnt code it you should have not accepted my money.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, kavvadi said:

No i didnt say that because it never worked, it had bugs on every test i made on my server.

Kara knew my pack and he could refuse to code the vote but he didnt, he prefered to scam me with fake promises.

Hwid is working (with smartguard) which i have and he still couldnt do it.

Adding to that he said he could do it with 3 ways. smartguard + hwid + ip. All false.

If the pack is fcked just dont take the job and my money. I would be perfectly fine for that, i didnt pressure him at all (see the chat)

At the end of the day i payed for something i didnt receive. If you wanna blame smartguard go ahead. I just want the money i payed and didnt get what we agreed.

 

My last skype msg to you clearly said "30 euros" and your next msg says yo uwill refund on 3-4 days.

If you couldnt code it you should have not accepted my money.

 

Oh jesus. My vote engine is working perfectly sweets can confirm that cause he saw the code and other 3-4 that bough it. This restriction we added was custom and for some reason it return SMART-GUARD. also how u have smart-guard when u have shared pack? + i said 200 times ill refund u 20 euro no 30. 

And again kid, this is a scam section no delay section, the fact that we delay is not reason to post a scam topic. I got tired of you along with others 3 people who tell me to ignore you but i don't. U should report me if i said in skype no i wont help you bye or no respond.

Edited by Kara`
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Kara` said:

 

Oh jesus. My vote engine is working perfectly sweets can confirm that cause he saw the code and other 3-4 that bough it. This restriction we added was custom and for some reason it return SMART-GUARD. also how u have smart-guard when u have shared pack? + i said 200 times ill refund u 20 euro no 30. 

I only know it didnt work for me and i want the 30 euros back. It may worked for your other clients but thats none of my business.

If i have to upload proofs about my smartguard license i can do it, just ask for it.

 

ps. You keep referring to vote ONLY when there are more codes you didnt complete.

Edited by kavvadi
Posted
Just now, kavvadi said:

I only know it didnt work for me and i want the 30 euros back. It may worked for your other clients but thats none of my business.

If i have to upload proofs about my smartguard license i can do it, just ask for it.

Ok then why getHwid() prints SMART-GUARD?

Posted

How could he know if your hwid code works or not. So by default answer is yes I can. Things turn out sg is a crap with hard-coded stuff into jar and not providing methods for outside use.

Still not his fault. Plus, sg is connecting on startup, checking licence or whatsoever. So if you are their legit customer, talk to them to provide you hwid code or how to access it. If not, not rly Kara's fault. 

 

Check their forums, I saw ppl creating topics and asking for code. Mby you find it. Problem solved.

Posted
1 minute ago, SweeTs said:

How could he know if your hwid code works or not. So by default answer is yes I can. Things turn out sg is a crap with hard-coded stuff into jar and not providing methods for outside use.

Still not his fault. Plus, sg is connecting on startup, checking licence or whatsoever. So if you are their legit customer, talk to them to provide you hwid code or how to access it. If not, not rly Kara's fault. 

He could test the pack i told him i own (i told him where i got it from and it was free for test) so you are wrong. its totally his fault.I  didnt hide anything from hide. I got what i got promised from smartguard but i didnt get what i promised from kara. You can blame them as much as you want.

I didnt demand him to do thing he couldnt do but i want the money back fro mthe codes i didnt get.

Posted

What he can possibly test, get real. Shared pack has fully working smart guard? No as it don't have licence. So he could not test a thing.

 

Get hwid code from their forums, ask them how to access its stupid jar to retrieve hwid. Problem solved. 

Posted
Just now, SweeTs said:

What he can possibly test, get real. Shared pack has fully working smart guard? No as it don't have licence. So he could not test a thing.

 

Get hwid code from their forums, ask them how to access its stupid jar to retrieve hwid. Problem solved. 

He could test the Hwid method and the Ip method but he didnt.

Me contacted others to complete the code i payed to kara was never a part of the deal.

So i just want backthe money i payed and didnt receive working codes for.

Posted

So, if you will get your money back, fix the issue with smart guard. you have the fully working code for free . smart guy. Someone spent his hours for the thing you need, he must get paid. There was a problem with the smart guard? why the dev should care of it? open a ticket to them . Its like you open a case in l2jserver about the smartguard problem wtf? get real lol

Posted
3 minutes ago, kavvadi said:

He could test the Hwid method and the Ip method but he didnt

God.. It's like talking to the wall.

He could NOT test it, read with understanding.

 

Once again, you bought sg, they have hwid method, ask them for the method, how to retrieve it from their jar. Period.

 

@Kara` I wouldn't return anything. 

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, melron said:

So, if you will get your money back, fix the issue with smart guard. you have the fully working code for free . smart guy. Someone spent his hours for the thing you need, he must get paid. There was a problem with the smart guard? why the dev should care of it? open a ticket to them . Its like you open a case in l2jserver about the smartguard problem wtf? get real lol

No you are wrong. Smartguard has no problem and actually as it seems smartguard is the only hwid that works on the fandc-mythras-ava pack. I cant use the code because my project is "dead" and also it was part of the agreement that i will not resell it etc. Adding to that i offered him to take everything vote-code-related back. I DONT WANT IT.

If theres indeed a problem with smartguard he could tell me or contact them but he never did. He just took my money.

 

@SweeTs

No i will not ask others to help me on something i payed kara to do.

You do not seem to understand at all, he could test the ip / hwid method before he get my money and tell me it cant be done or whatever.

Edited by kavvadi
Posted
2 minutes ago, kavvadi said:

No you are wrong. Smartguard has no problem and actually as it seems smartguard is the only hwid that works on the fandc-mythras-ava pack. I cant use the code because my project is "dead" and also it was part of the agreement that i will not resell it etc. Adding to that i offered him to take everything vote-code-related back. I DONT WANT IT.

If theres indeed a problem with smartguard he could tell me or contact them but he never did. He just took my money.

thats his job lol. do you think by telling to someone do X,Y,Z things and then "you know something? i dont want them. remove them and give me back my money" . Really? what about his time? what about everything he did for you? 

 

You want him to contact with the smart guard for you? what? for what? its your responsibility if something is broken dude...

He got a request from you, he did that and get paid. now if your pack missing things or an extra thing is missing another thing its not his business. no he wont check everything else than his code debug because he made a deal for that and nothing else. if the price was increased for that purpose then yeah he could do that. 

Posted
Just now, melron said:

thats his job lol. do you think by telling to someone do X,Y,Z things and then "you know something? i dont want them. remove them and give me back my money" . Really? what about his time? what about everything he did for you? 

 

You want him to contact with the smart guard for you? what? for what? its your responsibility if something is broken dude...

He got a request from you, he did that and get paid. now if your pack missing things or an extra thing is missing another thing its not his business. no he wont check everything else than his code debug because he made a deal for that and nothing else. if the price was increased for that purpose then yeah he could do that. 

You are wrong in every sentence, let me explain you how.

He worked x hours and didnt deliver what he promised and thats 100% his problem. I was there all those hours + extra hours for testing on the server and I could ask money for those hours but im not doing that.

His job is to deliver a working code. Ididnt ask him to contact anyone.

He got a request from me, he got paid for me and then he didnt deliver. Thats the correct order and thats why im asking my 30 euros back. Keep in mind extra3+ codes missing.

If my pack is missing something just tell me and dont get my money.

He made a deal for a fully working vote system and it was a lie

 

Posted
1 minute ago, kavvadi said:

You are wrong in every sentence, let me explain you how.

He worked x hours and didnt deliver what he promised and thats 100% his problem. I was there all those hours + extra hours for testing on the server and I could ask money for those hours but im not doing that.

His job is to deliver a working code. Ididnt ask him to contact anyone.

He got a request from me, he got paid for me and then he didnt deliver. Thats the correct order and thats why im asking my 30 euros back. Keep in mind extra3+ codes missing.

If my pack is missing something just tell me and dont get my money.

He made a deal for a fully working vote system and it was a lie

 

look, i dont know if a code is missing or anything like that. im talking about the sg case.

 

He got a request from you to do something that contains the hwid from smart guard right?

He made the code that includes this thing. He finished , he got the money.

 

Its your responsibility to check your pack if everything is missing not his

 

Quote

His job is to deliver a working code. Ididnt ask him to contact anyone.

It is. smart guard metho is wrong and its 50% smart guard's problem and 50% yours. You could check that by your own

 

Quote

I was there all those hours + extra hours for testing on the server and I could ask money for those hours but im not doing that.

I wont even answer to that idiot quote

 

Quote

He worked x hours and didnt deliver what he promised and thats 100% his problem.

So if you request from me lets say an event with raid bosses, working on it for 2 days and after that me + you realize that your pack is missing the spawn manager is my fault?

Posted
1 minute ago, melron said:

look, i dont know if a code is missing or anything like that. im talking about the sg case.

 

He got a request from you to do something that contains the hwid from smart guard right?

He made the code that includes this thing. He finished , he got the money.

 

Its your responsibility to check your pack if everything is missing not his

 

It is. smart guard metho is wrong and its 50% smart guard's problem and 50% yours. You could check that by your own

 

I wont even answer to that idiot quote

 

So if you request from me lets say an event with raid bosses, working on it for 2 days and after that me + you realize that your pack is missing the spawn manager is my fault?

- No he got a request for a working vote system and he said there are 3 ways to do it, not only smartguard.

- He got the money first because he promised it would work for my server, then he did the coding which is not working corectly.

- My pack is not missing hwid system and no its not up to me to check. He saw it and he said it would be ok.

- I still dont think smartguard has a bug, it seems to work fine but he didnt make it. What he meant is that the pack doesnt have hwid system but instead it has hwid system only if u own smartguard which i do.

I hope i cleared the situation a bit.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • ## [1.5.5] - 2026-02-02   ### ✨ New Features - **Discord Login**: You can now sign in with your Discord account. Admins enable and configure Discord login in **cpadmin → Users** (Discord auth settings: Client ID, Client Secret, Redirect URI). If you already have an account with the same email (e.g. forum, Google, or legacy), signing in with Discord links to that account so you keep one profile. Discord login is available on Add Server, My Servers, Vote page, and Premium Ads booking. - **Setup Links**: In **cpadmin → Users**, both Google and Discord login settings now include direct links to their official developer portals (Google Cloud Console and Discord Developer Portal) for easier OAuth app setup.   ### 🔒 Security - **Email Required for Registration**: New user registration via OAuth (Forum, Google, Discord) now requires a valid email address. If the OAuth provider doesn't provide an email (e.g. unverified Discord email), registration is rejected with a clear message. This prevents anonymous accounts and ensures all users can receive important notifications.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **User Auth Badges**: In **cpadmin → Users**, the Registered Members table now shows auth method badges: **Forum**, **Google**, **Discord**, or **Legacy**. Users can have multiple badges if they've linked multiple login methods. - **Server Info Labels**: Translated server info labels (Owner Name, Language, Server Location) are now properly localized in all 5 languages (English, Spanish, Portuguese, Greek, Russian).   ---   ## [1.5.4] - 2026-02-01   ### ✨ New Features - **Google Login**: You can now sign in with your Google account. Admins enable and configure Google login in **cpadmin → Users** (Google auth settings: Client ID, Client Secret, Redirect URI). If you already have an account with the same email (e.g. forum or legacy), signing in with Google links to that account so you keep one profile. The login menu (navbar and login prompts) offers **Login with Forum Account**, **Login with Google** (when enabled), and **Create Forum Account**. Google login is available on Add Server, My Servers, Profile Settings, Vote page, and Premium Ads booking. - **Ban/Unban Members**: In **cpadmin → Users**, admins can ban or unban registered members. Banned users see a full-page message: "Sorry, you are banned from using this site." When a user is banned, all their servers are set to inactive. - **Moderator Activity Log**: **cpadmin → Moderators** now records when a moderator or admin enters the CPAdmin panel (e.g. "Moderator X entered CPAdmin panel at <time>") and when they change any cpadmin settings (only write actions are logged; read-only use is not). - **Clear Moderator Logs**: Admins can clear all moderator activity log entries via a **Clear logs** button with confirmation. Logs are shown at 100 per page with pagination. - **Filter by Moderator**: In the Moderator Activity Log, a **Filter by moderator** dropdown lets you view activity for a specific moderator or "All moderators." - **cpadmin → Users Tab**: New **Users** tab in the admin panel with Registered Members list (paginated), Google auth settings card, and per-user Ban/Unban and server links.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **cpadmin → Servers**: Each server name in the servers table is now clickable and opens that server’s info page. - **cpadmin → Users – Servers column**: The servers count/list is clickable and opens a small modal listing that user’s servers; each server name in the modal links to the server info page. - **cpadmin → Users – Search**: A search bar above the Registered Members table lets you search by **username**, **email**, or **server name**. Results are filtered on the server (paginated); clearing the search resets the list. - **Moderator Activity Log**: Pagination shows "Showing X–Y of Z" and "Page N of M" with Previous/Next when there are more than 100 entries. - **Login UI**: Login options (Forum, Google, Create account) are shown in a consistent dropdown and in modals (Add Server, My Servers, Vote, Premium Ads) for a clearer sign-in experience. - **Vote Page – Unauthenticated**: When you must log in to vote, the page now shows "Vote for [Server Name]" as the main heading and presents login options in a compact section.   ---   ## [1.5.3] - 2026-01-30   ### ✨ New Features - **File Logs in Admin Panel**: Admins can now view CodeIgniter PHP logs (api/writable/logs) directly in **cpadmin → Logs**. Select a date to view the log file, refresh to reload, or delete all log files to free up space.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Cache System**: Full cache audit and improvements — when you clear cache in cpadmin, both backend and frontend caches are cleared. Server listings, My Servers, pricing, ad config, and chronicles all refresh with fresh data. New paid servers now appear in listings and My Servers immediately. - **Admin Panel – Server Rates**: Server rates in the admin servers table now display in compact format (e.g. x10000 → x10k, x100000 → x100k, x1000000 → x1m) for easier scanning. Hover to see the full value.
    • WTB High Five source running on Salvation/Fafurion client
    • MoMoProxy has updated more static residential proxies for USA location, anyone interested in can view: https://momoproxy.com/static-residential-proxies
    • Hello, i am selling a project that was going to open but at the end i have not the time to do it Its a c4 server ( scripts) with all the c5 changes played from Interlude Client    the server is 1:1 copy of the legendary 2007 L2Revenge server with some bits like events and some more sync stuff There is a lot of retail fixes included  , extender is vanganth and has a lot of mods but mostly fixes on the retail stuff.   Test server is available through discord , i offer client/patch/server/sources The price is 300 Euro and for testing the server you have to pm me at discord banshee1019 , dont really wanna let anybody log because some people are "bad"   Once you buy you also have free support for 1 year , that doesnt mean i will code all your ideas but support you if something comes up , and guide you to do simple edits
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..