Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

this is all u do as far as i can see,

help or keep it for u, since ur not right.

 

actually i am right with it you just lack of knowledge to understand it so please dont be that ignorant or dont point your finger at me with "he flamed him he flamed him" cause thats not the case.

Posted

Intrepid didn't flame anyone, he just said his opinion. If you disagree, just tell him that in a better way(like i did).

Posted

actually i am right with it you just lack of knowledge to understand it so please dont be that ignorant or dont point your finger at me with "he flamed him he flamed him" cause thats not the case.

im just looking on ur current posts.

u just like to talk.

Posted

im just looking on ur current posts.

u just like to talk.

 

Like to talk?Okay than proove me wrong on anything regarding to l2j anything if you want open a topic somewhere and ask atleast we can leave the spam out of this topic...

Posted

Like to talk?Okay than proove me wrong on anything regarding to l2j anything if you want open a topic somewhere and ask atleast we can leave the spam out of this topic...

what l2j ? the one u fail :)) ?

Posted

as i said leave the spawm out of here and try to proove me wrong if you can :)

i dont want to prove u anything, since regarding to ur posts, u prove me a lot.

+ the chat i had with u on msn some time ago.

 

let this project finish his job, and dont talk about it when he is still in a egg.

and about spam, who's talking ? regarding to all ur posts that are the same. i dont know who spam moar.

Posted

trollty.jpg

 

Bha, IntrepidTroller :P.

 

If you read what I code, you will know I'm aware about Freya changes. "Know your enemy..." I didn't commit things like archer distance, static cooldowns, shield blocking magic (well it's what actually come in my mind). Or better say, I refactored as Freya is, but reverted to IL some parts of the code.

 

I don't need you agree with my project, you got an 'known problem' with IL and IL lovers (with people more simply), and as you seems to be back, I couldn't be "not" trolled about this personal choice.

 

Some choices have to be made, and I don't present the project to be retail-like, but the most "up-to-date" concerning features and methods. IL retail can't be reached, as L2Off IL isn't even retail-like. If L2J is 75% retail, L2Off is 95%. Still it's not retail. Retail can't be reached, but I can approach the 90% better than the original 75%, plus improving general code.

 

If I was copying skills from Freya, be aware I would have finished it since some weeks already... For you, "stupids demons of stupidity", I repeat once : I use IL as main build (values/effects/values effects), and refactor using Freya (isDebuff, saveVs, nextActionIsAttack,...). Some parts are even copied from Hellbound, as the ImmobileUntilAttacked effect (Meditation / ForceMeditation) which doesn't exist in Freya. Stop pointless offtopic then.

 

You try to fight with the wrong person talking with Sido, he's not aware about what I have changed, change and will change. Yourself, you do stupid (your favorite word fit well to you in this particular case) suppositions (like those ppl saying "aCis = fail" when they support a project using my own commits...) without even checking timeline.

 

I'm cold-minded and you make me more laugh than being upset.

 

Next time, do constructive posts. It doesn't have to be fully positive, nor positive. But avoids stupid attacks on non-existent problems. I know what I do, and if it's long, there is a reason. I verify what I commit using many websites, old answers from forums too.

 

-----

 

About next changes, to avoid to do a total offtopic (as Intrepid seems to like to bring chaos whenever he goes) :

 

PunishLevel (from Coyote share's idea), with a couple of adminhandlers refactors and shutdown refactor.

 

Yeah, from Freya. Admincommandhandlers will be disbalanced... MMOCore is disbalanced, friendinvite too... This is weird fork, really :(.

Posted

Bha, IntrepidTroller :P.

 

If you read what I code, you will know I'm aware about Freya changes. "Know your enemy..." I didn't commit things like archer distance, static cooldowns (well it's what actually come in my mind). Or better say, I refactored as Freya is, but reverted to IL some parts of the code.

 

I don't need you agree with my project, you got an 'known problem' with IL and IL lovers (with people more simply), and as you seems to be back, I couldn't be "not" trolled about this personal choice.

 

Some choices have to be made, and I don't present the project to be retail-like, but the most "up-to-date" concerning features and methods. IL retail can't be reached, as L2Off IL isn't even retail-like. If L2J is 75% retail, L2Off is 95%. Still it's not retail. Retail can't be reached, but I can approach the 90% better than the original 75%, plus improving general code.

 

If I was copying skills from Freya, be aware I would have finished it since some weeks already... For you, "stupids demons of stupidity", I repeat once : I use IL as main build (values/effects/values effects), and refactor using Freya (isDebuff, saveVs, nextActionIsAttack,...). Some parts are even copied from Hellbound, as the ImmobileUntilAttacked effect (Meditation / ForceMeditation) which doesn't exist in Freya. Stop pointless offtopic then.

 

You try to fight with the wrong person talking with Sido, he's not aware about what I have changed, change and will change. Yourself, you do stupid (your favorite word fit well to you in this particular case) suppositions (like those ppl saying "aCis = fail" when they support a project using my own commits...) without even checking timeline.

 

I'm cold-minded and you make me more laugh than being upset.

 

Next time, do constructive posts. It doesn't have to be fully positive, nor positive. But avoids stupid attacks on non-existent problems. I know what I do, and if it's long, there is a reason. I verify what I commit using many websites, old answers from forums too.

 

-----

 

About next changes, to avoid to do a total offtopic (as Intrepid seems to like to bring chaos whenever he goes) :

 

PunishLevel (from Coyote share's idea), with a couple of adminhandlers refactors and shutdown refactor.

 

Yeah, from Freya. Admincommandhandlers will be disbalanced... :(

 

hehe ofc i just mentioned that it can happen after some time i really dont mind what project whoever works on just mentioned a thing that can be happen :P

Posted

flame what?seriously i've seen the changes and its clear adaptation of things from freya to il...

 

hehe ofc i just mentioned that it can happen after some time i really dont mind what project whoever works on just mentioned a thing that can be happen Tongue

 

One word : You are exceptional :P. Ok it's 3, but still you worth it.

 

Back to topic plx :).

Posted

thanks for this nice share

this is not a share. it's a project (spamzor).

 

So after your next commit, you will refactor friendinvite or all of the commands? :)

Posted

See, it's those sorts of comments which are bad, or at least who show how bad are ppl :P.

 

Friends/blocklist are refactored since rev 46 (since 1 month ago). http://trac.assembla.com/acis_project/changeset/46

 

I will continue on skills, but begin admin commands aswell to split the boringness of skills XMLs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks
    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.
    • Your project doesn't compare to aCis; you have to be an idiot to use that. I know someone who bought the High Five "PREMIUM" version, which has the same bugs as the free version. If you want, I can share his latest premium version. Players are going through walls with their bad geoengine, falling under the Olympiad. If you want, I can record and prove what I'm saying. The aCis project is 50 steps ahead of yours and it's not even stable...
    • l2jteon, l2joneo l2jscoria etc etc. and from that we went to this 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock