Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This system already shared a long time ago for Rebellion forks and looks so ugly. No one from russian community didn't used this shit for live projects. Only for fun. And only you show it as own somehow achivement.

 

Take more time for following of trends in russian community and you will stop to create bicycle again.

 

No more comments.

Posted
2 hours ago, .Elfocrash said:

Also bots have automatic internal rebuffing and refueling of consumables (shots/arrows/bones) when they are about to run out.

Performance is solid.

 

 

 

this automation is on another level,if characters able to move at same time while hitting it gonna be close to a real mass pvp scenario

Posted

Implemented a small functionality that allows the admin to take control of a fake player.

For now it only supports movement but it is easy to add things like attack/skill casting.

 

 

Posted

Sell something like that,then people will give up totaly coz there is no hope for this videogame...

Well,at least there is the possibility of being a single player videogame.

 

Taking control over a bot ... interesting .

Posted
16 minutes ago, bravetobe said:

Sell something like that,then people will give up totaly coz there is no hope for this videogame...

Well,at least there is the possibility of being a single player videogame.

 

Taking control over a bot ... interesting .

What you guys don't get is that people are already using similar things like that. They are just poorly written, moronic and not sophisticated at all.

If you are to do it anyway then might as well do it right.

 

Also i still consider the possibility of releasing it for free. But this will depend on how much effort it will take to get it to a good place.

Posted
36 minutes ago, .Elfocrash said:

What you guys don't get is that people are already using similar things like that. They are just poorly written, moronic and not sophisticated at all.

If you are to do it anyway then might as well do it right.

 

Also i still consider the possibility of releasing it for free. But this will depend on how much effort it will take to get it to a good place.

U misunderstood my statement...

Yea obviously fake engines exist but providing something like this,it will make the things worse when it comes to gameplay.Well people might think that its fun to kill bots but personally i dont.

Thats the reason why i said that this engine will be a step closer to make l2 singleplayer videogame.

People can have their own opinion idk,but if we are supposed to play with 80< % bots,then whats the point...

Its just 1 more tool to keep the parasites alive.

Its nice experience to code something like this but the usage of it will be disgusting.

 

It would be fine for events with advanced AI mechanics party vs party /parties vs parties.Making something like this public will be nail into the coffin.. People aint stupid and it will make things worse.

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, .Elfocrash said:

What you guys don't get is that people are already using similar things like that. They are just poorly written, moronic and not sophisticated at all.

If you are to do it anyway then might as well do it right.

 

Also i still consider the possibility of releasing it for free. But this will depend on how much effort it will take to get it to a good place.

so players understand the fake and leave server imidietly.

thats actualy good and you will ruin it :)

5 minutes ago, bravetobe said:

U misunderstood my statement...

Yea obviously fake engines exist but providing something like this,it will make the things worse when it comes to gameplay.Well people might think that its fun to kill bots but personally i dont.

Thats the reason why i said that this engine will be a step closer to make l2 singleplayer videogame.

People can have their own opinion idk,but if we are supposed to play with 80< % bots,then whats the point...

Its just 1 more tool to keep the parasites alive.

Its nice experience to code something like this but the usage of it will be disgusting.

 

It would be fine for events with advanced AI mechanics party vs party /parties vs parties.Making something like this public will be nail into the coffin.. People aint stupid and it will make things worse.


it would be best for the event if 1 player enter the rest will be bots to party and etc (they fill the gap) but there is no actual event engine working to work on but good point there

 

PS the guys who will pay for this will have a server that will fail or already failed and 8/10 admin and have waste money on this remember that... the other 2 will play solo because you cant win players with players online and shit servers

Edited by Nightw0lf
Posted (edited)

The funny part here is that some people appear as the "Destroyers" of the game. "I'll share this engine and boom ! Lineage 2 community is dead."

Lineage 2 survived so many years though stupid admins, fail homemade servers and br/ru people who tend to photoshop fake nude models that keep their logo on a piece of paper just to attract more virgins. Guess what, your little code won't hurt it more.

 

So compare this to a conquest of the land. Your effort cost more than the benefits you get. You gonna waste your time while you could do something useful in your life, to try ruin a community that is already ruined. Worth it? And why? The majority of the target audience can figure out that this specific character is a bot and leave instantly. 

Edited by GamePsychology
Posted
38 minutes ago, GamePsychology said:

The funny part here is that some people appear as the "Destroyers" of the game. "I'll share this engine and boom ! Lineage 2 community is dead."

Lineage 2 survived so many years though stupid admins, fail homemade servers and br/ru people who tend to photoshop fake nude models that keep their logo on a piece of paper just to attract more virgins. Guess what, your little code won't hurt it more.

 

So compare this to a conquest of the land. Your effort cost more than the benefits you get. You gonna waste your time while you could do something useful in your life, to try ruin a community that is already ruined. Worth it? And why? The majority of the target audience can figure out that this specific character is a bot and leave instantly. 

Neither i have the intention that this will kill any game nor i think that this a bad think. On a personal level i like seeing populated servers rather than non populated server. I wouldn't recommend to someone to use this as in a ratio of 200/200 real/fake bur a 200/50 ratio.

 

Trust me all of you have been playing in high profile servers with bots and you don't even know it.

Posted (edited)

Also an extra update.

 

Implemented a auto scaling system where AI tasks are being spawned based on how many fake players are currently live (in the video the players per task value is 10).

This allows admins to configure how much stress they will put on a single task. Currently each task will iterate over all the players responsive for it and trigger the thingAndAct() method for them. The rest is up to the FakePlayerAI to decide.

 

Also started building a little bit of a dashboard to allow easy control of the bots.

 

 

Edited by .Elfocrash
Posted (edited)

Sweets also deleted my stress testing post. Anyways the bottom line is, don’t spawn a shit ton of bots that are attacking because you will have some performance issues. Bots will less functionality should be fine though.

 

there are ways to address them but it is not s priority for now

 

Edited by .Elfocrash

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • Hi, I'm selling Interface sources. I was working with one of bigger Essence projects (for ±1 year) delivering them Interface source KR. Per this period gathered knowledge about UE, UE Scripting, saw a lot of tools and their progression. So finally I decided that I can open up my own sales topic. I'm selling source for any protocol - If I don't have source, I will need you to provide whole system folder or for Essence/main - provide me protocol number. Sources are acquired by my OWN decompiler - written in Java, so we're not using popular UEExplorer upgraded by anyone. Decompiler extracts already compile ready sources. It outputs clean code, however constants are mapped 60-70%. Why only 60-70%? Well tl;dr when you compile any sources, they take at that time constant value and place it instead of = CONST_NAME to = THAT_CONST_NAME_VALUE, so it's not possible to have const name instead of value. Example of output: https://pastebin.com/cjyXcJvT for bigger .uc class (557p). p.s pastebin messed up encoding, but KR symbols are preserved - you won't see "?" symbols, rather you will see proper original korean text. I will give you guide as well, how not to mess it up with your editor VS Code/Notepad++ or what you use it to make them preserve it. You will get source + my compiler wrapper (written in java) - works on Windows/Mac/Linux - it has small GUI but supports CLI. Small notice, who thinks 'this is decompiled source' - basically all sources that are on sale are made by decompiling .u and applying changes. I think powerhouse few years ago was ArtToKill/kick (kick added support for INT64 to the publicly available compiler sources) etc. So no - there are no straight from 'creator' sources anywhere, all sellers offer the same - just the quality is different. UEExplorer upgraded was a big step, however, it introduces still a lot of nesting, if statements wrapping incorrectly which could lead to bugs. There are many things how to identify poor quality sources, as if the seller tries to sell 'out-of-box' when they see it compiles - sad news, some bugs are in the logic due to seller focusing only on 'it compiles' rather than issues that their decompiler is not capable so solve. On request I can restore ±100% const mapping.   Later I can attach compiled .u to try. Price is 400EUR. Payment methods USDT (Crypto). I'm still in debate with myself, wether to start selling XDat Editor with structures and ClientDat with 100% all files openings (no unk namings) and improved experience (such as comments support in .dat files, mass sync, improved performance and so on). P.s. If you ask me to give you some project's custom interface - the price may vary - there are couple things per project that need to be hand checked and adjusted (for example Innadril completely changes tokens which then I need to adjust my program to their token Ids). So it might take more time = more money. P.s.s. I have more things in the garage, like my own dsetup source that can allow you 'unlocking' system with your desired encrypting - you don't need to wait till 'patched' systems start appearing and so on, but I think at this time everyone who needs it make them selves it. AAC crypt removals and so on, BuildZone, everything that 'unlocks' client, however, I don't plan to make them on sale as mentioned, everyone can do them.  
    • It has been a while since I updated this thread. I am currently actively working on a full-scale port of the shader library to ensure the fast and accurate transfer of all effects. I have decompiled the original game and created a tool that fully logs the entire *Lineage 2 Interlude* particle system. This allows me to extract the original formulas hardcoded into the game, resulting in a high-fidelity port. For instance, *Lineage 2* uses an `appRnd` system that generates unique randomization patterns for different skills, giving them distinct visual characteristics; there are countless formulas and technical nuances like this. Ultimately, I will derive all the key formulas and replicate the geometry with high precision. Twelve basic geometry formulas have already been ported. The effect was created in 10 minutes using a .uc file, HLSL formulas, and SpriteEmitter particle blending formulas.   https://prnt.sc/_3UDLQVX_Y-_
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..