Jump to content

Please vote +1 for staying as Moderator  

203 members have voted

  1. 1. Please vote +1 for staying as Moderator

    • Luapman
      5
    • `Romeo
      48
    • Observer
      11
    • JaharakaL
      4
    • United
      3
    • Doll
      4
    • CorLeoNe
      4
    • Necro
      6
    • Zake
      36
    • minideed
      4
    • fokys
      5
    • Kяaσh
      23
    • claww
      4
    • Nicolás™
      26
    • RєVєnGeR^
      20


Recommended Posts

Posted

Botfights between romeo and nicolas, cewl.

i never use bot here cause i never had a bot here cause of ban

Nicolas and claww will be SHIT moderators, you heard me right.

 

Moderator -> stable, adequate, NEUTRAL person who can help, wont take opportunistic actions, lie, & be rude. These 2 do not fall into this characteristics. Just create new account and try to work with them and you will see. Nicolas is doing some services, while claww is selling his pack. Test them and you will see. In this voting new members cannot prove themselves and noone cannot guarantee that selected ones wont be obsessed with opportunism in the future. Next time, please, think of some other method how to select moderators(example: contest based on answers, motivation letter + xx days testing with monitoring that moderator job -> replies and etc).

 

GL HF.

Which my service mate? the most here doing service, if you are right on your job why to don't have service.

On other forums the guys who is the most on their services takes the positions.

 

Thanks

Posted

Ι don't care about the votes which i will get , but for sure few of the listed moderators will use bot to increase their score.

Posted

Ι don't care about the votes which i will get , but for sure few of the listed moderators will use bot to increase their score.

 

for sure i dont care about voting..

Posted

Dunno u are not popular here is not possible to get that number of votes.

 

i have many Members Friends but not from real life here i dont ask for Votes really i dont need it.

Posted

Voted for Romeo, hes a cool guy and probably the fresh meat that this community is needing since months!

 

PW: And im not his friend  ::)

 

all members here think i have bot accounts and i vote my self. thanks.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad nevermind, i got what you mean, here's the fix   https://drive.google.com/file/d/1av7OHaGSdnVQtcBgb9MhtiIkxVXy3P2y/view?usp=sharing   CanIngnoreCollision=True CanBeIngnoredCollision=True  
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..