mcbigmac

No - you don't. Streaks does nothing. It gets set to Streak (Killammount value) - and then to set 0. Your effectively doing: X +=1; if(x=y) z=x; z=0; repeat. Z is worthless and does nothing.

It's still really poor general implementation of logic. "Streaks" is completely irrelevant as an object - and should be removed, waste of memory. and "Streak" will increase constantly over time - making a systemmessage each kill until death.

You have everything to prove. The sooner you realize that - and also learn a bit more articulated non-agressive english - the quicker you will be able to sell your supposed work. Right now your digging your own grave - and as others have have said your most likely doing that because your pack has near zero % value.

....i spy with my little eye - a programmatic logical error :O Seriously - if people can't articulate and keep calm to prove their supposed innocence - then ban. And someone get nick to authorize a new ruleset for packs - so crap like this is avoided.

A downgrade is infinetely easier. A shitload of systems written and integrated ALOT better than Kiv, denis, me, james, dawid combined - could not do better than ncsoft. You just have to nop out, and change smaller steps in algorhythms and functions and smaller return hooks. The GF Core is so much more better structured\organized\coded - and 100x more stable. (Just like C4 Core is 100x better than working with the C1 core). C4>HB makes ZERO SENSE to anyone knowledged in how the daemons work - when GF is availeble. Due to the nature of how structured internal systems i'd even consider GF>IL rather than C4>IL. It shows you don't know much stuff is oddly inlined and not grouped in a more ... "intelligent" way making changing logic so much easier. Unless you have the years of work denis\kiv & dawid have - i'd consider it. How the hell are you going to extract informations from Nextdev\LA2Guard without knowledge of RCE? How the hell are you going to match hooks and offsets on objects - without verifying in L2Server in the first place? There's possibly only design angle to gain - if your completely lost on how to design\hook and add a custom system.

....That has to be the stupidest thing i've heard in a while. It's like deciding to write your own Interlude extender from scratch - when your goal is just to run a interlude server for quick money. Investment does not even remotely match ROI. and NextDev was notorious for tons of systematic errors from logic changes to calculations. Granted there was no other product on the market back then. ...but do tell me a how dumped (and unvirtualizing the critical sections from arma too!) DLL is going to get anyone closer to writing their own ext?

...then you should be able to do what i said. To prove there's no exchange of said code listed in your incoming balance for code in question.

I often wonder why in nearly 7-8 years l2j and\or someone with a really premium fork hasn't paid to research exactly how stuff is calculated in the real binaries. And is one of the reasons L2J no matter what people do - will fundamentally be very un-retail and in-correct. "Balance" is a word that should not exist at all - NCSoft per definition is relatively perfect. Odd.

I'm always inclined to be believe respectful and carefully worded accusations rather than the typical idiots who can barely speak english. ....but there seems to be a massive difference from his use of words when posting the evidence that stewie scammed him - to his post now. This is curious - also his constant barrage of negative words don't work in his favour. Correct me if i'm wrong - but doesn't PSC like PP have a list of all transactions on the account? Wouldn't stewie be able screenshot fully (no halfarse stuff) - his entire incoming PSC wallet to prove his innonence? ...and if so - why haven't you done this stewie? It's possible Zemantis got scammed by whomever gave him the code as by the sound of it.... it wasn't his original one.

This is not ask and someone will code it place. Learn to create NASC - it will save you time in the end.

Now that i look at it again - i'm actually confuzzled. That was until i noticed this... fetch_iS881. "l2Bbuffer002.htm" If that's not a copy paste error by you, well there's your error.

People look at GF and C4 AI and see no major differences - and there aren't. But string assigning like that could have changed, find a native example in both and check. There's no way to know requesting html by AI - as far as i remember. Such info is simply not saved in memory in either daemons.

Re-run any given scripts - cause you fucked up running them originally somehow.

So let me get this straight - you not knowing shit about the language use a compiler for something completely different and replace only IDs. Yet expect it to work like magic? The fact that you don't register this as bad - or think "okay can't use c4 compiler" is scary. Syntax looks correct per NASC - so get a GF compiler and see if the output is different. (I'm assuming by logic - it will have to be as param syntax matches other uses of s0 in GF). Most probably error is the assigning to s0 - that does not look GF alike natively.

While i applaud posting of your test - posting without the specific error or info on when in the process shit goes wrong - makes stuff very hard to help with.

You might wanna focus on the first red errors rather the last. Seems to suggest there's something wrong with the Castle DB Tables.

Don't run l2 servers. You too untelligent for l2j and l2off - if you can't get past the hurdles you describe. Basics are not complex - and you dont seem to possess any ability to judge who's worth your time and what you want to offer players. That leaves you even with the best technical platform\developer - un-appealing to players. Friendly advice.

it's not my oppinion. It's fact - that ability to pull the right players\clans\marketing\buzz\bullshit\street cred does it. Simple as that - players aka you don't reward the right things. You keep a bad cycle going. Most do anyway.

Good luck to you then. But neither quality of the technical part - nor the balance or anything related to the actual gameplay makes a server big nowadays. You should be fair warned on that.

If you've got extensive knowledge and been backers for a other servers - you'll know how AMAZINGLY little value you are right now. Aka why the hell should anyone care?

....like search for how to do basic shit with client? Come on.

When one adds an event tag to a spawn maker - and said event is not enabled.....geuss what happens?

....yes nop it in l2server from doing anything. Seems like a fairly odd request however.

.... and hence your problem. You can't make up and design your perfect product for your own scenario\situation - and expect someone to do just that for you because you think it's fair. But whenever you give up on that - you can always ask again :)

If it's for private usage - why care about bugs\exploits? As long as it's retail - for private playtime, grab the normal leak and test loose. Either way your not getting what you want perfectly without paying - think i'm the only one still developing a clean c4 ext with mods\fixes.