Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This space is given for free by Sido.

 

It is sometimes down or laggy, but hey, it's free :).

 

Make bookmark on timeline if you want last news when forum is down :P.

 

If there are too much problems, I will reuse the old forum.

 

----

 

Revision 41 strikes back :)

Posted

every skill can be used without or with any weapon. maybe it's because of the unkown wep type? also i noticed that Wrath skill does 0 dmg... or isn't it supposted to make any dmg?

Posted

every skill can be used without or with any weapon. maybe it's because of the unkown wep type? also i noticed that Wrath skill does 0 dmg... or isn't it supposted to make any dmg?

All reports/questions & answers to forum. >.>

 

Posted

Wrath does damage to CPs, and only to CPs (mobs have CPs where you play ?).

 

For weapon restriction, if you can't read timeline, I can nothing for ya.

 

The skill refactor will be longer than I expected, as I need to refactor items aswell.

Posted

Wrath does damage to CPs, and only to CPs (mobs have CPs where you play ?).

 

For weapon restriction, if you can't read timeline, I can nothing for ya.

 

The skill refactor will be longer than I expected, as I need to refactor items aswell.

The Best or one of the best int projects out there :D
Posted

why don't you announce new revs? i mean 44 and 45. also why don't you continue on skills and let enterworld or others after skills....

Posted

Well, since the time, you should know the forum address :P.

 

Changesets' comments are written in forum, in the Announcement section.

 

About how I develop, what's the matter ? I would like to see you checking skills one by one on XML... I don't say that as a reproach, as I was aware about the work charge amount since the very beginning, but it's easy to wait for people to make your own fork / server on my project.

 

I'm preparing rev 46, and unfortunately for ya, it has nothing to see with skills :

> Friendlist / blocklist complete refactor

> Locked subclasses (bb exploits)

> L2Party refactor

> L2PcInstance doDie refactor (many improvements in clan wars formula)

> And many, many fixes/checks + retail messages.

 

If you want it goes faster, you can help correcting missing XMLs. Core is made, so for me the missing DP part is... "optional". Note the use of " " before crying, lol. Some skills need enchantement routes, according to website. And it's long to check what it was existing from what it wasn't.

 

The good new is I finally won't make the item refactor (at least not right now), as it goes really bad to add/correct 10 others XMLs + skills ones. I hate XMLs. So in next revisions, I will revert back the item restriction "engine". That should make all rewritten skills worked perfectly.

 

If you feel this topic is empty without comments of changesets, you can copy paste from the forum. You will help me make the topic "survive" :). Once again, as a simple spectator, don't expect I listen you.

Posted

also why don't you continue on skills and let enterworld or others after skills....

Reason;

Oh I get it,You need a "victim" ( Tryskell) to do all work for you,and then you ll take this project as based and you will fack up it with your customs.

Right;

Anyway.

Posted

Reason;

Oh I get it,You need a "victim" ( Tryskell) to do all work for you,and then you ll take this project as based and you will fack up it with your customs.

Right;

Anyway.

Not even? Skills that Tryskell reworked have already been tested, i mean c'mon it's 3 xmls = 1 hour test. I have tested most of the skills, and they didn't have any errors. Also, i didn't like that 'fack up it with your customs', if i ever open a server, and l2jaCis is finished(i thing you know what i mean when i say finished), i wouldn't add all useless sh1ts, but only those who would be important for my server. So stop being the 'clever' guy here.

Posted

Not even? Skills that Tryskell reworked have already been tested, i mean c'mon it's 3 xmls = 1 hour test. I have tested most of the skills, and they didn't have any errors.

Nobody said that there are errors at skills.

Tryskell asked to review "behavior" of skills or if something is not right.

Posted

Nobody said that there are errors at skills.

Tryskell asked to review "behavior" of skills or if something is not right.

Doesn't this need a test? I guess it needs, and since skills are copied from freya, which as it seems doesn't have errors (not as much as interlude), they shouldn't have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..