Jump to content

[L2Off / L2J] Another Crappy Bot Protection Starting From 55€ (Interlude / High Five)


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Any news about Vang's ext ?

HOP HOP ?

 

As discussed on skype.


 

Special

 

The next 2 customers will get the antibot with lifetime license for 75€ (valid for l2j version and until 12 Feb.)

Edited by Asmodeus
Posted

Regarding l2off, We have talked with Vanganth and he agreed to implement acbp server side in his extender. I have sent him the instructions for the changes I need to be done and waiting for the resultz.


About h5 I won't start developing it until I see there is interest on buying it.

 


 

New pricing scheme!

interesting.. waiting for ur answer.
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Lifetime license is the biggest mistake. Monthly payment keeps developers updating the product.

  • Extra month of support and updates: 10€

So he got a monthly fee.

Posted (edited)

Lifetime license is the biggest mistake. Monthly payment keeps developers updating the product.

 

My plan was to make a affordable but working antibot solution. When the clientbase I desire will be reached I will stop accepting new customers and work only with the existing ones. I have already declined subscription for 3 potential clients due to either newbieness or lameness.

 

So as you understand money is not my priority. I'm not living of this. Monthly fee enslaves the developer to provide constant support, something I try to avoid, due to lack of time. I prefer to work with people who have a little bit of general computer usage to avoid explaining every single crap.

 

I offer open source server side for handling stuff, which is a basic implemention of a hwid/multibox/ban system. If I had a monthly fee and I'd accept newbies my skype would be spammed the whole day, with questions such as "how to limit olympiad with HWID?", "how to set different ban time for phx?", and such..

 

I think you got my point.

 

Best regards, thanks for your suggestion.

Edited by Asmodeus
Posted

Just to you know, Im still waiting for hi5 version ^^ Im keeping on eye here (:

 

If you are really interested in the h5 version we could talk about it in private, the reason is that I don't like to "cook food" to "eat it" myself.

Posted

If you are really interested in the h5 version we could talk about it in private, the reason is that I don't like to "cook food" to "eat it" myself.

Can you send me a pm with your skype? :)

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks
    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.
    • Your project doesn't compare to aCis; you have to be an idiot to use that. I know someone who bought the High Five "PREMIUM" version, which has the same bugs as the free version. If you want, I can share his latest premium version. Players are going through walls with their bad geoengine, falling under the Olympiad. If you want, I can record and prove what I'm saying. The aCis project is 50 steps ahead of yours and it's not even stable...
    • l2jteon, l2joneo l2jscoria etc etc. and from that we went to this 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock