Jump to content

Promotion - Demotion [13 December 2013] Public Talk


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

better love story than twilight volume 2

 

such feelings much love

 

Continue your childish behaviour.

I dont think that is love anymore smart boy wrd.

But the truth. 

Edited by Universe
Posted (edited)

heard some good words from the drunk noble and thinks he is the grandmaster

 

holy fk i dont wanna live on this planet anymore

 

Now he is drunk? Haha nice joke.

Good night 

Edited by Universe
Posted

It's that time of the year again T_T

 

Activity is not enough. Knowledge on a certain field is also necessary.

I'm not referring to any suggestions made specifically, just reminding you that activity is not the only criterion that needs to be met for someone to become a moderator.

In this case, he should promote only active people. Fuck maturity and such, you need people posting all over boards.
Except for 2-3 global moderators that should have the maturity criterion.

Posted

It's that time of the year again T_T

 

In this case, he should promote only active people. Fuck maturity and such, you need people posting all over boards.

Except for 2-3 global moderators that should have the maturity criterion.

 

 

You were not here in 08'-10', were you? That's the era when mods were being promoted depending on their activity, rather than their ability to judge situations fairly. And guess what. It marked the beginning of the end. Even mods themselves, often had disagreements on punishment decisions. The forum was separated in 2 sides. 

Posted

Not having people be able to judge situations seems like a recipe for disaster.

 

Why is it not possible to get active people - and people whom can go thru all the countless bullshit and wars ?

 

 

Define a new clear ruleset for the forum about what is allowed and what is not.

What is good conduct - and what is idiotic trolling.

 

 

Having active mods won't bring more activity to the forum - that's a completely different problem.

Many of posting here seem to think it's the same thing when it's not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..