Jump to content

Please vote +1 for staying as Moderator  

203 members have voted

  1. 1. Please vote +1 for staying as Moderator

    • Luapman
      5
    • `Romeo
      48
    • Observer
      11
    • JaharakaL
      4
    • United
      3
    • Doll
      4
    • CorLeoNe
      4
    • Necro
      6
    • Zake
      36
    • minideed
      4
    • fokys
      5
    • Kяaσh
      23
    • claww
      4
    • Nicolás™
      26
    • RєVєnGeR^
      20


Recommended Posts

Posted

i am not judging anything i am just giving out some truths existing. w/e

 

Its boorin mate keep your truths for yourself and leave the people alone really.

Posted

Hi Maxtor,

 

I will just give my PoV about the organization :

  • making that vote public makes it useless, as, some ppl said already, you can create fake account, use your dualboxes or simply ask to your friends to help you.
  • someone being banned / heavily dekarmaed *for any reason* in the past shouldn't be considered as being part of moderation. It will just create problems, either about being trust, power abuse and general kid behaviors.
  • making directly a vote when those ppl couldn't have time to moderate sounds... Awkward, at best.

 


 

I invite you to make as follow, you're free to follow/adapt it following your tastes :

 

  • One month challenge, with X ppls removed of the list every week - depending of the numbers of contesters). Exemple, on a list of 20 contesters, you will drop 4 per week (last week = 4 final moderators "alive", as you dropped 4*4 before).
  • The challenge shouldn't be public at all. But ppl complaining about abuses of one of the wannabee moderator to existing moderators should be taken in consideration, if the abuse exists.
  • The worst challengers should be chosen following :

  1. the number and QUALITY of moderation actions they did (ppl abusing of that criteria could be penalized)
  2. their participation on the forum (either as a regular user than as moderator answering questions)
  3. realized good ideas , if any (big bonus)
  4. abuse reports, if any (big malus)
  5. * add any eventual criteria if you got *

 

 


 

Finally, from the list you show, I know only really few ppl, as I busy only about L2J section. An exemple of how "corrupted" your vote system is : I know only Minideed, and he helped my L2J pack. I know also he is trusty guy. So I will vote for him, even if I don't know if he is good moderator.

 

As you can see my vote is biased. The point is, if "X" got 10 boxes + 30 friends, he got 40 votes. No matter how terrible in moderation he will be.

 

I hope you got my point. I voted anyway if you don't want to change your system :).

 

Regards,

 

Tk.

Posted

i still think this is only infor poll for admin how many friend we have, cause gm can see your work for forum, and he will decide no this poll

Posted

i still think this is only infor poll for admin how many friend we have, cause gm can see your work for forum, and he will decide no this poll

 

Dude no hate but i think Maxtor wanted moderators who speak fluent english, and we are not a server here to have Game Masters.

Posted

Nicolas and claww will be SHIT moderators, you heard me right.

 

Moderator -> stable, adequate, NEUTRAL person who can help, wont take opportunistic actions, lie, & be rude. These 2 do not fall into this characteristics. Just create new account and try to work with them and you will see. Nicolas is doing some services, while claww is selling his pack. Test them and you will see. In this voting new members cannot prove themselves and noone cannot guarantee that selected ones wont be obsessed with opportunism in the future. Next time, please, think of some other method how to select moderators(example: contest based on answers, motivation letter + xx days testing with monitoring that moderator job -> replies and etc).

 

GL HF.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad nevermind, i got what you mean, here's the fix   https://drive.google.com/file/d/1av7OHaGSdnVQtcBgb9MhtiIkxVXy3P2y/view?usp=sharing   CanIngnoreCollision=True CanBeIngnoredCollision=True  
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..