mcbigmac

Such coding skills as opening the source and seeing clear plain text comments about hooks for dvamp exe and "native openpp" exe side by side?

Or learning why it happens, and then fixing it proper. Trade dupes occurs because of the temp itemlists that are created during trade. ANYTHING that modifies a TRADEABLE and STACKABLE item during a trade (Where trade copies a temporary inventory item list over) = dupe. Such as.. moving item to pet inventory, watching olympiad matches when it cost money (modifying adena), Using a soulshot(soulshot consumes X of itself), using any Item that consumes itself etc etc etc. Even a Skill that consumes a specific item as requirement can be used to dupe, as long as that item is stackable. That's how it works. Now go think of new creative ways to do this. PS: Eagleboy - Your problem is hardware lag, and or coep being written badly. Most likely a combination. COEP is like L2J, openly contributed. While some work is done by people with heavy knowledge, some parts arent. Those parts can in the worst case scenario cause massive bottlenecks when code is executed many times. Also, i seem to faintly recall some sort of ASPD limit in C4 - also some problems with the algorhythm not programmed to consider such high values. Maybe i'm wrong, and someone else can clarify.

There are some geodata loading limits - that it won't load and crap out errors with. If it's steel citadel specificly can't remember But hopefully you'd know by startup load errors if your geo for steel citadel doesn't load , or if you have it in the first place. Else, scary.

C4 Leaks are optimised for windows 2003 and build for it. 2008 wasn't availeble when it was build. So yes. Certain fixes exist, but they ultimately cause memory leaks and crash stability on higher pressure(Or so people say).

Alternatively use brain and remove the affected class. Take it out manually and figure out why it breaks (new dvamp events, functions and then change to some working id to get in nasc form).

I can't quite remember if the i7 processors matter. You could ask yourself what kind of hosting company your at, when they offer you servers with consumer/desktop based processors in their servers in the firstplace(Read - shitty). Nehalem based processors work fine in the Xeon lines, so i don't see why the i7 shouldn't. There could be, knowing intel, be some instruction set differences, causing l2server or any extender to go poop. Which would require lots of manual research to figure out where and change it proper. Second of all, software raid is retarded if your going for HD write speed(which is one of the bottlenecks, atleast in heavy demanding populated l2off servers) - and you'll never ever NEED 3 tb of space. (nor more than 12 gb of ram, at an ansolute max). It's more than enough to run an L2Off server, with the exception of win2008. Since you'll probably never go above 500 or 1k constant players - unless maybe if you get the hype factor from the dumb l2 kids who like to bandwagon every 3 months.

Core.dll mod required. C4 Isn't compiled to run on vista/7. Try search for it or try some c4 servers with it. Or even fyyre?

dl a l2j pack, go there, loc coordinates?

sysstring-e + htmls + one of fyyre's dlls for unicode support for the correct chars :) start translating.

That's because you a lazy dumb kid who didn't search. If you did youd find answer to your questions.

A filter is not exactly a firewall. Here's a little lesson for all the kids in l2j and l2off and the ddos protection that extenders provide. Imagine you have a tunnel that fits 2 cars at a time per second. If you send down 4 cars to it a second, we get a traffic jam, or a "denial of service" for the tunnel. If we however put up some police and check/stop before the tunnel that rejects cars made in america, we might however cut down the traffic to 2 cars a second. However again, if we then get 6 cars, and the police/check/stop can only filter half or 2 cars - we again have a block. No matter how much you put infront of that tunnel, it can be blocked and ddos can occur. The difference is where it occurs. If your machine has 59435094054 ram, and you use 10000. There's no reason not to reject and control the traffic at your server - wether network level, Windows/os level or even in l2server/extender. Sameway if you buy a super duper cisco firewall, with an amazingly fast cpu and a throughput of 500 Mbit. If someone sends 1000 mbit - the cisco dies and so does your tunnel(l2server). There will always be a bottle neck.

No, not even the slightest sense. Good BR fail tho. That disables ip filters for ips logging on a builder defined Character. Nothing of which he asks. Login flag, must be set to 16... or was it 0x16? one of the two.

Seems extremely unserious. Fits for the l2j kids i geuss. If you wanted something serious, you should know the "scene" and who's kicking ass atm - contact them, and propose your vision and begin. If you yourself have no knowledge of a subject, how the hell will you judge them?

As it says. ODBC cannot find your entire SQL server. Judging by your complete lack of any sort of troubleshooting skills: Remember to put ODBC information into the 32bit folder, instead of native 64bit. L2server = 64bit, CacheD = 32bit.

Long ago in c1. Switching from l2j to C2 modded. I think 5 years ish ago - maybe 4,5?. Sina was out before Meifu i remember, and the korean files were not very user friendly. Not that i did much but changing a few numbers in text files ,and still managed to screw that up - alot too. I believe we called it L2Max. Infact later on Anarchy dropped by and displayed why not to open a cached port ;). (And that was before people thought of injecting via it - luckily - coulda completely lost a server there!).

That's the problem. You don't answer to anyone. Neither do any of the kids, or the other l2revenge server for that matter. The sheep get so lost when they don't have any kind of way to establish any claim in l2off anymore. No one challenges anything cause no one really knows anything. Even in your earlier servers when you payed a certain someone to do some php scripts - even if you did check them - you probably wouldn't have noticed anything that smelled like foulplay It's a sad circle.

Yes however, you gladly take credit for something you didn't do. And features that aren't done by you. If dvampire wasn't publicly known or kation/vang you'd prolly say you created it all yourself. Now that it is public, your just marketing features and ever so avoiding the question if you actually did anything yourself. Hence the point - nothing but money hungry famewhores left to run servers. That's however mainly cause there's no players left worth running a server for, but that's another matter. And if you actually just wanted a good interlude server, you'd create one - not rip off a ton of server's build up name and credit to the playing base.

Thats' funny cause creating a new monster, linking a Texture model to it, and making it drop a few new items really does sound like it. Atleast GTH and his weird custom world really did custom things. If people applaud adding "more" to already crafted systems by ncsoft (wether they do it balanced or not) amazingly custom - you really can't expect much can you? It's not like ANY of the "custom servers" go for create completely new gameplay (As much as it now is possible) ideas that are fun. Or give people extra choices how to "grind" trade advance or supply a need to make choices how to move through the game - as compared to grind, level, belittle your opponent.

An actual developer. Not that kids would know anything bout the history of l2off or the scene ;)

http://www.w3schools.com/sql/sql_delete.asp

What's funny is both sides claiming knowledge when they have none. That of course doesn't matter to the blind kids, the fanbois (of both sides mind you) or spectators. Oh woe is the l2off scene on both ends. It's like a real intarnetz soap drama - all live here!

Did you consider searching, finding something extremely similar, learning and then changing a bit? oh wait i didn't serve everything on a silver platter. excuse me, ignore me!

Seriously smeli, are you delusional again? Do you prefer to run 3,5INCH Floppies and 486 processors? It was afterall before dual cores, 2003 and giga ram and clock speeds. Therefor it's best! It's like bitchslapping evolution and rejecting everything the human race has achieved. Stop being so utterly retarded. Are you ever gonna grow up? You may prefer c1 or c2 or wahtever, which is fine. Just accept that others like to drive cars from this century and not Karl Benz's velo from 1984. (Above picture displays Smeli's preferred choice of transport - Because it's only fun to travel when the journey is longer than the stay itself!)

there isn't a solution when people don't post enough info, or are simply not smart enough to do so. And funnily enough i did post a solution. If you read up on these things, you'd know what the /3gb switch means, and when and where you can actually use it.

More expose your massive lack thereof. Might wanna read up on 64bit vs 32bit OS' within Microsoft.