Hello everyone.

 

Is it worthy having to share the source code of L2JLucera? Are people looking for them? I have a source code from 2018. If people are interested for the newest version, please send me on a PM all the jars of your pack or your project and I will get the source code out of it.

 

Update:

I've got the message. Here is the link for Lucera 1.7

https://www.mediafire.com/file/b3jmpwbrq321zmx/LuceraL2_1-7.zip/file

Edited March 21, 20206 yr by xFranky

Hem, as we all know, sources are for people who (want and) knows how to make changes, how to code. So, yes for such people sources is a must and nice to have. But those people won't choose lucera bcs of no sources and if they want to check some parts of code, they can do it through jar.

What I want to say is, if you share sources only wannabe admins will get benefits out of it.

 

But well, why not. Shits happening since years so that won't hurt l2 community 

Edited February 24, 20206 yr by SweeTs

On 2/24/2020 at 4:45 PM, SweeTs said:

Hem, as we all know, sources are for people who (want and) knows how to make changes, how to code. So, yes for such people sources is a must and nice to have. But those people won't choose lucera bcs of no sources and if they want to check some parts of code, they can do it through jar.

What I want to say is, if you share sources only wannabe admins will get benefits out of it.

 

But well, why not. Shits happening since years so that won't hurt l2 community 

 

It is just that I hear that Lucera is the best and you cannot find the source code, there are restrictions, nobody has ever managed to get the source code, but it was a matter of 5 minutes to break it from a jar file into multiple, and high readable source code without issues. People keep saying that all the L2J projects apart from lucera have a really bad skill system because they are made out of Java, which doesn't make sense, and seen the skills on the source code it is obvious that lucera doesn't defer at all. They are also made out of Java. I believe this will break this ice and the rumours and it will be fun sharing it.

 

Thank you for your suggestion!

Edited February 25, 20206 yr by xFranky

@vampir shared once, like last year or 2 yeors back, the sources code of lucera.

What the Lucera you are talking? Lucera 1, Lucera 2 or Lucera 3?

6 hours ago, Rootware said:

What the Lucera you are talking? Lucera 1, Lucera 2 or Lucera 3?

According to the commend below, it is Lucera 1.7 but any version is crackable if I get hold of the .jar

 

@xFranky i think Lucera isn't worth the attention he is given. This project was shared a lot of times and conceptual in core don't contains something unique from developer side. Usual L2J Server the epoch of 2006 year.

Edited February 25, 20206 yr by Rootware

a

Edited October 1, 20215 yr by Elfocrash

CBA to create a new topic. Here is the download link:

https://www.mediafire.com/file/b3jmpwbrq321zmx/LuceraL2_1-7.zip/file

Edited February 25, 20206 yr by xFranky

16 minutes ago, xFranky said:

CBA to create a new topic. Here is the download link:

https://www.mediafire.com/file/b3jmpwbrq321zmx/LuceraL2_1-7.zip/file

 

Well, what make you think this is the sources of Lucera? you just used Procyon Decompile!! 

 

Well, honestly I would rather use @vampir Share sources He did a year ago. At least He spent time to decompile and fixed the entire pack, well almost everything but close enough to work with.

 

Cheers

10 minutes ago, Akar0 said:

 

Well, what make you think this is the sources of Lucera? you just used Procyon Decompile!! 

 

Well, honestly I would rather use @vampir Share sources He did a year ago. At least He spent time to decompile and fixed the entire pack, well almost everything but close enough to work with.

i just said I was going to share the source code of Lucera, and that I needed the jar files to take'em out. If I wanted to hide that I used this decompiler, I would have used my editor that takes 30 seconds to get rip of all the decompiler tags.

 

Finally, I don't see any problem with the source code. It is normally readable, as you would see it on a normal project. You need more time to spend to double check it but I said, I can't be asked (CBA) to make a topic about it so I just posted it here. I was planning to test it and check it but I changed my mind, cuz was not really worth of my time. Never used Lucera and never will be.

if you can share the l2jlucera pack + surce here but to work actualy... all files i have download of l2jlucera isn't work

 

Whenever someone asks for feedback about Lucera, if it is good or not, I see people saying that it is rubbish, that has the wrong formulas, that, but when someone who has the source appears, everyone falls in weight wanting to

51 minutes ago, leonardoll174 said:

 

Whenever someone asks for feedback about Lucera, if it is good or not, I see people saying that it is rubbish, that has the wrong formulas, that, but when someone who has the source appears, everyone falls in weight wanting to

 

They want ... to evaluate this "miracle" in order to understand why is paying so much attention to it. This is the only reason for the hype around this sources. Correct me if i'm wrong.

52 minutes ago, Rootware said:

Correct me if i'm wrong.

You are wrong