xFranky

VIP Member
  • Content Count

    326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Community Reputation

7 Neutral

2 Followers

About xFranky

  • Rank
    Elder

Profile Information

  • Current Mood
    Careless
  • Gender
    Male
  • Country
    United Kingdom
  • Location
    London
  • Interests
    Music, Dancing, Programming, Designing, studying and riding my motorcycle!

Recent Profile Visitors

902 profile views
  1. Trusted person. Saved my *ss from a Layer 4 & 7, with a lot of hours looking for solution and staying awake for extra hours!
  2. I am happy to see people who care for the community and share. I believe your share will improve people's imagination. Great work!
  3. i just said I was going to share the source code of Lucera, and that I needed the jar files to take'em out. If I wanted to hide that I used this decompiler, I would have used my editor that takes 30 seconds to get rip of all the decompiler tags. Finally, I don't see any problem with the source code. It is normally readable, as you would see it on a normal project. You need more time to spend to double check it but I said, I can't be asked (CBA) to make a topic about it so I just posted it here. I was planning to test it and check it but I changed my mind, cuz was not really worth of my time. Never used Lucera and never will be.
  4. CBA to create a new topic. Here is the download link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/b3jmpwbrq321zmx/LuceraL2_1-7.zip/file
  5. According to the commend below, it is Lucera 1.7 but any version is crackable if I get hold of the .jar
  6. It is just that I hear that Lucera is the best and you cannot find the source code, there are restrictions, nobody has ever managed to get the source code, but it was a matter of 5 minutes to break it from a jar file into multiple, and high readable source code without issues. People keep saying that all the L2J projects apart from lucera have a really bad skill system because they are made out of Java, which doesn't make sense, and seen the skills on the source code it is obvious that lucera doesn't defer at all. They are also made out of Java. I believe this will break this ice and the rumours and it will be fun sharing it. Thank you for your suggestion!
  7. Hello everyone. Is it worthy having to share the source code of L2JLucera? Are people looking for them? I have a source code from 2018. If people are interested for the newest version, please send me on a PM all the jars of your pack or your project and I will get the source code out of it. Update: I've got the message. Here is the link for Lucera 1.7 https://www.mediafire.com/file/b3jmpwbrq321zmx/LuceraL2_1-7.zip/file
  8. In his words. Also he has an agreement with maxtor where no link that leads to his pack including the sourced is allowed to be shared on MxC, apart from his link, whether it is customised or not.
  9. Hello @Trance. I am sorry about that. Silly me! Initially, my project concept or idea was not to create a derival of aCis, but about a group of multiple but separated from one another, up-to-date and available features, which aims people that are looking for a particular feature. The advantages were to reduce the developer's time on looking for the features that are hard to be found either on MxC or Google, and they will not be out-of-date Part of this idea for the features was to be based on aCis for creating and building up those features, and make them available for multiple L2J packs that enables an easier adaptation of the code. In order to achieve this was to make use of GitHub. GitHub has a great engine for keeping a track of all the commits and, which allows me to either approve or amend commits as I see necessary. Additionally, everyone could contribute, without been told for what to do, when they are suitable and find free time. Therefore, I will have a total control about what is going on with the repositories, where any developer at any given point of time, can see all the commits and why they are made, in order to go ahead and update their code. The idea of "saving the community" was because I remember myself when I started l2 developing, while I had no knowledge of coding. I was able to search the forum to find what I was looking for and simply figure out how to make simple changes without harming anything else. The majority of the code was available to the public, and it gave me the opportunity of learning code. Nowadays, this has been reduced, and in order to get a feature, as simple as a PvP and PK colour (I just gave an example to justify what I mean as simple code) you have to pay someone between 20€ to 100€, even though it is just 20 max lines of code. I just wanted to encourage developers to be more open minded, and give away simple things, since they could earn the trust of the community, create a good reputation, potentially increase of their customers, improve their code and coding style as they will be getting suggestions of how they could improve in the future and helping the L2 development community to grow up again. This can give them a nice feeling for contributing and helping hundreds of people. When it comes to the engine which you mention, which is a great example, is easy and possible to be done. I just needed ideas and motivation, which are gone since a few days ago for something that have happened to me, so I am waiting them to come back and recover. I might have to take some time off from coding and drink a lot of Vodka. Idk. Nevertheless, I could just start by myself and if anyone wanted to commit, they would be more than welcome including yourself. However, there is an issue which I learned recently. We are not allowed to have any aCis source code and pack shared on MxC, after the request of @Tryskell to Maxtor, which forces me to respect his decision, therefore this idea with the GitHub is not possible, since I have to share the link of the repository, in order for the whole idea to work. I could alternatively have diff files available but the whole concept would be corrupted. If I had the "Ok" from either @Tryskell, @SweeTs or @Sido to share a link of their source files to the public, with the promise of keeping all the repositories up-to-date with the latest free available sources, this concept can revive again! However, it is unlikely to happen and therefore I might just discontinue this idea. Anyway, I like your idea and I will keep it in mind along with the advices you have given me on your post. I am thankful for that and for the time you have spent.
  10. I had way more than I could handle alcohol in my body last night. Now that I look at it, it was pointless. The worst I have come up with yet while I'm drunk in coding! Locked
  11. I am not too sure if this is going to fix ur issue but try this: if (receiver == null || receiver != null && receiver.getClient().isDetached() && !(receiver instanceof FakePlayer))
  12. If you are looking into importing a method from the Core.jar into your code, first of all, place the Core.jar into the dist folder. After than, look for a list to import "the library" Core.jar, which you can google. Once you do that, try to open the Core.jar with Winrar and see the folder. It could be like com.something.something, when it comes to its folders. this is how you can import it into your code. I am not sure however if this is what you are looking for.
  13. Please read the rules before you create a topic. You placed your topic on the marketplace, where other people advertise that they either want to buy or sell, while your topic is related to a l2 discussion rather than a sale. I have also fixed your prefixes!
  14. Thank each and everyone for their support, but I believe, it was a waste of time to ask people who would want to contribute in such a thing. Only a few people have responded positively, but I haven't seen anything. I will most likely start something by myself and let others just contribute, if they want, whenever they want, as I will be sharing my links to everyone. The way how I will make this is, I will come to the community to ask what features they would like to see, then I will be starting it myself, and when I feel is in an "okish" standard to be released, I will share the link to the public. If anyone has to suggest any correction, this will be welcomed on my GitHub Repositories, as for each feature I will be starting to work on, it will have its own repository.
  15. This won't happen. It will be actually quicker to have someone providing them to me, rather than expecting an answer from L2Topzone.