Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

 

 

gz, thanks to you I will not leave home for a month

 

thanks <3

Edited by xdem
Posted

deMEV:

 

Do you know if any developers worked on an way to read heightmaps off the .map files?

(open source, preferrebly)

 

Or has it always been privately shared since stazis began?

Posted

deMEV:

 

Do you know if any developers worked on an way to read heightmaps off the .map files?

(open source, preferrebly)

 

Or has it always been privately shared since stazis began?

don't know about this.

Posted (edited)

It's not difficult to edit/create it on your own.

 

 

imagine to work for client side and geodata for 1 month and then u open your server and everyone have your work for free  ..(not geodata work)

Edited by L2Rauntry
Posted

imagine to work for client side and geodata for 1 month and then u open your server and everyone have your work for free  ..(not geodata work)

You can always protect your files with encryptions.

Posted

imagine to work for client side and geodata for 1 month and then u open your server and everyone have your work for free  ..(not geodata work)

Maybe everything is not about money? This game is old as hell.

Guest Elfocrash
Posted

You can always protect your files with encryptions.

No you cant. Encryptions have to be both ways so the client can read them. That means they can get decrypted.

Posted (edited)

It is not about the money - it's about the rules. No one should get anything for free if it's author don't wan't him to use it. If someone made something fir HIS SERVER then it should stay on his server only.

If its author say You can use it, use it then. But if You don't have his permission then simply don't.

Edited by aVVe
Posted (edited)

It is not about the money - it's about the rules. No one should get anything for free if it's author don't wan't him to use it. If someone made something fir HIS SERVER then it should stay on his server only.

 

If its author say You can use it, use it then. But if You don't have his permission then simply don't.

And DRM is born.

 

Not that I disagree.

Edited by ericvini
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..