Tryskell

Test it on AdvExt ;).

Well, your opinion is based on the idea you can do everything alone, but a project of such scale can't be done alone. I need testers, I need some dedicated people to work on. How do you get your developers first, if your project is entirely private and got no funds ? How do you test issues ? Why I would simply bother doing public shares, if my point is to put it private ? You can't understand that since you never opened/led a project. You also probably never reworked any big feature, if you think any big core edition comes without any error. You speak about things you never experienced - like a virgin would speak about sex. People who paid for aCis perfectly know about the project : - In changeset 40 I deleted ALL skills. No skills were working. - In changeset 273 I deleted ALL scripts (Jython was deleted). None quest was working. Such move never bothered me. There is a road, and there is an end to it. Whatever time it takes. You said it yourself - if you're unhappy with something, code it. Boats are landing on ground ? Then pick your little hands, fix it, share with the community. You will get rewarded with either access or money. People who code on aCis simply share what they want to share. I can't force helpers to work on something they don't want to. Myself, I code what I want to code. You should be angry versus yourself - which do nothing - not versus me, who actually acts. PS : After a little search with your name, no mention of osvaldotl2015 over my forums. So you reported 0 issue, fixed 0 thing, contributed nothing. No mention in my excel file of old customers, so you probably never contributed financially aswell. Mention over L2JBrazil : https://www.l2jbrasil.com/topic/122190-~~woh-v3~~-by-dagger-based-in-acis-366-revision~~/ A pack, based on leaked aCis, full of customs. And for that you got 15 kudos. Strangely it was exactly what I said earlier. Unfortunately, you won't change my opinion about BRs, in general...

Warhammer Online emulator don't even have AIs (monsters don't use any type of skills), their heading isn't even fixed (they don't rotate) when they purchase a player. Such an emulator wouldn't be entirely fixed. If you can't understand that, than don't use an emulator. It's not really hard to understand than the work is gigantic, and if you spread doing shitty packs trying to prove you're an hero and fixed 10 issues while I fixed actually 800+ REPORTED issues (not counting my own work), than, yes development will be slow. Fortunately I'm helped by good people. About "boats on land", genius, I'm refactoring movement, trying to improve the gameplay. That won't be your L2JFrozen hotfix behavior. Strictly none teams, except L2JUnity, L2JFree and whatever main RU fork is used, actually did it. That's 3 forks, and mine. I would like you to open a L2JIL base, work on base vanilla L2JIL, and see in how many time you destroy your sources. I got the balls to break my project for a time, in order to improve it. I did it for scripts, for skills. I do it for movement. Also, you can actually rework boat movement and share with the community @osvaldotl2015. I'm rewarding people contributing, and that's a good contribution goal. That's because of people thinking like you than projects, in a general matter, move slower than they could and than open source system doesn't work. Taunting idiots, while their only contribution to a project is at best, to deliver 10€, no contributing and leaking it over a shitty forums OR use those leaked sources. That should almost be a Steam achievement ! Sure, but it's problematic than such people believe it. Anyway, as you say, this is no random users which are the problem (except the toxic behavior, which is annoying) - but developers splitting forces upon (almost) unused packs, trying to get some fame/honor/kudos while they simply could have the same amount of fame participating in what I consider one of the major IL project. If people were actually less egocentric, IL would be already finished and we would have already jumped into another chronicle. I count 2-3 years of active development left.

Well, the dogs bark but the caravan moves on. Literally ! :) I made 100€/month for the last 8 years with that project. It basically covered my internet connection, whcih is 50€/month. If I wanted to make money, I would simply work IRL. 10€ / hour in France, that's 10 hours of work in my country. And I worked way more than 10 hours per month on this project. People got simply no clues at all. Freakin dogs.

aCis freemium concept evolved around June 2021 - the money fee is bigger than before (100€ initial fee + 10€/month), but you got access to the Git now and you can get access freely if you contribute enough. Getting 120+ ghosts users was annoying to maintain. No more diff patch share aswell for me. It is a success so far. I should have raised the price way before - people only bows in front of money and indeed, they don't respect free or (almost free) shared content. Not sure if you ever read L2JBrazil content regarding myself - they say I force renames to sell more revisions (which was 1€/revision, one revision being like 15 days minimum of work). Funny community.

L2Reborn used aCis in the beginning (Jan to March 2020) but switched to Lucera. The administrator (which is named p0w3rf1y on my forums, his name is on few changesets) helped for a good time, then simply cut the access to his project without telling me a word. Lucera is a fork of the main L2 RU fork than any RU fork is using (Overlord, L2Scripts, etc). They only downgraded the chronicle. None of the core work is actually done by them, they simply inherit from main RU fork (DefaultAI, geoengine, etc).

I can't wait to see your solo coded L2J IL fork, based on L2J IL latest branch (not based on any dissapointing forks), reviewed by none except yourself, coded in less than 10y. If you provide me evidences you can do equal result (datapack, formula, AI, scripts,...), without any copy-paste from another sources, I'm willing to deliver you my Paypal account.

Themed events (Halloween, Christmas,...) can actually be automatized (using a ScheduledScript on aCis, no clue about other forks). TvT and alike events should be, imo, manually triggered by the server team (ingame reward, ingame announcements... generally generate some warm moments).

It's probably only few lines to add.

aCis' DNA is to provide a free-custom / vanilla experience - people adds their customs to make THEIR servers. So your remarks are perfectly understable, but that's actually accurate compared to my own vision - one vanilla experience, and a ecosystem of people trading/sharing their customs between them. We got far lesser configurations than L2J server itself, by default. Admincommands were refactored to be cut by half (100 admincommands overall). Saying the pack is "basic", well, can be misread - the pack is far to be basic - all main methods were refactored/enhanced, and methods/systems which I judged needed were added (PlayerMemo, for exemple). If you mean it doesn't offer a lot of configurations, well... This is the intention since day 1.

I can confirm that backdoor exists since few months on this pack, since someone shared a server using that source with me around February (I just verified it today to see if it was existing). Potentially all servers using that pack are endangered. I can't confirm if Devlin is the actual author, or if the sources were corrupted by someone else and distributed like that. Except if the topic owner manipulated the database, Devlin seems guilty. @Sh4xMx should provide links about actual payment to Devlin, to certify he used Devlin pack and not a shady share. If the payment is verified, then it means than the source is, by default, corrupted with a backdoor and Devlin is guilty. Backdoors got nothing to do in sources. You simply make you untrusted using that. If you don't believe in your customers, then restrain the sell or don't sell at all. Also such code is extremely easy to spot on. In any case, if you don't want that sort of surprise, you should use the original material ;).

If you use 382 yes, but KejbL uses 399 and TargetHandler were reworked.

<set name="target" val="TARGET_SELF" /> > <set name="target" val="SELF" /> Other than that, no reason it doesn't work. There is probably a core edit to do for the raise of the skill itself, I don't see how it would process different level than 1.

If your point is than a pack is achieved because it got all scripts, I can simply spawn a Frintezza, call it Frintezza.java and you would be happy with that, I suppose. That's not my way of working - never was and never will be. L2JFrozen actually thought like you - hotfixing stuff rather than making clean version of it. We got a clear different point of view about this, so... Do your stuff, I continue to do mine - which will be far superior in the end (until you decide to copy-paste it, fixing one thing and claiming your version is better than mine). To do what you do, you need people like me, to begin with. We can't all be damn bloodysuckers, hotfixing stuff and waiting for someone more competent/skilled to fix it for you.

Movement got nothing to do with L2OFF, globally speaking, and that particular issue is simply due to FloodProtector StopMove. I just tested on AdvExt that behavior, and it's worst than aCis once related FP is set to 0. https://streamable.com/0sm3u3 -> AdvExt PTS Maybe got an actual clue of what is L2OFF, before saying it's far from L2OFF.

I don't think I got some lessons to pick from someone who ninja other ppl work. Ofc you got things since 2014, you can thank some people for that :). From what I know, my scripts and my geodata was also used for a good time - and that time you didn't spend, I spent it for you, basically. I could fork L2JMobius and get "spawn zones since 2014" aswell. Pick your Frintezza, for exemple. Put some fixes upon it, and tell your version was shitty and mine is better. That's basically what you achieved, so far. I'm not that sort of people, but good for you if you are, and if people follow.

If you can't understand what is SpawnManager and what it actually offers as possibilities, be sure then adding any random Frintezza found on the internet will fit your needs.

I know my profits are neglictable, and that's why I'm restrictive about aCis usages / terms of agreement. That project was never meant to make money, so the minimum is to respect my rules. People don't understand multiple thousands of hours were spent - almost freely. That's also why I raised prices, since people only respect money and not the hard work. @Kara you can test PTS and figure out by yourself.

If we speak about Interlude, my pack is still actively updated - we introduced few weeks ago new SpawnManager, few days ago we released complete drop/spoil rates edit based on L2OFF rates and manor domains (seeds territory zones). Hasha actually focus about implementing properly the AI system (would take few months), I personnally introduce numerous new event types (PARTY_KILLED, PARTY_ATTACKED, SEE_ITEM, NO_DESIRE, etc), and eventually the Desire system (under thoughts). aCis got its own PTS named Blackbird since few weeks to test latest revision, anyone can logon and test it. There are tutorials on aCis forums about installation, and people shared a lot of customs adapted to aCis. For all infos, join the Discord / forums and read the content. 542 people donated between july 2012 and june 2021, 16 ppl donated since new system introduction. If you speak about other chronicles, well, you got L2J for H5.

It's already fixed on rev 401. As stated in the changeset, it's linked to follow state behavior.

If you provide and restrict some areas, notably Marketplace, to "not that much" randomers, then there is no benefits to generate a new forum account. Marketplace should be accessible to ppl with positive contribution, to begin with.

I would prefer to get the ban history of a people, on a visible scale (directly under his name) and no matter if he is unbanned one day. It should stay visible. That would give some hints about that people "general" behavior.

That's the main point of a wiki, but not a forum. If anyone can edit anything, without any type of history or rollback, be sure some clowns will abuse of their powers. I agree moderators close topics way too fast, and either should select themselves the best answer, or let the topic author to pin the good solution. About the pin solution, you can reward the topic author himself to use that feature (with a badge, point reputation, etc). The "good solution" provider would earn even more contribution points. Those contribution points can then be "traded" for services, goods, ads. Maybe @Maxtor crypto would have a use ? ;)

It is basically done introducing an "int" into WorldObject class, storing the actual instance. Then in the knownlist system (setRegion + getKnownType methods), you filter objects based on distance (as always), and by that int. There are plenty of shared systems on MxC, for different projects (mine included).

Public repository is actually rev 382, so @ExTrEmEDwarfis right. L2JBrazil = clowns.