Jump to content

Question

Posted

Hello.im ultra noob and im experimenting with an l2 interlude server(l2 acis-public-master)My first questin is how possible is for some1 to upgrade on acis project an interlude server to a fg.Im on really early stage of that try and the progress is really slow with a lot of error.

 

The 2nd question is something else.im trying to import some of @CriticalError shares(btw thanks mates,cool shares) but when i add the sql part on the folder where all the other sql are i cant see it on navicat.I tried to import it manually but i get an error ([ERR] 1146 - Table '12.custom_weapon' doesn't exist)-->(12 is my db).I can understand that there is no table that stores the weapon stats.So where are those stats stored?

 

P.S i know i will never go live probably but its really a way to express my creativity.Thanks in advance.

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted
4 hours ago, Tryskell said:

All static (any template type : npc, item, zone, skill...) data is stored into XML, db is for dynamic data.

I didn't get your first question.

Thank you for your reply.i did that,creating a new .xml and adding the data of the weapon but when i try to create it in game,a message that dont exist comes.(the custom weapon i dled have an .sql table as well)

 

I use your pack btw(thank you for your share)

 

My 1st question is:How possible is to 'upgrade' an interlude client to an fg on l2acis.I did my reserach and i was not able to find a fg acis pack.

To clarify it more.Is it possible to be an interlude 'engine' but looking like fg? 

  • 0
Posted
I got no clue what is "fg". You can use upper client (Classic, H5 or whatever), but you have to adapt all packets to match the client requirements (which is the edition of existing packets - opcodes and structures - and the addition of new packets - to support whatever client window).

aCis is dedicated to IL (aCis stands for "another Crappy interlude server"), there is an eventual project to make it running using an upper client, but that's definitively not my priority right now and if I do it, that would be either extremely costy or for myself.

About your custom table (and customs in general) it's not because you add a random config/table it gonna magically work. For your custom table to work, you have to add the whole server side to load your table on server, since there is no custom items table by default on aCis.

The easiest way is to copy-paste an existing object from XML and add it on existing XMLs. There is strictly no uses to make a custom items SQL table.
  • 0
Posted
6 hours ago, xZEUSx said:

Never heard of "fg" ... maybe he means Gracia Final(gf)?

Why would you update from Intelude to Gracia Final? If you make all this effort to make the server work for a newer client, take the latest client that you have interface source + compiler for.

  • 0
Posted
15 hours ago, An4rchy said:

Why would you update from Intelude to Gracia Final? If you make all this effort to make the server work for a newer client, take the latest client that you have interface source + compiler for.

Bro, I am just trying to offer a suggestion about wtf @madbill means when he says "fg"

  • 0
Posted
On 5/18/2023 at 11:48 PM, Tryskell said:

I got no clue what is "fg". You can use upper client (Classic, H5 or whatever), but you have to adapt all packets to match the client requirements (which is the edition of existing packets - opcodes and structures - and the addition of new packets - to support whatever client window).

aCis is dedicated to IL (aCis stands for "another Crappy interlude server"), there is an eventual project to make it running using an upper client, but that's definitively not my priority right now and if I do it, that would be either extremely costy or for myself.

About your custom table (and customs in general) it's not because you add a random config/table it gonna magically work. For your custom table to work, you have to add the whole server side to load your table on server, since there is no custom items table by default on aCis.

The easiest way is to copy-paste an existing object from XML and add it on existing XMLs. There is strictly no uses to make a custom items SQL table.

Thank you for your reply.I am sorry about the confusion with the acronym 'fg',my dyslexia some times strikes back hard.I was reffering to Gracia final.

 

I had no idea that aCis was deticated to IL.I was clueless.I chose this Sef because i was under the impression tha it's the most stable.

I hope for goold luck with your projects and im really greatfull for your advices.Knowledge come with a price these days.Im still gonna try with the upgrade even without much awarness of coding.

 

I see what you are saying about XMLs,i will do that.

On 5/20/2023 at 2:55 AM, xZEUSx said:

Bro, I am just trying to offer a suggestion about wtf @madbill means when he says "fg"

You are right.i was reffering to Gracia Final as 'fg'.As i mentionted before i had no idea that aCis stand for another custom interlude server(im using this sef atm).This whole missunderstanding prompted by my tiny understanding of l2 emu+coding.

 

@An4rchyi swept the web but i was unable to find the right data i need to do what you're talking about.

 

  • 0
Posted
Well, my answer is still reliable. You can reach another chronicle altering packets structures and opcodes + adding missing functionalities which were introduced in later chronicles. Datapack would still be IL oriented, so you also have to reparse it (using L2OFF, and you're lucky since GF is the only viable datapack and you won't have to bother about data being true or false).

It's an extreme time-consuming action, and you shouldn't handle it alone, except if you already mastered L2J. But well, do whatever you want with your free time ;).

Being GF, H5 or Classic chronicle doesn't really matter. Some even tried to port aCis as Hellbound, from what I know.
  • 0
Posted
16 hours ago, Tryskell said:

Well, my answer is still reliable. You can reach another chronicle altering packets structures and opcodes + adding missing functionalities which were introduced in later chronicles. Datapack would still be IL oriented, so you also have to reparse it (using L2OFF, and you're lucky since GF is the only viable datapack and you won't have to bother about data being true or false).

It's an extreme time-consuming action, and you shouldn't handle it alone, except if you already mastered L2J. But well, do whatever you want with your free time ;).

Being GF, H5 or Classic chronicle doesn't really matter. Some even tried to port aCis as Hellbound, from what I know.

Well to me its a marathon,not a 100m sprint.I will continue to have fun while editing and failing again and again and who knows,maybe in the future i will be able to show what i did to the world.

The real surprise for me was that every1 who contact me was really helpfull and very polite.

Gl to everyone and thank you.You really clarify my cloudy view.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • Luniage - a custom Interlude client on Unity, with its own server Hi everyone. I've been quietly working on this for a long time and I think it's finally at the point where it's worth showing. Short version: it's Interlude, but the client and the server are both mine. The client is a custom one, built in Unity — not a patched or reskinned original. The server is written from scratch in C#. The only thing that comes from the old game is the content: the world, the models, the animations, the sounds, the icons, the interface art. The game looks and feels like the game you know. Everything underneath it is new. Why do this at all   Because the old client is a 2004 executable and anyone who has ever tried to add something to it knows exactly how that conversation ends. You can't add a window. You can't change how a skill looks. You can't fix a bug that's staring you in the face. Every server that wanted a feature of its own had to fake it through HTML dialogs and system messages, because the client simply won't bend. At some point it stops being worth fighting. I'd rather keep the game and rebuild everything around it. Where it is right now   You can sit down and play it. Not a tech demo, not a walk-around-and-look-at-the-trees build - an actual character. Most of the game is in: movement, combat, the skill system with its real formulas and timings, items and equipment, enchanting, shops and player trade, quests, parties, clans, and the whole interface that ties it together. Progression works from level 1 all the way through A grade - you can level, gear up, join a clan and run content today. What's missing isn't the foundation. It's the top end - and that's exactly where the work is pointed next.   Videos     What I'm working on now   Castle sieges and the Olympiad. The two biggest systems the game has, the ones that turn a working world into a server people actually stay on. And visual effects. They already run, but "runs" and "looks the way you remember it" are two very different things, and closing that gap turned out to be a much longer road than I expected. I'm going through them one by one. Does it run outside Windows   Yes. It's a Unity project, so Windows, Mac and Linux are just build targets. I actually develop on a Mac, which has kept the whole thing honest about staying portable. Will it work with my existing server   No, and it never will. The client talks to my server and nothing else - that's the trade I made, and it's the reason everything above is possible in the first place. If you're looking for a drop-in replacement client for a setup you already have, this isn't it. What's the goal   First and foremost, to launch my own project on it. That's what the client and the server are being built for, and that's what sets the priorities. Longer term, I'd like to open-source it. This community has spent twenty years working around a client nobody can touch, and I think the honest ending to this story is handing over something people can actually build on. I'm not putting a date on that - first it has to be good enough to be worth someone else's time. Can I try it   Not yet. When there's a build worth handing out, it gets posted here first. In the meantime I'll be posting progress regularly, and I read every reply. If you've run a server, built a client, or just spent a decade staring at this game and know exactly which detail everyone gets wrong — please say so. A good share of what's right in this project is right because somebody pointed at a screenshot and said "that's not how it looked." Thanks for reading.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..