Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can we get old times back? What do you think?

 

A little timeback memories:

 

Spam Team last post:

http://prnt.sc/dsgfg2

 

Legendary Members last post:

http://prntscr.com/dsggp7

 

Old Staffers:

http://prntscr.com/dsgigw

 

 

Posted

Can we get old times back? What do you think?

 

A little timeback memories:

 

Spam Team last post:

http://prnt.sc/dsgfg2

 

Legendary Members last post:

http://prntscr.com/dsggp7

 

Old Staffers:

http://prntscr.com/dsgigw

If u unban half forum that is banned.

Posted (edited)

Dask? please dont remind me that guy.

I'm worst than him, i wait until maxtor give me moderator rights and once he give me i'll surprize him and ban him.

Edited by AccessDenied
Posted (edited)

I'm worst than him, i wait until maxtor give me moderator rights and once he give me i'll surprize him and ban him.

 

I know him very well and he knows me too we were like the cat and the dog (that sounds gey) but nevermind he might surprise you too  :-beep- yeah:

 

Also Raule was the best guy back then.

Edited by Sawadee
Posted

EVERYTHING WRONG WITH MAXTOR IN LESS THAN 2 MINUTES

CURRENT SINS: 0

 

1. Owner of the forum gave trusted medal reward on his own self. (+1)

2. Using a hard-disk label name, cause hardware's company name is the exact opposite of too mainstream in 2k16 (+3)

3. Having master-chief as your background show 3 things, 1 you drink lots of beer, 2 you're spending much time with your friends in your living room playing play station 2 while drinking too much beer and 3

you're eating premade frozen pizza while spending much time with your friends in your living room playing play station 2 and drinking too much beer. (+4)

4. Maxtor own +1 positive feedback from iAndre because he bough a service. Now last time i woke up i remember that this system were working in the opposite way. I wanted to know who besiege us while i was sleeping. (+10)

5. Admin miss old times cliche. (+2)

6. Asking for old times back when half + forum is banned. The whole idea is higher contrast than Henri Matisse's paintings. It open too many roads. Why maxtor want old memories back? He want ban more people? Why adam had navel on the painting? Why i'm writing down those stuff anyway? (+2)

7. Maxtor opened topics in Romanian just because the guy who "designed" the theme of the forum is from Romania. (+1) 

8. Access this awesome guy profil? I did and i proudly say it wasn't awesome at all. Well i don't know about you but i had more awesome time when Justin Biebier threw up on the scene while he was singing.  (+3)

9. MaxCheaters reborn cliche. (+2)

10. This creepy smile after Coming soon in the quote kinda remind your ex's face few seconds after she asked "Why is Christina in our shower?" and you answer "Baby this not how it looks". (+2)

11. Christmas is over, new year's eve is over, still keeps the Christmas Logo on the site. (+1)

12. "Yours since 2005", mine? You never were mine. Last time i got chat banned more times than Snoop Dog attempts to no smoke weed before make a video. Don't tell me you're mine then cause the bakery i entered yesterday to buy a 0.50 euro bread made me feel more safety. (+10)

13. Also, "Yours" cliche. (+1)

14. Maxtor added only "Sales" option in Support Section. Cause he literally tell you "screw you" i'm bored you ain't contact me, it was just a showcase for my button. (+1)

 

A TOTAL OF 43 SINS

PHRASE: There's a purple mushroom in my backyard, screaming Taco's!

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..