Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Strix-Guard is a universal client-server protection for Lineage II client, that protecting from a 3rd-party software.

Usability:
Protection designed for prevention of using any known bots, clickers, scripts and another 3rd-party software without a performance loss for client and server.

LineageII Clients list:

  • Interlude
  • Gracia Final
  • Gracia Plus(Epilogue)
  • Freya
  • High Five
  • Goddess of Destruction: Awakening, Harmony, Tauti, Glory Days, Lindvior, Epeisodion / Valiance
  • Epic Tales of Aden: Dimensional Strangers - Ertheia, Infinite Odyssey, Helios

Protection potential:
Protection has a lot of potential and has main and additional modules.

Main modules:

  • Bot protection
  • Packet change protection
  • Clicker protection
  • HWID Module
  • Traffic Encrypt

Additional Modules:

  • Your own text in client or any additional informaion
  • Checksums check on client load (protection from interface modifiers)
  • Auth server connection verification.

At this moment it protects from last adrenaline bot and all another 3rdparty soft.

 

 

Strix-Guard Main Site

Multilang coming soon

 

test server patch: click [HIGH FIVE PATCH]

contact skype: prikol912
 

Edited by Enmity
Posted

A competition is a very good thing in any development. We hope that you provide quality service to your clients and our competition will resolve developing the protection modules far and beyond.

 

Good luck with sales =)

  • 3 years later...
  • 9 months later...
Posted
4 hours ago, Celestine said:

 

yes not bad protection. 

This protection is trash,not bad? Cmon owner of this ‘try’ is a clown the support is terrible,it’s a waste of money,use smartguard if u want a cheap one if u want the best one use ac. If u wanna buy strix guard better donate the money to Unicef.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, InTheEndॐ said:

If u wanna buy strix guard better donate the money to Unicef.

 

200 IQ reply

Edited by xdem
Posted
12 hours ago, InTheEndॐ said:

This protection is trash,not bad? Cmon owner of this ‘try’ is a clown the support is terrible,it’s a waste of money,use smartguard if u want a cheap one if u want the best one use ac. If u wanna buy strix guard better donate the money to Unicef.

smartguard is more crap than this one then who ever uses smartguard simply loses his money at least strixguard is 1 time payment and u have it for ever their support may bad because they do not understand english i'd suggest AAC too but it's way to expensive but yeah 

Posted
1 hour ago, Celestine said:

smartguard is more crap than this one then who ever uses smartguard simply loses his money at least strixguard is 1 time payment and u have it for ever their support may bad because they do not understand english i'd suggest AAC too but it's way to expensive but yeah 

There are 2 type of antibot. AC & the rest. So I can say 100% everything else is equal, everything has its price so if you don’t want to pay a lot of money get a standard version of the antibot that are released.

Posted
Just now, InTheEndॐ said:

There are 2 type of antibot. AC & the rest. So I can say 100% everything else is equal, everything has its price so if you don’t want to pay a lot of money get a standard version of the antibot that are released.

 

There is only 1 type of antibot, that one that can be bypassed by adrenaline easily.

  • Haha 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..