Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

you are proficient in C# and for that you create this project ... nice !!!

but this project core is like java and nothing like C# ... wtf ?

i can't understand what are you saying

 

good luck again for your project ( is like java and you create it why you is proficient in C# and nothing is in core is like C# )

omg .....

 

good luck again

 

"So, which language is superior? You have Java, which will run on many different operating systems without recompiling code. You have C#, which seems to have many more built-in language features, and will run on any operating system that has an installed CLR. Naturally, if you have limited development time and need an application that can run on almost any operating system, then Java seems to be the obvious current choice. But if you know that your application will run on Windows, and you have or don't have limited development time, using a good type-safe, powerful language like C# seems to a very excellent decision. Anywhere in-between, which most software falls, will require a more difficult analysis.

 

 

I have used both languages professionally, so I know about some of the strengths and weaknesses of both. If it were my choice, and I were to create a new application that I knew would run on a Windows operating system, then I would choose C# over Java. From my experience, I know that even Java applications don't always behave the same way on different operating systems, particularly when building user interfaces. But I'm not trying to "dis" Java; it's a minor miracle that it works at all on so many platforms. Rather, I would choose C# over any language that I've used before, including C++, Smalltalk, Pascal, Lisp, and again, Java—you name it. C# is a very good pure object-oriented programming language, with lots of features. It is quite evident that the architects of C# spent a lot of quality time and quantity effort to build such a potentially quintessential language. It does have a few debatably minor snags, some of them described above, but the strengths far outweigh any of its minor weaknesses. But what I think doesn't really matter. What does matter is what language you will use to create your next application. That is up to you.

 

 

If you have read this document to this point, I thank you. It is lengthier than I originally planned, but it could in reality be much longer—there is so much left to cover. But the ironic conclusion that I must come to is this: it doesn't matter which language is better, and maybe more important, which language to use. Why, you may ask, after all your devoted reading? Because C# doesn't even care. If you read the section above about language interoperability, you realize that C# doesn't even know what languages were used in the libraries that it imports and uses. To C#, compiled J# looks just like compiled C# looks just like compiled managed C++ looks just like compiled whatever-new-language-is-supported. If C# doesn't care, why should you? And in reality, the "C# versus Java" debate is just an either-or fallacy anyway; there are of course many language choices at your disposal. Use whatever you want. Personally, I will continue to use C# because I think that it is a solid language. But the introduction of Visual Studio .NET should make comparisons moot, because more and more languages should be supported by this development tool and platform in the near future, allowing you to use whatever language you choose. And at that point, any choice you make shouldn't be a bad one.

 

 

Maybe we don't have to dream about that "fantasy world" any longer."

 

 

Full article's Source: C# and Java: Comparing Programming Languages

Edited by DEV|Supreme
Posted

...

 

- October 2003 article.

- Article found on microsoft website.

 

Do you think a microsoft article would blame their own langage ?

Do you think quoting a 13y old article is interesting (Java 5 came in 2004, Lineage 2 wasn't even launched on NA).

Posted

- October 2003 article.

- Article found on microsoft website.

 

Do you think a microsoft article would blame their own langage ?

Do you think quoting a 13y old article is interesting (Java 5 came in 2004, Lineage 2 wasn't even launched on NA).

C# and visual studio was pretty shit back then too.

 

The main point tho is that C# in a windows environment with outperform Java (even running on linux) by a mile. That's a benchmarked fact. 

And that's mainly because java doesn't have one environment, it has all of them while C# was made to run perfectly on one environment.

Now with .NET Core you can run C# everywhere without needing .net framework installed and still have the awesome performance.

 

So...yeah..

Posted (edited)

"So, which language is superior? You have Java, which will run on many different operating systems without recompiling code. You have C#, which seems to have many more built-in language features, and will run on any operating system that has an installed CLR. Naturally, if you have limited development time and need an application that can run on almost any operating system, then Java seems to be the obvious current choice. But if you know that your application will run on Windows, and you have or don't have limited development time, using a good type-safe, powerful language like C# seems to a very excellent decision. Anywhere in-between, which most software falls, will require a more difficult analysis.

 

 

I have used both languages professionally, so I know about some of the strengths and weaknesses of both. If it were my choice, and I were to create a new application that I knew would run on a Windows operating system, then I would choose C# over Java. From my experience, I know that even Java applications don't always behave the same way on different operating systems, particularly when building user interfaces. But I'm not trying to "dis" Java; it's a minor miracle that it works at all on so many platforms. Rather, I would choose C# over any language that I've used before, including C++, Smalltalk, Pascal, Lisp, and again, Java—you name it. C# is a very good pure object-oriented programming language, with lots of features. It is quite evident that the architects of C# spent a lot of quality time and quantity effort to build such a potentially quintessential language. It does have a few debatably minor snags, some of them described above, but the strengths far outweigh any of its minor weaknesses. But what I think doesn't really matter. What does matter is what language you will use to create your next application. That is up to you.

 

 

If you have read this document to this point, I thank you. It is lengthier than I originally planned, but it could in reality be much longer—there is so much left to cover. But the ironic conclusion that I must come to is this: it doesn't matter which language is better, and maybe more important, which language to use. Why, you may ask, after all your devoted reading? Because C# doesn't even care. If you read the section above about language interoperability, you realize that C# doesn't even know what languages were used in the libraries that it imports and uses. To C#, compiled J# looks just like compiled C# looks just like compiled managed C++ looks just like compiled whatever-new-language-is-supported. If C# doesn't care, why should you? And in reality, the "C# versus Java" debate is just an either-or fallacy anyway; there are of course many language choices at your disposal. Use whatever you want. Personally, I will continue to use C# because I think that it is a solid language. But the introduction of Visual Studio .NET should make comparisons moot, because more and more languages should be supported by this development tool and platform in the near future, allowing you to use whatever language you choose. And at that point, any choice you make shouldn't be a bad one.

 

 

Maybe we don't have to dream about that "fantasy world" any longer."

 

 

Full article's Source: C# and Java: Comparing Programming Languages

I read all your text ( you read all my post ? )

i don't said nothing for how languages is better

i said only this session is for l2j and this project is not l2j and need new session ( I can not explain it more ) me english is verry bad for explain it  more

if you read my first and second post can you see that, and don't get random post for spam... read all post plz next time

Edited by pirama
Posted

i said only this session is for l2j and this project is not l2j and need new session ( I can not explain it more ) me english is verry bad for explain it  more

 

1. There is no specific section for such project, as L2OFF uses one langage and L2J uses another. This project uses a third langage.

2. This is the best section for such exotic thread, as it shares all aspects with L2J (emulator, langage similarities). The point it hasn't be moved by another moderator into a more appropriate section should be enough for you.

Posted (edited)

Firstly i was talking about C# running on windows. But thanks for that cuz you help me prove my point.

 

Everything up to fasta is what you should really care about.

And what you are seeing there is the 1.0.0-preview2-003121 of .NET Core (Which launched last month) compared to latest JRE version running on DEBIAN.

 

Let's say that again all together. The FIRST ever release version of .NET Core with the LATEST version JRE.

Yeah to me that's a huge win.

Edited by .Elfocrash
Posted
 

1. There is no specific section for such project, as L2OFF uses one langage and L2J uses another. This project uses a third langage.

2. This is the best section for such exotic thread, as it shares all aspects with L2J (emulator, langage similarities). The point it hasn't be moved by another moderator into a more appropriate section should be enough for you.

is not for me lol

is for forum this project is not l2j ( give on forum better image ).

this project yes is similar but not work like l2j... not use same program's for compile , edit , add , code's . all is differently 

i think this project need new session that is me opinion ( share for this project , fix ,everything is differently )

if you and everyone believe C# and Java is same and this project must stay here

simply if is similar adapt all code's of this session on C#

 

you see ? is not same :) and need another session for talking for this ( is not l2j )

Posted

I read all your text ( you read all my post ? )

i don't said nothing for how languages is better

i said only this session is for l2j and this project is not l2j and need new session ( I can not explain it more ) me english is verry bad for explain it  more

if you read my first and second post can you see that, and don't get random post for spam... read all post plz next time

 

Oh I read all this posts topic alright.

 

Only answered you how to google some of the noticeable on fly Informations about your first question "difference between java and c# developments", there's tons of info about their differences including the one's sdw mentioned

 

Haven't mentioned his as you looked you didnt understood the regular basis so it would be better showing you something in theory...

Posted (edited)

Oh I read all this posts topic alright.

 

Only answered you how to google some of the noticeable on fly Informations about your first question "difference between java and c# developments", there's tons of info about their differences including the one's sdw mentioned

 

Haven't mentioned his as you looked you didnt understood the regular basis so it would be better showing you something in theory...

i know is not same and that i said this project is not l2j and need another session ( my post 2o )

and elfo told me this session is good for this project . but if this project is not l2j and l2j and C# is not same 

this project need another session  ( like l2off ) why l2j and l2off have difference session ?

wtf on all forum only me i see this difference ?

can you tell me your opinion for this ?

is same java and C# ?

this project stay good on l2j session ?

Edited by pirama
Posted

 

 

is not for me lol

is for forum this project is not l2j ( give on forum better image ).

this project yes is similar but not work like l2j... not use same program's for compile , edit , add , code's . all is differently 

i think this project need new session that is me opinion ( share for this project , fix ,everything is differently )

if you and everyone believe C# and Java is same and this project must stay here

simply if is similar adapt all code's of this session on C#

 

you see ? is not same :) and need another session for talking for this ( is not l2j )

 

 

You just did 2 pages of nonsense simply to tell than, according to you, that topic got no place here. Cut the crap out.

Posted (edited)

Testing our live test server with Szaka :D

 

rAnHOBz.png

 

Oh I'm famous!

 

i dont said that ...  C# and C++ have more commons than java and C#

At first glance I didn't see difference between C# and java. C++ is totally different world! Especially C++11, seems like completely new language <3

Edited by Szakalaka

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • Hi, I'm selling Interface sources. I was working with one of bigger Essence projects (for ±1 year) delivering them Interface source KR. Per this period gathered knowledge about UE, UE Scripting, saw a lot of tools and their progression. So finally I decided that I can open up my own sales topic. I'm selling source for any protocol - If I don't have source, I will need you to provide whole system folder or for Essence/main - provide me protocol number. Sources are acquired by my OWN decompiler - written in Java, so we're not using popular UEExplorer upgraded by anyone. Decompiler extracts already compile ready sources. It outputs clean code, however constants are mapped 60-70%. Why only 60-70%? Well tl;dr when you compile any sources, they take at that time constant value and place it instead of = CONST_NAME to = THAT_CONST_NAME_VALUE, so it's not possible to have const name instead of value. Example of output: https://pastebin.com/cjyXcJvT for bigger .uc class (557p). p.s pastebin messed up encoding, but KR symbols are preserved - you won't see "?" symbols, rather you will see proper original korean text. I will give you guide as well, how not to mess it up with your editor VS Code/Notepad++ or what you use it to make them preserve it. You will get source + my compiler wrapper (written in java) - works on Windows/Mac/Linux - it has small GUI but supports CLI. Small notice, who thinks 'this is decompiled source' - basically all sources that are on sale are made by decompiling .u and applying changes. I think powerhouse few years ago was ArtToKill/kick (kick added support for INT64 to the publicly available compiler sources) etc. So no - there are no straight from 'creator' sources anywhere, all sellers offer the same - just the quality is different. UEExplorer upgraded was a big step, however, it introduces still a lot of nesting, if statements wrapping incorrectly which could lead to bugs. There are many things how to identify poor quality sources, as if the seller tries to sell 'out-of-box' when they see it compiles - sad news, some bugs are in the logic due to seller focusing only on 'it compiles' rather than issues that their decompiler is not capable so solve. On request I can restore ±100% const mapping.   Later I can attach compiled .u to try. Price is 400EUR. Payment methods USDT (Crypto). I'm still in debate with myself, wether to start selling XDat Editor with structures and ClientDat with 100% all files openings (no unk namings) and improved experience (such as comments support in .dat files, mass sync, improved performance and so on). P.s. If you ask me to give you some project's custom interface - the price may vary - there are couple things per project that need to be hand checked and adjusted (for example Innadril completely changes tokens which then I need to adjust my program to their token Ids). So it might take more time = more money. P.s.s. I have more things in the garage, like my own dsetup source that can allow you 'unlocking' system with your desired encrypting - you don't need to wait till 'patched' systems start appearing and so on, but I think at this time everyone who needs it make them selves it. AAC crypt removals and so on, BuildZone, everything that 'unlocks' client, however, I don't plan to make them on sale as mentioned, everyone can do them.  
    • It has been a while since I updated this thread. I am currently actively working on a full-scale port of the shader library to ensure the fast and accurate transfer of all effects. I have decompiled the original game and created a tool that fully logs the entire *Lineage 2 Interlude* particle system. This allows me to extract the original formulas hardcoded into the game, resulting in a high-fidelity port. For instance, *Lineage 2* uses an `appRnd` system that generates unique randomization patterns for different skills, giving them distinct visual characteristics; there are countless formulas and technical nuances like this. Ultimately, I will derive all the key formulas and replicate the geometry with high precision. Twelve basic geometry formulas have already been ported. The effect was created in 10 minutes using a .uc file, HLSL formulas, and SpriteEmitter particle blending formulas.   https://prnt.sc/_3UDLQVX_Y-_
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..