Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think that tryskell's project(aCis) is better nowadays because his team always updating new contents of their project(thing that i didn't saw nowadays from other projects...) Also They're skilled and they know how to control a project with its source and other usefull modifications... So I prefer aCis Project

Posted

I think that tryskell's project(aCis) is better nowadays because his team always updating new contents of their project(thing that i didn't saw nowadays from other projects...) Also They're skilled and they know how to control a project with its source and other usefull modifications... So I prefer aCis Project

Atm i'm using aCis and i think i 'll continue using it but i want an overview about the other projects too ..

Posted

Atm i'm using aCis and i think i 'll continue using it but i want an overview about the other projects too ..

 

Believe me bud, if i would like to make a server i would pay for aCis Source ofcourse...

Posted

If it was so worthy, you would manage to use it rather than 2011 L2JArchid as base for your own pack.

 

So, probably not so worthy.

 

Any clue about RU developement regarding IL ? They're kinda sneaky.

you are still forgeting that i started developing my project at 2011 and not last year ;) i didn't have that pack in my possession that year

Posted

Sadly, I missed that topic but anyway.

 

The usage of open source projects is wayyy more recommened to create a server. That happends because at open source everyone is able to contribute bug report and test. In the other hand, private projects are usually created by one or two developers, and that's it.

 

All l2j projects are full of bugs, missing a ton of retail stuff, all these are not a one-man job.

 

Futhermore, you can ask freely for help at (open source)s and actually reciece some answer, but in private projects, at most of the times, the so called developers are busy and by the time they already have money in their pockets.

 

If you ask me, DONT even think to buy a project. Except the fact that you will propably get scammed, the possibilites will be wayy less that the possibilities that an open source project can offer you.

Posted

Sadly, I missed that topic but anyway.

 

The usage of open source projects is wayyy more recommened to create a server. That happends because at open source everyone is able to contribute bug report and test. In the other hand, private projects are usually created by one or two developers, and that's it.

 

All l2j projects are full of bugs, missing a ton of retail stuff, all these are not a one-man job.

 

Futhermore, you can ask freely for help at (open source)s and actually reciece some answer, but in private projects, at most of the times, the so called developers are busy and by the time they already have money in their pockets.

 

If you ask me, DONT even think to buy a project. Except the fact that you will propably get scammed, the possibilites will be wayy less that the possibilities that an open source project can offer you.

thanks.

Posted

The only pack which i would ever buy would be official. official files rock.

 

and who is gonna fix it's bugs? you or ur gonna hire an NCsoft developer ?

Posted

The only pack which i would ever buy would be official. official files rock.

 

Hahaha, nice one :D

 

As xdem said..

Posted

If he would be able to purchase such files, he would be also able to hire people being able to handle them properly. Though stupid example.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...