Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

2rpblsn.jpg

 

Implementation of XML LoS walls.

https://www.assembla.com/spaces/l2jmobius/subversion/commits/1251

 

I made these to help with the lack of geodata on some areas.

Don't know how they would work on a big scale, but as a small scale utility its nice to have.

 

-Geodata can be totaly disabled, they are not needed in order to work, that was the basic idea. :P

-Included data\walls\giran_arena.xml as example.

 

Additional stuff to make management easier:

-Config in General.ini to disable them.
-Updated reload command (//reload wall) to reload changes on live servers.

-New command //showwalls to view them in game.

Edited by Mobius
Posted (edited)

At least he do things and share for free (good or not), the only clowns in here are u and ur l2jpitty

You have no idea what he just did.

 

Anyway we share stuffs for free too. Just for right peoples. And if you talking about public share, our team members did for official l2j more than everyone else. and Mobius is based on our team member's work.

Edited by St3eT
Posted

Well, to get back on St3eT first statement, why not simply fix geodata if there are any flaws (or even geoengine, if inaccurate on such specific walls) ? I don't really get "it" (the idea of a 'secondary' geoengine/geodata) aswell. Even if it's optional.

 

It's similar to fix a hole in a auto tire with some balls of paper.

 

Just my 50 cents.

Posted

Well he simply found a way to fix his lack of geodata cause they don't have any, nor they have someone with knowledge to work on the matter.

 

He is trying that's a thing, but ...

Posted

Well he simply found a way to fix his lack of geodata cause they don't have any, nor they have someone with knowledge to work on the matter.

 

He is trying that's a thing, but ...

Thank you Sdw the point is that one we try fix the things the way we can or we know , not surprise me come some ppl here thing they are the owner of the knowledge but in the end I JUST I KNOW THEY NAMES no more else. (even some of them with a litle share on l2j than is a death project so good started but sad END!)

Posted

You could simply take few mins/hours and see there are some already existing tools to edit geodata, such as G3DEditor.

 

http://www.l2jserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=94&t=21432

 

It's not a matter of being a "owner of knowledge" (Did I say that ? Did I treat you of "ignorant pleb" ? Did I say I was the "master of all L2J projects", the "one to rule them all" ?), but just pure and plain logic.

 

Before doing a work, you ask to yourself if it worths to do it, or if there isn't a better way to handle it. That's the b.a-ba question. And that's the question I'm currently asking when I see time has been used ("wasted" in this case, imho).

 

2 systems affecting the same thing it's like... Getting 2 NpcTable, affecting each other. Kinda nonsense.

Posted
It really looks that some people are bothered by the fact that anyone can make XML data.

 

I had my fan-times with generating geodata in the past, but buildzone seems broken on latest clients (on purpose?).

I did not create a tempfix. I try to overcome a long existing problem by making something on my own, that anyone can use.

My walls implementation uses less CPU and RAM than geodata checking. Why? Less data to calculate than actual geodata blocks.

They are even better than the current door or zone data checking that already exists on all packs for years. Nno quadruple checks due to their flat nature, no gameobject implementions, just plain data checks.

As a second system it doesn't affect the performance of the server, since you can disable one or the other.

 

Are XML data more accurate than geodata? No.

But they... do the job pretty well, are easier to generate, easier to improve, use less system resources and are 100% free.

If you don't like them, don't use them and don't hit on my nerves.

Posted

You could simply take few mins/hours and see there are some already existing tools to edit geodata, such as G3DEditor.

 

http://www.l2jserver.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=94&t=21432

 

It's not a matter of being a "owner of knowledge" (Did I say that ? Did I treat you of "ignorant pleb" ? Did I say I was the "master of all L2J projects", the "one to rule them all" ?), but just pure and plain logic.

 

Before doing a work, you ask to yourself if it worths to do it, or if there isn't a better way to handle it. That's the b.a-ba question. And that's the question I'm currently asking when I see time has been used ("wasted" in this case, imho).

 

2 systems affecting the same thing it's like... Getting 2 NpcTable, affecting each other. Kinda nonsense.

Tryskell I'm not refer to you at least you feel offended , are ppl here they know how Im referred.  I know about that tool but like sdw said is not all ppl know edit geodata so we try find the way take less time and easy for understand. Like you can see on this posts they just know blame our work and in the end I can't see nothing useful in the last year. Sorry if I offended you was not my intention.  

Posted

 

It really looks that some people are bothered by the fact that anyone can make XML data.
 
I had my fan-times with generating geodata in the past, but buildzone seems broken on latest clients (on purpose?).
I did not create a tempfix. I try to overcome a long existing problem by making something on my own, that anyone can use.
My walls implementation uses less CPU and RAM than geodata checking. Why? Less data to calculate than actual geodata blocks.
They are even better than the current door or zone data checking that already exists on all packs for years. Nno quadruple checks due to their flat nature, no gameobject implementions, just plain data checks.
As a second system it doesn't affect the performance of the server, since you can disable one or the other.
 
Are XML data more accurate than geodata? No.
But they... do the job pretty well, are easier to generate, easier to improve, use less system resources and are 100% free.
If you don't like them, don't use them and don't hit on my nerves.

 

But as you (maybe) know, geodata is not for walls only, but for ground too. Generate XML which will contains all terrain object with all uneven grounds would be fckin HUGE.

About geo generating from client, it is still possible as you can see above.

Posted

This method is meant as a solution for those that can't afford to use geodata.

I am working on ground implementation as well.  :happyforever:

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I ended up sorting a similar mess by working with a team that handled everything from discovery to launch and kept things super clear. Their business website design approach made it easy for me to get a site that actually fit my goals, plus I kept full ownership of everything. The long-term support and simple pricing structure saved me a ton of headaches down the road.
    • Interface sources for P447 (7s update) for Classic/Essence   NWindow + InterfaceClassic + L2Editor + L2ClientDat Mobius + XDat Editor   Download
    • Hey there, welcome to the community – no worries about being new, we all started exactly where you are. Let me break this down based on what you’re trying to achieve with your Interlude‑Classic idea.   What you’re describing is actually a pretty popular concept: basically Interlude gameplay and balance, but with Classic‑style UI and a cleaner overall user experience. A “hybrid client”, not a full chronicle change.   Projects that have done something similar or are worth studying:   Lucera 2 – You’re right about this one. They use a custom client that blends Interlude gameplay with a more modern/Classic‑like interface. Their UI work (inventory, skill bar, lobby, etc.) is a good reference point.   L2J Mobius – Not exactly your target, but it’s very flexible and has a lot of examples of customizations and adaptations between chronicles.   Smaller custom projects – There are (or were) a few hybrid attempts using Interlude server files with heavily modified clients, but most are private or closed‑source, so you mainly get ideas, not ready‑to-use files.   Where the real challenge is (the client side):   What you want is possible, but the heavy lifting is on the client, not the server. The main pain points usually are:   Making sure interface files are compatible between chronicles (UI textures, layouts, systemmsg, etc.).   L2Font and localization edits: titles, chat, system messages – a small mistake here can break visuals or cause weird text issues.   Character selection / lobby screens: if you take them from another chronicle, you have to adapt them carefully so they don’t conflict with Interlude data.   Inventory, status bars and shortcuts: they must still work with Interlude’s item/skill structure and packet format, or you’ll get visual desyncs and client errors.   About multi‑protocol:   You’re correct that multi‑protocol is often used by projects that want to support different client versions or custom blends. In your case, it can help “talk” properly with a customized client while keeping an Interlude base server. It doesn’t magically fix everything, but it gives you more flexibility on how client and server exchange data.   Quick chronicle breakdown (relevant for your idea):   2.0–2.6: Early, simpler mechanics, good base for old‑school vibes.   2.7: More skills and better balance, often used as a base for custom projects.   2.9.5: A “bridge” between old and new, very common choice for hybrid or heavily modded setups.   3.0+: Adds Kamael and systems you said you don’t want, so you’d mainly use it as a reference, not as a direct base.   My honest recommendation:   Start from a solid Interlude base (files you understand and can actually maintain). Interlude still has the most support, tools and community knowledge.   Focus first on UI/interface modifications instead of trying to change core mechanics. Use Lucera‑style clients and similar projects as visual/technical reference.   Consider a multi‑protocol setup only after you’re comfortable with a normal Interlude client; otherwise you’ll just stack complexity.   Join active L2J / client‑mod Discords and forums. There are specific channels for interface, system edits and client reverse‑engineering where people share tips and tools.   What I would avoid at the beginning:   No intentar mezclar tres o cuatro chronicles a la vez; con uno bien entendido + UI custom ya tienes más que suficiente trabajo.   No subestimar la parte de cliente; muchas veces es más complicada y más frágil que el lado del servidor.   No saltarte el testeo en entorno local; los híbridos rompen cosas pequeñas (tooltips raros, skills que crashean el cliente, UI bugueada) si no pruebas bien.   Resources worth checking:   L2J forums and old MaxCheaters threads about faction/hybrid servers and client mods.   GitHub repos with client tools and interface mods (even si no son exactamente tu chronicle, te sirven como ejemplo).   Discord communities focused on L2 client development; ahí es donde se mueve hoy la parte “seria” del modding.   The good news: what you want is achievable, just not “plug & play”. It will require patience, testing and a bit of learning on both server and client sides. If you share exactly which files/pack you’re planning to use and what you want your UI to look like, people here (me included) can give you more concrete, step‑by‑step advice.
    • I’m done with Lineage 2. Not because I “grew up”, not because I “don’t have time for games” anymore, but because this game has slowly turned into everything it was supposed to be against.   Let’s be honest: most people are not playing Lineage 2 anymore. They are running 5–10 boxes, macros and scripts, setting up their characters and going to watch Netflix. The core loop isn’t PvP, clan wars or raids – it’s AFK grinding and praying your gear upgrades don’t fail.   The game used to be about outplaying your enemy with positioning, timing and coordination. Now it’s about:   Who has more boxes logged in.   Who is willing to swipe the credit card harder.   Who abuses the most broken script, cheat or exploit before it gets “patched”.   And let’s talk about pay‑to‑win. You can pretend it’s “supporting the server” all you want, but when someone can buy power that takes others months (or is literally impossible) to reach, that’s not support, that’s buying victories. When top players are just walking credit cards with epics, donations and event gear, you don’t have competition, you have a spending contest.   The community? It’s just as bad. Most “friends” are temporary party members until they find a better CP, clan or donation package. Drama, backstabbing, ninja looting, clan leaders selling clan resources, spies in Discord – it’s more like a cheap political simulator than an MMO. People talk about “honor” and “fair play”, then log their 10th box, run radar and target through walls.   And private servers… So many promises: “long‑term project”, “no corruption”, “no over‑enchant items”, “balanced gameplay”. Then after a few weeks you see:   Admin friends with full gear “testing”.   Hidden donations or “special offers” for “supporters”.   GMs closing their eyes to obvious abuse because it’s their buddies or biggest donors. Every wipe and every “fresh start” is just another cycle of the same lie, and we all pretend “this time will be different”.   The saddest part? Most of us know all this and still keep coming back because Lineage 2 has an insane core – the world, the classes, the adrenaline of real PvP, the politics, the sieges. But that core is buried under layers of greed, abuse, bots, scripts, egos and fake promises.   So here is the brutal truth: Lineage 2 is not a hardcore competitive MMORPG anymore. It’s a casino disguised as nostalgia, kept alive by whales, box armies and people too addicted or too hopeful to finally let go.   If you’re still playing, ask yourself honestly: Are you having fun, or are you just grinding, coping and praying that “next server” will finally be the one that isn’t corrupt, pay‑to‑win or dead in three months?   For me, I’m out. Flame me, defend the game, call me salty – I don’t care. But deep down, most of you know I’m not lying.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..