Jump to content
  • 0

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

You may tell us chronicle?

Obviously interlude ;)

 

Man, you could try l2jfrozen, not many bugs, lot of customs. IF you are searching for interlude. If you need another chronicle, just reply.

  • 0
Posted

Hmm for interlude, i was thinking of L2j but it has some bugs too.

Ok then,

If you wanna a clean code project,I would suggest you to take the last rev o aCis,

Now if you want it for a custom server and almost done(if I can say that),take l2jfrozen.

  • 0
Posted

I agree with Fanky, but you will get confused with l2jaCis, skills aren't ready, so it's not a 'good' option for a live server. Now, if you have the knownledge to customize + protect + fix your own pack, just take latest rev of l2j, and start working.

  • 0
Posted

I agree with Fanky, but you will get confused with l2jaCis, skills aren't ready, so it's not a 'good' option for a live server. Now, if you have the knownledge to customize + protect + fix your own pack, just take latest rev of l2j, and start working.

 

This is what i thought too.. so i believe L2j has less bugs than l2jfrozen right?

  • 0
Posted

Well yes I guess,l2j developers(Interlude) stopped develop the IL source from 2006,so yes.

L2jfrozen its active & still alive project plus they got their support forum in order to report bugs.

  • 0
Posted

Hello, I would like to ask which is the best pack, i mean which pack has the least bugs? I Need a pack without many features, but WITHOUT BUGS! Please tell me your opinion, thanks.

 

There is not a good pack for "bugs"!!!

 

There are good packs on skills reworking, quest, formula.... balance etc.

 

Well you can try L2JEmu or L2J for freya... but if you speaking about Interlude... i cannot help you.

  • 0
Posted

This is what i thought too.. so i believe L2j has less bugs than l2jfrozen right?

No, l2jfrozen has less bugs and lots of things have been 'reworked', but l2j is the best(l2jfree was, but it is dead) project to base on, in order to make your own bugless and 'as you want it to be' pack. But it has looooots of bugs and many programs like l2phx(i mean actions that you can do with it), aren't fixed in any way possible. So try l2jfrozen.

  • 0
Posted

don't know what to say guys..

I worked with l2jfrozen and still working..now i have a LOT of bugs..java errors...error after error..

 

First Rev's were preety good (no crush..no errors) Now is full of errors :| don't understand why..

  • 0
Posted

don't know what to say guys..

I worked with l2jfrozen and still working..now i have a LOT of bugs..java errors...error after error..

 

First Rev's were preety good (no crush..no errors) Now is full of errors :| don't understand why..

nowdays most errors on console [GS] are from UNCLOSEDCONNECTION i think .. i see that problem being reported continuesly, but i don't know why, i don't have that problem since rev. 601 :) so problem comes from people who uses pack, not from pack .. I THINK .. but about some other problems, what happens is almost the same, always people reporting things that are working, but not for them because have edited something wrong on config or core ... just check your whole config and they see, btw .. aCis is good, even better than L2JFrozen, the problem is that is not finished yet, so is a bit unstable :(

  • 0
Posted

Hey, stop with that "aCis is unstable" thing :P. It's perfectly stable. It can't be currently be used as live, but it's stable.

 

About Frozen, they made an experiment using boneCP instead the current C3P0 pooler than any project normally have. And for that, you can say it's experimental and non-live anymore, as aCis became non-live around rev 40 (but me I announced it wasn't non-live, when you, you think Frozen is still live-able).

 

I won't say aCis is better than Frozen. Frozen uses Scoria as base, they got a lot of stuff already made but inherits Scoria problems (as any pack have their own problems), so they have to correct inherent L2J problems, Scoria ones and avoiding to add own problems.

 

Both projects got a different public (light vs custom), goal (propose a clean base for any server type vs propose a end-based server) && conception ideals (refactor entirely parts of code will fix bugs vs fixing bugs without refactors). Both projects got PROS and CONS and different types of visitors.

 

A discussion with Shyla (on my forum 2 months ago, when aCis just born) ended with the fact my and his project just couldn't merge, because my PoV of what a server must offer is different of its PoV.

 

I stop with semi-offtopic, even if it's always interesting to know what happens in background :).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...