Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello guys,i'm posting a useful tool made by Bloodshed (L2jServer Dev).Read his comments below:

 

" Some of you who might find it not as easy to find items by Name or Id in the new XML format here is a little tool that might come in handy. You also have the option to show the item icon.

(You can browse through the item files (custom items should work too) or search the files)."

 

Application:

51151309.png

 

Connection Window:

53589255.png

 

Video:

L2j Item Viewer

 

Download (L2j Item Viewer V0.9)

http://www.4shared.com/file/utxm3j9w/L2J_Item_Viewer_v09.html

 

Bugs/Feedback,report at Bloodshed's Official L2j Item Viewer Topic.

 

Special thanks to L2jServer Community and Bloodshed  :)

 

[glow=green,2,300]Bloodshed,thanks for answering my request bro[/glow] ;)

 

Have fun guys.

Posted

This it's very usefull program :D!

 

Tested and work fine!, but u must show how to set the paths, because not all ppl know how to do that and u will fully of these kind of questions.-

 

Anyway great job!

 

PD: Sry for my broken english.

Posted

It is a tool rofl

 

Chandy many thanks for share this tool,very useful really brother :)

Regards mate.

Nope my friend,have fun and cya :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks
    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.
    • Your project doesn't compare to aCis; you have to be an idiot to use that. I know someone who bought the High Five "PREMIUM" version, which has the same bugs as the free version. If you want, I can share his latest premium version. Players are going through walls with their bad geoengine, falling under the Olympiad. If you want, I can record and prove what I'm saying. The aCis project is 50 steps ahead of yours and it's not even stable...
    • l2jteon, l2joneo l2jscoria etc etc. and from that we went to this 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock