Jump to content

Do you think Coronavirus Sars-Cov2 real or not?  

99 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think Coronavirus Sars-Cov2 real or not?

    • Yes of course its real.
      84
    • No its all fake.
      15
  2. 2. Do you think Coronavirus Sars-Cov2 is made in lab?

    • Yes, its made in laboratory.
      79
    • No its from nature.
      20


Recommended Posts

Posted

religious dogma is shit, but believing that there is no Great creator and that humans and their retarded technology is above all is beyond joke and that will lead to humanity's spiritual death and eventually to an unfortunate end

Posted (edited)

why do we need great creator to explain what we became? past 1k years of findings (unlike guessing and made up stories) and evolution shows that no extra input was needed for biological/cultural/technology to progress. With data we have you can extrapolate backwards and assume a lot without need of greater touch.

 

But yeah, i can see how humanity will end own cycle with greed and new weapons, sooner or later someone will pull the trigger and rollback whoever survives to medieval times :D

Edited by AlmostGood
Posted
29 minutes ago, xdem said:

religious dogma is shit, but believing that there is no Great creator and that humans and their retarded technology is above all is beyond joke and that will lead to humanity's spiritual death and eventually to an unfortunate end

 

Ancient-Aliens.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, xdem said:

religious dogma is shit, but believing that there is no Great creator and that humans and their retarded technology is above all is beyond joke and that will lead to humanity's spiritual death and eventually to an unfortunate end

 

I don't see the need for a great creator in order for humanity to be spiritual. But it surely comes down to the meaning of 'spiritual' in one's mind. For instance imo, spirituality translates to good mental health and self awareness achieved through meditation or therapy.

 

Besides this, suggesting that without religious beliefs people would head to self destruction is pointless since we have no proof in history of a civilization without religion that was self-destructed. It might even be better for the future of humanity and equality to be unattached from forced religous beliefs.

Posted
5 minutes ago, An4rchy said:

 

I don't see the need for a great creator in order for humanity to be spiritual. But it surely comes down to the meaning of 'spiritual' in one's mind. For instance imo, spirituality translates to good mental health and self awareness achieved through meditation or therapy.

 

Besides this, suggesting that without religious beliefs people would head to self destruction is pointless since we have no proof in history of a civilization without religion that was self-destructed. It might even be better for the future of humanity and equality to be unattached from forced religous beliefs.

though your definition is alright, there's one single literal and universal definition for spirituality, which is:
"the quality of being concerned with the human spirit or soul as opposed to material or physical things." so the point is, spirituality itself doesn't really mean anything 'till human 'spirits' or 'souls' are proven to exist, same with w/e religious/theistic bullshit.

 

To summarize, there is no good reason to believe in the supernatural until proven otherwise.

 

Posted

I get what you mean, but such unclear terms (meaning they refer to things we're not sure even exist) like spirituality, people can translate them to their own understanding.

 

I agree with your statement about the supernatural.

Posted
1 hour ago, An4rchy said:

I get what you mean, but such unclear terms (meaning they refer to things we're not sure even exist) like spirituality, people can translate them to their own understanding.

 

I agree with your statement about the supernatural.

Yup, it's just that usually, from experience, 'personal definitions' tend to bend "debates" until everyone agrees on a certain definition, so it's good to avoid the topic of personal definitions and just go with literal definitions instead, it's a nice trick to avoid all the "spirituality" or paranormal bullshit xD

Posted (edited)

the great creator can not be defined in a human's mind, never by definition. Its what put order in the universe's chaos and its much much much more inteligent than humans, its able to interact with time itself as easy as we interact with matter, its multi-dimensional, and whatever drugs you take we will never be able to sense it with our limited physicall senses and perception of the world arround us.

 

Our maths can't explain nature, they are two dimensional, so we invented imaginary numbers that we don't understand to solve  math problems, multi-dimensions do exist and its proven by science, the world arround you is muuuuuuuch more complex than your mind can ever comprehend

Edited by xdem
Posted
2 hours ago, xdem said:

the great creator can not be defined in a human's mind, never by definition. Its what put order in the universe's chaos and its much much much more inteligent than humans, its able to interact with time itself as easy as we interact with matter, its multi-dimensional, and whatever drugs you take we will never be able to sense it with our limited physicall senses and perception of the world arround us.

 

Our maths can't explain nature, they are two dimensional, so we invented imaginary numbers that we don't understand to solve  math problems, multi-dimensions do exist and its proven by science, the world arround you is muuuuuuuch more complex than your mind can ever comprehend

I think we all agree that there are thing we might never get to explain, though there is literally no good reason to assume, out of nowhere, without any kind of evidence whatsoever, that there is such thing as a 'great creator' (the argument that a creation is evidence for a creator has been debunked for a long ass time now)

You're just making up a random deity, saying that we can't possibly understand how it 'works', and start stacking up characteristics on it afterwards, it kinda doesn't make any sense.

 

I know you're a smart guy so i suppose we'd agree on the statement that there's no good reason to believe in something until it's proven otherwise, so where are you getting all this stuff about a great creator from?

Posted (edited)

proven using what? I told you our senses are so limited and so is our logic, there is nothing that you have to prove or even have, would you care if a colony of termites somewhere in Sahara had conspirancies and debates about human existance ? you would never even care a little bit

Edited by xdem
Posted (edited)

Then whatever you say about that matter is just an assumption and there is, again, no good reason to believe that things are what you say they are. Something being undeniable doesn't isn't automatically true


So, once again, if you say that there is such thing as a great creator, then proceed to say that it is 'outside of space, omniscient, omnipotent' or whatever you wanna assign to it, why would you believe in it even though you don't have a good reason to believe in it?

Edited by 911reg
Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, 911reg said:

Then whatever you say about that matter is just an assumption and there is, again, no good reason to believe that things are what you say they are. Something being undeniable doesn't isn't automatically true


So, once again, if you say that there is such thing as a great creator, then proceed to say that it is 'outside of space, omniscient, omnipotent' or whatever you wanna assign to it, why would you believe in it even though you don't have a good reason to believe in it?

 

as I told you earlier, we already know other dimensions exist, if our difference from a termite to a human is so huge in our understanding while we both are on the same dimension, you can only guess how vast the gap of a interdimensional being is. there is no need to prove anything, observation is enough, proofs are for science, human science won't ever actually prove what by definition it cannot prove

Edited by xdem
Posted
29 minutes ago, xdem said:

 

as I told you earlier, we already know other dimensions exist, if our difference from a termite to a human is so huge in our understanding while we both are on the same dimension, you can only guess how vast the gap of a interdimensional being is. there is no need to prove anything, observation is enough, proofs are for science, human science won't ever actually prove what by definition it cannot prove

The point i'm trying to make here is, there is literally no reason to believe that there is such thing as an interdimensional being, and even less if there are no indications nor proof of it, though i see where you're coming from. I personally would rather say 'i don't know' before assuming stuff i don't know, so i'm genuinely curious as to why would anyone believe there is such thing as a creator, whatever religion it is from, or if it is from a religion at all

Posted (edited)

*****CORONA FAKE****** coronas in my ass ! Yes u all  hear it  and u all idiots if u  believe in this shit  get  a celebration instead of sooooooooooooooooorow !  

 

Edited by MrTitanas
Posted
3 hours ago, MrTitanas said:

*****CORONA FAKE****** coronas in my ass ! Yes u all  hear it  and u all idiots if u  believe in this shit  get  a celebration instead of sooooooooooooooooorow !  

 

jaja

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • Luniage - a custom Interlude client on Unity, with its own server Hi everyone. I've been quietly working on this for a long time and I think it's finally at the point where it's worth showing. Short version: it's Interlude, but the client and the server are both mine. The client is a custom one, built in Unity — not a patched or reskinned original. The server is written from scratch in C#. The only thing that comes from the old game is the content: the world, the models, the animations, the sounds, the icons, the interface art. The game looks and feels like the game you know. Everything underneath it is new. Why do this at all   Because the old client is a 2004 executable and anyone who has ever tried to add something to it knows exactly how that conversation ends. You can't add a window. You can't change how a skill looks. You can't fix a bug that's staring you in the face. Every server that wanted a feature of its own had to fake it through HTML dialogs and system messages, because the client simply won't bend. At some point it stops being worth fighting. I'd rather keep the game and rebuild everything around it. Where it is right now   You can sit down and play it. Not a tech demo, not a walk-around-and-look-at-the-trees build - an actual character. Most of the game is in: movement, combat, the skill system with its real formulas and timings, items and equipment, enchanting, shops and player trade, quests, parties, clans, and the whole interface that ties it together. Progression works from level 1 all the way through A grade - you can level, gear up, join a clan and run content today. What's missing isn't the foundation. It's the top end - and that's exactly where the work is pointed next.   Videos     What I'm working on now   Castle sieges and the Olympiad. The two biggest systems the game has, the ones that turn a working world into a server people actually stay on. And visual effects. They already run, but "runs" and "looks the way you remember it" are two very different things, and closing that gap turned out to be a much longer road than I expected. I'm going through them one by one. Does it run outside Windows   Yes. It's a Unity project, so Windows, Mac and Linux are just build targets. I actually develop on a Mac, which has kept the whole thing honest about staying portable. Will it work with my existing server   No, and it never will. The client talks to my server and nothing else - that's the trade I made, and it's the reason everything above is possible in the first place. If you're looking for a drop-in replacement client for a setup you already have, this isn't it. What's the goal   First and foremost, to launch my own project on it. That's what the client and the server are being built for, and that's what sets the priorities. Longer term, I'd like to open-source it. This community has spent twenty years working around a client nobody can touch, and I think the honest ending to this story is handing over something people can actually build on. I'm not putting a date on that - first it has to be good enough to be worth someone else's time. Can I try it   Not yet. When there's a build worth handing out, it gets posted here first. In the meantime I'll be posting progress regularly, and I read every reply. If you've run a server, built a client, or just spent a decade staring at this game and know exactly which detail everyone gets wrong — please say so. A good share of what's right in this project is right because somebody pointed at a screenshot and said "that's not how it looked." Thanks for reading.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..