Jump to content

L2ACP  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you think would be better

    • An ACP where players can do basic account stuff, buy donation coins and spend them on items/enchants/augments (Would cost 30 euros per month)
      1
    • An ACP that has the above but also an admin area where admins will be able to manage the server (restart,chat,jail,kick,ban) (Would cost 50-60 euros per month)
      0
    • An ACP that has the above plus some custom features. (Would cost a one time purchase per feature + the previous monthly fee)
      3
    • All of the above, but give the customer the choice to choose their package
      17


Recommended Posts

Posted

So it looks like you will be able to record all account passwords, make fake donations etc. I doubt any big server could go for it.

lol for this thinking never 1 big server can trust ( smart-guard , rguard , nprotect maybe )

or from this side all is safe ?  wake up bro :)

Posted

lol for this thinking never 1 big server can trust ( smart-guard , rguard , nprotect maybe )

or from this side all is safe ?  wake up bro :)

I have to agree with pirama on this one.

 

Smartguard and such can have way worse things inside them not to mention potential malware, which you will never know about.

My little ACP is way less dangerous that whatever those servers are using.

It is know to report most of your server's data back to them anyway.

Posted

lol for this thinking never 1 big server can trust ( smart-guard , rguard , nprotect maybe )

or from this side all is safe ?  wake up bro :)

Akumu was gaining trust since years.

Posted

You can't compare a harmless client protection with an interface that can send any command that the gameserver will blindly accept.

Its apples to oranges on all aspects, none will grant 101% access level to a foreign web server that costs as low as 40 euros, no matter if its trusted or not. It simply won't work like that.

 

I know you want to be able to have full control over your interface, avoid leaks, cracks etc but none will compromise his server's security for the luxury of this ACP.

 

ISP and IPS forums are good examples of great web software that got cracked and will be cracked over and over again, but they still know that there's no other way.

 

Worst case scenario for you, a big name of the scene that wants this ACP will simply hire a developer to make one for himself, none is gonna trade traffic with a foreign server

Posted (edited)

You can't compare a harmless client protection with an interface that can send any command that the gameserver will blindly accept.

Its apples to oranges on all aspects, none will grant 101% access level to a foreign web server that costs as low as 40 euros, no matter if its trusted or not. It simply won't work like that.

 

I know you want to be able to have full control over your interface, avoid leaks, cracks etc but none will compromise his server's security for the luxury of this ACP.

 

ISP and IPS forums are good examples of great web software that got cracked and will be cracked over and over again, but they still know that there's no other way.

 

Worst case scenario for you, a big name of the scene that wants this ACP will simply hire a developer to make one for himself, none is gonna trade traffic with a foreign server

Smartguard is not a harmless client proteciton. Check the traffic that you are sending to their servers. They have control over everything server related but also client related. (And btw it doesnt even protect you)

SaaS products are the future and everyone is using them. Don't wanna use them? Not my problem, you can spend way more on worse products. I can live with it.

 

There is nothing to compromise unless the gameserver itself gets hacked. In fact i challenge anyone in here to try and hack or abuse my final version.

If they do i will release the whole system for free.

 

If people don't wanna trust it that's fine by me, i will still sell it.

Edited by .Elfocrash
Posted

Smartguard is not a harmless client proteciton. Check the traffic that you are sending to their servers. They have control over everything server related but also client related. (And btw it doesnt even protect you)

SaaS products are the future and everyone is using them. Don't wanna use them? Not my problem, you can spend way more on worse products. I can live with it.

 

There is nothing to compromise unless the gameserver itself gets hacked. In fact i challenge anyone in here to try and hack or abuse my final version.

If they do i will release the whole system for free.

 

If people don't wanna trust it that's fine by me, i will still sell it.

 

SmartGuard can do anything it wants only on the client side, on the server side the code is minimal and its up to the developer to take care of it, whereas your ACP has full control over the gameserver. I am not trying to be a smartass here or go against your product, I just want to say that this comparison is retarded, on top of it a big retard put it on the table.

Posted

SmartGuard can do anything it wants only on the client side, on the server side the code is minimal and its up to the developer to take care of it, whereas your ACP has full control over the gameserver. I am not trying to be a smartass here or go against your product, I just want to say that this comparison is retarded, on top of it a big retard put it on the table.

Does smartguard give you the source of the client to see what's happening? Nah.

The API is fully open source to the buyer and the requests are limited to the functionality. They all have logging so the admin can see who sent what.

 

I'm fully transparent and i have nothing to hide.

 

uk609vV.png

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • L2JMobius C1 System C1 + bonus textures C3 for C1 https://www.mediafire.com/folder/6oh7l7hf34xr9/C1
    • https://prnt.sc/Bkkc0ShGXv9m https://prnt.sc/-JFLvZXsn27A
    • Hello guys want to sell adena in L2 Reborn Signature x1  Stock =14kk good price 
    • Hi guys, I have the following problem, I want to set up two servers on the same dedicated server and I can't.   L2jacis 409 Linux Server. The first gameserver has the following configuration: # ================================================================ # Gameserver setting # ================================================================ # This is transmitted to the clients, so it has to be an IP or resolvable hostname. If this ip is resolvable by Login just leave * Hostname = 190.25.103.103 # Bind ip of the gameserver, use * to bind on all available IPs. GameserverHostname = * GameserverPort = 7777 # The Loginserver host and port. LoginHost = 127.0.0.1 LoginPort = 9014 # This is the server id that the gameserver will request. RequestServerID = 1 # If set to true, the login will give an other id to the server (if the requested id is already reserved). AcceptAlternateID = True UseBlowfishCipher = True # ================================================================ # Database informations # ================================================================ URL = jdbc:mariadb://localhost/server1 Login = server1 Password = server1 I configured the second gameserver like this:   # ================================================================ # Gameserver setting # ================================================================ # This is transmitted to the clients, so it has to be an IP or resolvable hostname. If this ip is resolvable by Login just leave * Hostname = 0.0.0.0 # Bind ip of the gameserver, use * to bind on all available IPs. GameserverHostname = * GameserverPort = 7788 # The Loginserver host and port. LoginHost = 127.0.0.1 LoginPort = 9014 # This is the server id that the gameserver will request. RequestServerID = 2 # If set to true, the login will give an other id to the server (if the requested id is already reserved). AcceptAlternateID = True UseBlowfishCipher = True # ================================================================ # Database informations # ================================================================ URL = jdbc:mariadb://localhost/server2 Login = server2 Password = server2 apart from having tested 0.0.0.0 on the second gameserver I also tried 127.0.0.1 In both cases I see the two servers in the login when I log in, but I try to enter the one with the lowest ping and it kicks me out. The other server always appears with ping 9999 and I try to enter but it doesn't do anything and it freezes the login so I have to log in again. The hexids are in their respective folders. For server 1, it has its hexid inside the gameserver config folder, and I checked that the hexid id is the same id, for example id 1 in the gameserver is also id1 for server 1, and hexid 2 has its hexid 2 for server 2. The server ports are open and listening when I turn on both gameservers. I really don't know what could be wrong. If you could give me some help I would appreciate it. Excuse my English.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...