Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There is no dedicated section for L2dotNET development as this is a whole new thing for l2 development in general, so until we get to a point that more people can jump in and help, it is and will be hosted under the l2j section.

 

Think before posting.

i don't need to think this ... you are mod create new session or change the rule's

i think C# is and l2off server why dont move it on they session ?

Posted

Ofc it is not off. it is nothing like off. It is it's own think. But it follows the l2j principle of being an emulator.

 

L2OFF is not L2OFF because it is C++ but because is it the actual official files.

i dont said that ...  C# and C++ have more commons than java and C#

you share this but i dont see tutorial for install , compile , add code , edit ( they dont have nothing same like l2j )

Posted

HAHAAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHA.

 

C# in it's core look EXACTLY like java and nohting like C#.

Mate you embarrass yourself. 

Wanna know how to install? Join our gitter. Wanna join our test server? Join our gitter.

Just stop embarrassing yourself and know what you are talking about.

not coming embarrassed... do not be fooled

if is nothing like C# why you work C# and not java ? i can't figure ... can you help me ?

Posted (edited)

Because there are more languages than java that can do cool things. Also I am way more proficient in C#.

 

C# in it's core look EXACTLY like java and nohting like C#.

you are proficient in C# and for that you create this project ... nice !!!

but this project core is like java and nothing like C# ... wtf ?

i can't understand what are you saying

 

good luck again for your project ( is like java and you create it why you is proficient in C# and nothing is in core is like C# )

omg .....

 

good luck again

Edited by pirama
Posted (edited)

The project is built in a completely different architecture and design. It is nothing like l2j.

if nothing like l2j ?

realy ( nice job ) but ... this session is for l2j project and this project ( as you said is C# ) why you create topic on l2j ?

read before posting

 

If you need to to explain then ping me on skype.

sorry but in me skype i have only friend's ( i told you before 6 months :P )

but i think you need new session for this project is not l2j

if every one believe i spam plz report me is eazy 

Edited by pirama
Posted

Oh for fuck sake what do you want? Pm Maxtor and ask him to add a whole new section for L2dotNET projects because it is a whole new category.

There has never been something like that before.

 

It is L2OFF, L2J and now L2dotNET.

Three completely different things. I don't know how else i can explain it for you small brain to understand.

Posted (edited)

Oh for fuck sake what do you want? Pm Maxtor and ask him to add a whole new section for L2dotNET projects because it is a whole new category.

There has never been something like that before.

 

It is L2OFF, L2J and now L2dotNET.

Three completely different things. I don't know how else i can explain it for you small brain to understand.

you see ? you understant what i said 100% :)

and imagine what I said from the first post :P

 

realy ( nice job ) but ... this session is for l2j project and this project ( as you said is C# ) why you create topic on l2j ?

read before posting

 

i don't need to think this ... you are mod create new session or change the rule's

i think C# is and l2off server why dont move it on they session ?

You are smart kid finally ( 3 hours later )

 

 

No words pirama. Better read 1st page and stop posting nonsense.

and you can read me post's

Edited by pirama

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..