Jump to content

[L2Off / L2J] Another Crappy Bot Protection Starting From 55€ (Interlude / High Five)


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Any news about Vang's ext ?

HOP HOP ?

 

As discussed on skype.


 

Special

 

The next 2 customers will get the antibot with lifetime license for 75€ (valid for l2j version and until 12 Feb.)

Edited by Asmodeus
Posted

Regarding l2off, We have talked with Vanganth and he agreed to implement acbp server side in his extender. I have sent him the instructions for the changes I need to be done and waiting for the resultz.


About h5 I won't start developing it until I see there is interest on buying it.

 


 

New pricing scheme!

interesting.. waiting for ur answer.
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Lifetime license is the biggest mistake. Monthly payment keeps developers updating the product.

  • Extra month of support and updates: 10€

So he got a monthly fee.

Posted (edited)

Lifetime license is the biggest mistake. Monthly payment keeps developers updating the product.

 

My plan was to make a affordable but working antibot solution. When the clientbase I desire will be reached I will stop accepting new customers and work only with the existing ones. I have already declined subscription for 3 potential clients due to either newbieness or lameness.

 

So as you understand money is not my priority. I'm not living of this. Monthly fee enslaves the developer to provide constant support, something I try to avoid, due to lack of time. I prefer to work with people who have a little bit of general computer usage to avoid explaining every single crap.

 

I offer open source server side for handling stuff, which is a basic implemention of a hwid/multibox/ban system. If I had a monthly fee and I'd accept newbies my skype would be spammed the whole day, with questions such as "how to limit olympiad with HWID?", "how to set different ban time for phx?", and such..

 

I think you got my point.

 

Best regards, thanks for your suggestion.

Edited by Asmodeus
Posted

Just to you know, Im still waiting for hi5 version ^^ Im keeping on eye here (:

 

If you are really interested in the h5 version we could talk about it in private, the reason is that I don't like to "cook food" to "eat it" myself.

Posted

If you are really interested in the h5 version we could talk about it in private, the reason is that I don't like to "cook food" to "eat it" myself.

Can you send me a pm with your skype? :)

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • aCis (“another Crappy interlude server”) is a commercial project I would not use even if paid. l2jfrozen yes, a 10 year old, effectively dead project produces more reliable results and at least works. l2jhellas also works. aCis might as well be renamed KPMIS (“Keep Paying My Interlude Server”): endless fixes, freemium, and no realistic path to true L2OFF parity, but its recommended like hell. lucera is even better the downside is you just need to dive into code and no sources   lets leave it at that
    • Download Here: https://sitehunterus.blogspot.com/2025/12/exelo-combo-tool-v2.html VirusTotal https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2acd067847ee092c7986f55c9f77620d89505d1c0bda34a0ee8f55b9c2905c11?nocache=1 Visit my Blogger list to download 100% free software https://www.freetoolss.com/ https://blackhat8.blogspot.com/ https://hack-crack9.blogspot.com/ https://hackernoons.blogspot.com/ https://sharetools99.blogspot.com/
    • Care to detail why ?   L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).   About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).   In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :   Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.   I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.   409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).
    • better than using 409... Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock