Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi :) Since lameguard is so ancient and many people prefer tower over other bots, i decided do upload the bypass for l2tower. This will also prevent you from getting banned. Happy botting ~~

Load the Bypass.dll with ur favourite inejctor at login or char selection screen and wait for the messagebox (up to 10 seconds usually).

Then load tower into process, log in, voila! In newer tower u have to mess around with injection settings.

 

http://imgur.com/ndDUj85

http://imgur.com/NVihCWL

 

Let me know if it worked below, thanks!

 

Link: http://www33.zippyshare.com/v/FBgYwDZ7/file.html

 

And please dont pm me for other antibots, i may do some stuff when im free ^_^

Edited by Szakalaka
Posted

Nice nice...If its working, good job :P! Thanks for sharing this...Even if i hate tower i may use this one sometime.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Of course the protectors dont like debuggers :) It is complex stuff but the good fact is that every file packed with the same protector uses the same antidebug checks so they are widely known and documented, just look it up somewhere. Unpacking isnt easy tho, but there is no need to do so, just observer gameguard.des during runtime.

Posted

Hello and thanks for the answer.

 

I RE'd your dll and i've seen that you patched gameguard.des (No c/p, i swear!) but my problem is that I cant find where the l2.bin calls the gameguard.des or where its loaded. I scanned threads with ProcessExplorer but i can't find it, so i was trying to Debug l2.bin during runtime so I find when it calls the module. 

Posted (edited)

No problem that someone reversed my dll. If i wanted people not do so i would make obfuscation + pack, but i just left it alone so people actually may see what do i patch AND THEN thnk "why he does patch this and why it works ?". It is much better than spoonfeeding random people :)

 

And if u ask how it loads: its either LoadLibrary or import from the l2.bin i dont remember. But if u cant load the target in debugger then its irrelevant because u wont see it anyways

 

Btw wow you got acc from 2006 :D

Edited by Szakalaka
Posted (edited)

Hey again,

 

Yes i've been leecher for many years in this forum. I've joined when i was 10 years old? Anyway, I had some progress yesterday, i found the load of gameguard.des also i managed to debug the l2.bin,but there's another protection of Themida which sets a breakpoint when you try to modify l2.bin. :)

 

Gameguard.des uses XOR encryption btw?

Edited by fxb0t
Posted

Well you cannot modify l2.bin without unpacking but its not needed to unpack it. You are writing a bot, not some crack so packer means literally ntohing because u focus on runtime.

 

By the way, what do you want to achieve in the end?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • aCis (“another Crappy interlude server”) is a commercial project I would not use even if paid. l2jfrozen yes, a 10 year old, effectively dead project produces more reliable results and at least works. l2jhellas also works. aCis might as well be renamed KPMIS (“Keep Paying My Interlude Server”): endless fixes, freemium, and no realistic path to true L2OFF parity, but its recommended like hell. lucera is even better the downside is you just need to dive into code and no sources   lets leave it at that
    • Download Here: https://sitehunterus.blogspot.com/2025/12/exelo-combo-tool-v2.html VirusTotal https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/2acd067847ee092c7986f55c9f77620d89505d1c0bda34a0ee8f55b9c2905c11?nocache=1 Visit my Blogger list to download 100% free software https://www.freetoolss.com/ https://blackhat8.blogspot.com/ https://hack-crack9.blogspot.com/ https://hackernoons.blogspot.com/ https://sharetools99.blogspot.com/
    • Care to detail why ?   L2JHellas probably got the same issue, it's inherent to L2J if you don't rework Player intentions (and solving it with a Config < 500 attack is stupid, if it works for attack it works for other types of desires), also last time I checked L2JHellas he was using my changesets to fix its own stuff (which is ok, copy-paste my knownlist system which is 10y old is fine, but don't say it will act different since it's literally the same sub-system).   About Lucera code source isn't available so it's easy to say it's better, internally you got no clue what is happening and RU forks got the "feeling" to get everything, but everything is half done, everytime I put an eye on such sources (whatever based on l2ru, they only know how to copy-paste each other).   In the other hand, you seem to use aCis since years (I think I see your name since a decade, and you still use it since you made this topic :   Be a little more appreciative about the work done, it's not only mine but my community aswell, and if you find something, consider to report rather than getting such an idiotic behavior.   I understand you're not forced to share any type of fixes, and than people tend to feel superior when they fix something than aCis didn't yet fix. The thing is, for each bug you found, I found and fixed 10x more than you.   409 is way beyond 382 in all possible ways, if you believe the versus good for you, but don't make ppl believe it's the case, because it's not. There's at least 400+ fixed issues (and that's counting 10 issues by revision, which is kinda low) and entire new systems (spawns, SCHs, pathfind, whole AI implemented, Desire system,...).
    • better than using 409... Search for L2jHellas or Lucera and you won't have any headaches.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock