Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

.control 

Where should i write this command? I tried to l2 client, but nothing happened. Can you explain more? Becouse that sound is annoying. :)

Posted

Where should i write this command? I tried to l2 client, but nothing happened. Can you explain more? Becouse that sound is annoying. :)

.cfg .control idk what your server got,

 

but u need open new dialog window 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
  function SetForegroundWindow(hwnd: integer) : Boolean; stdcall;
    external 'user32.dll';

    function captcha:boolean; begin
             if engine.dlgtext.contains('Refresh') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('Captcha') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('60 seconds') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('Bot')   then begin
       SetForegroundWindow(Engine.GameWindow);             
      PlaySound(exepath+'\sounds\'+'PlayerAlarm'+'.wav');
      delay(500);  
      StopSound;
          end;   
  end;
begin
  while true do begin
  delay(300);
   captcha();
end;
end.

can be converted for l2tower scripts?

Edited by powercheats
Posted
  function SetForegroundWindow(hwnd: integer) : Boolean; stdcall;
    external 'user32.dll';

    function captcha:boolean; begin
             if engine.dlgtext.contains('Refresh') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('Captcha') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('60 seconds') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('Bot')   then begin
       SetForegroundWindow(Engine.GameWindow);             
      PlaySound(exepath+'\sounds\'+'PlayerAlarm'+'.wav');
      delay(500);  
      StopSound;
          end;   
  end;
begin
  while true do begin
  delay(300);
   captcha();
end;
end.

can be converted for l2tower scripts?

 

i think yea, if you know tower script language

Posted
  function SetForegroundWindow(hwnd: integer) : Boolean; stdcall;
    external 'user32.dll';

    function captcha:boolean; begin
             if engine.dlgtext.contains('Refresh') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('Captcha') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('60 seconds') or
             engine.dlgtext.contains('Bot')   then begin
       SetForegroundWindow(Engine.GameWindow);             
      PlaySound(exepath+'\sounds\'+'PlayerAlarm'+'.wav');
      delay(500);  
      StopSound;
          end;   
  end;
begin
  while true do begin
  delay(300);
   captcha();
end;
end.

can be converted for l2tower scripts?

 

xaxa oh my god it looks for dlgtext :D, such stupid way of doing captcha, in dialog but not in other window....

Posted

xaxa oh my god it looks for dlgtext :D, such stupid way of doing captcha, in dialog but not in other window....

so if you are verry smart guy write and share to all. or you just talk?

Posted

xaxa oh my god it looks for dlgtext :D, such stupid way of doing captcha, in dialog but not in other window....

what other window lol?

it's same sh1t if it's npc dialog or tutorial.

Posted (edited)

so if you are verry smart guy write and share to all. or you just talk?

I've allready done something simmiliar,

better way is with tut window(you cant close it) and capcha as an image,

 

 

In plus you can send 3 times just a tut window that popus up and say - hello, but at 4th time, it would ask to enter captcha, so this alarm would annoy you even there is no need for captcha to enter, there is even other ways i guess, to make different window(by client) and bind it, so it would have different name - the one bot don't know, thats even better.

Edited by LightFusion
Posted

I've allready done something simmiliar,

better way is with tut window and capcha as an image,

haha, your "better way" captcha is 4 rows of script to bypass, gj on wasting time.

Posted

haha, your "better way" captcha is 4 rows of script to bypass, gj on wasting time.

lol bypass what isnt done as i wanted ? its just an example, i could  do it better if its needed, dont talk about something you dont know for sure.

Posted (edited)

lol bypass what isnt done as i wanted ? its just an example, i could  do it better if its needed, dont talk about something you dont know for sure.

work with this many time, and come one guy who know better script language and bypass in 5min xD

 

EDIT: and btw not all servers use like this so gg xd

Edited by adr.bot
Posted

work with this many time, and come one guy who know better script language and bypass in 5min xD

 

EDIT: and btw not all servers use like this so gg xd

wut ?:D lol did you read this code or not ? 

  if engine.dlgtext.contains('Refresh') or

it looks for dialog text, even more it looks for something that is writed there, what i pruposed is to make a window that contains only images - captcha itself(digits) and image that says that you need to enter it. But there is even more -it might be possible to change the tutorial window name, or even change tutorial window itself to something other - that is not engine.dlgtext, engine.tutorialwindow, in these case - your script is useless, if you dont know the real name of the window, or a way to get it.

Posted

wut ? :D lol did you read this code or not ? 

  if engine.dlgtext.contains('Refresh') or

it looks for dialog text, even more it looks for something that is writed there, what i pruposed is to make a window that contains only images - captcha itself(digits) and image that says that you need to enter it. But there is even more -it might be possible to change the tutorial window name, or even change tutorial window itself to something other - that is not engine.dlgtext, engine.tutorialwindow, in these case - your script is useless, if you dont know the real name of the window, or a way to get it.

yea, im not say i come and bypass your captcha, becouse i just begginer to learn :D i just say who know better script language and can bypass, like other guys selling full auto captcha, so i dont think if its cant be bypassed :D

Posted

lol bypass what isnt done as i wanted ? its just an example, i could  do it better if its needed, dont talk about something you dont know for sure.

till u make some bypass, l2 will be finally dead. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • I think you should check the video more carefully you missing something very important 😛      
    • Im responding to an anonymous account with 3 posts, almost no background, and practically zero useful information added to the discussion. On top of that, the topic title is misleading  calling it "Lucera Source Code" gives a completely different impression from what is actually being presented.   I didn’t say anything different. Therefore, I have no clue how his process produces the same desirable result.   And here you are creating drama. Your topic title clearly says "Lucera Source Code," which is not actually the case, or at least that’s how it looked when I first clicked on it, so I don’t think I was completely off. There’s also no significant information about your process like  what difficulties you faced, what tools you used, or anything else meaningful. Yet you still expect others to provide value based on what? I’m not talking about your project itself which, by the way, good job. I’m talking about the topic itself as a source of value for this forum, because right now it doesn’t really offer much in that regard. So regarding the semantics, yes, wording does matter.  
    • You are funny guy! 😄 😄 😄    I was working with Lucera long before “AI apps” became fashionable. This was not something I generated in one day with a prompt. It took me years of work, testing, debugging and fixing broken decompiled code.   Of course a decompiled source is not the original private repository with the original comments, history and developer structure. Nobody said it is the same Git repository. But saying it is only “guesses” is also wrong.   When you decompile, rebuild, fix thousands of compile/runtime issues, restore broken logic, reconnect scripts, fix bad casts, repair database calls, compile it again and run it in-game, at that point it is no longer just a guess.   It becomes a working reconstructed source base!   The important part is not whether it is byte-for-byte identical to the original private source. The important part is that I can now work directly inside the code, change core logic, rebuild scripts, fix bugs and continue development without being locked behind closed binaries.   Does it compile? Yes. Does it run in-game? Yes. Can I modify core systems directly? Yes. Can I continue development independently? Yes.   So call it reconstructed, decompiled, cleaned, restored or whatever name you prefer. The result is still the same: I have a working source environment that gives me control over the lucera2 project.   And that was exactly the goal!   🙂 
    • You clearly have no idea who you're talking to.   I've been working in the cheat industry for years and have developed cheats for multiple games, including projects that operate at kernel level and bypass protections far more advanced than anything Lineage 2 has ever had. Compared to that, Lineage 2 is low tier and technically simple.   As for the topic title, it's perfectly fine. The only thing I forgot is that this forum hasn't changed after all these years. It's still full of people who would rather argue semantics and act like experts than contribute anything meaningful to the discussion. Whether you call it reverse engineering, reconstruction, or educated guesses doesn't change the fact that the result works and achieves its purpose.   Honestly, I don't think there's any reason for me to keep posting here. Most of the replies add nothing of value and only prove why many experienced developers stopped sharing their work on this forum years ago.       Nobody said Lucera is a bad product. In fact, the reason people spend time decompiling it is because it is a good product and has value.   What I find funny is that everyone openly acknowledges that Lucera gets decompiled, yet when someone actually discusses the technical side of it, people suddenly act like it's some impossible or mythical process.   Reverse engineering software is nothing new. It has existed for decades and happens in every industry, from games to operating systems to commercial applications. Lucera is no exception.     I never said Deazer is a bad developer. Quite the opposite, he's a skilled developer and Lucera is one of the most stable projects I've worked with.   My only criticism is that, as a customer, you're heavily dependent on him. If he's willing to help, you'll get an answer quickly. If he's not interested in the issue or simply doesn't feel like dealing with it, then you're left to research and solve it on your own.   That's not necessarily a technical problem with Lucera itself, it's just one of the downsides of relying on a closed source project where a lot depends on a single developer.   From a stability standpoint, though, Lucera has always been among the best files available in my experience.
    • Scammers inc.  What you want to learn? Cooding? or just work with data files on builds.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..