Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have few ideas what to buy..if any1 have some experiances with this car, would be cool to share :)

 

1. Alpha Romeo 147

2. Peugeot 206

3. Skoda Fabia

4. Fiat Stillo

5. Wolswaguen , Golf 4

6. Renault Clio

 

Ofc i am talking about used car, around 2001 year of car..

Ty for any advices ;)

Posted

Wolswagen golf is nice, but uses too much petrol on my opinion. Skoda, is like Wolkswagen but cheaper and low in quality. An Alpha romeo is not bad aswell but I personally don't like the alpha romeos desings but they are good cars.

Posted (edited)

My brother used to have a fiat stillo. Its a good car. Leight and fast for its category and It think its not a financial burden.

Edited by JohnBoy13
Posted

My brother used to have a fiat stillo. Its a good car. Leight and fast for its category and It think its not a financial burden.

Agree about Stilo but for me its myb most ugly car from all 6 :(

Posted

 

1. Alpha Romeo 147

2. Peugeot 206

3. Skoda Fabia

4. Fiat Stillo

5. Wolswaguen , Golf 4

6. Renault Clio

 

I wouldnt buy a shits like these ones. Only  the Gold and the Clio are good. For this money i would take Opel Astra OPC

Posted
1. Advantages: Medium consumption, average price in parts.

    Disadvantages: Not much comfortable not bad either. It could have some problems since italian engines does not hold through years. (same goes for other engines too)

 

2. Advantages: Medium-high consumption, cheap parts & they can be found easy.

    Disadvantages: comfortable (for 4 passengers), it has a strong engine (pretty good at road - also it doesn't have many problems through years)

 

3. Advantages: Low consumption, cheap parts but it's not easy to find them since it didn't had much sales.

    Disadvantages: 50% comfortable,  not enough spaces. (Trunk is fine)

 

4. Avoid it in any case, its engine isn't good. Also, it's not comfortable at all.

 

5. Advantages: Medium-high consumption, cheap parts & they can be found almost everywhere.

    Disadvantages: Not much comfortable not bad though (Trunk is kinda small), it has a good and strong engine. It handle almost everything.

 

6. Advantages: Low consumption, cheap parts if you need to replace anything.

    Disadvantages: Not comfortable, not enough power (for abrupt streets), not enough spaces (if you have a family) in case of a road trip.

 

 

In general (based on the age of the cars(2001)), i'd say that most of them if not all aren't tubro so they have smaller consumption than newer models.

Except golf and peugeot 206 , the rest of the cars have engines that have or will have(soon enough) some problems. These two models have a medium to high consumption (this is based in the way that you drive) , but they have cheap parts which can be found everywhere. Peugeot has more power at its engine and it is slighter lighter than golf. Golf's aerodynamic is better and also driving experience is much better. Acceleration & top speed is almost the same.

 

I'd suggest golf but peugeot whould be bad either.

Posted

 

1. Advantages: Medium consumption, average price in parts.
    Disadvantages: Not much comfortable not bad either. It could have some problems since italian engines does not hold through years. (same goes for other engines too)
 
2. Advantages: Medium-high consumption, cheap parts & they can be found easy.
    Disadvantages: comfortable (for 4 passengers), it has a strong engine (pretty good at road - also it doesn't have many problems through years)
 
3. Advantages: Low consumption, cheap parts but it's not easy to find them since it didn't had much sales.
    Disadvantages: 50% comfortable,  not enough spaces. (Trunk is fine)
 
4. Avoid it in any case, its engine isn't good. Also, it's not comfortable at all.
 
5. Advantages: Medium-high consumption, cheap parts & they can be found almost everywhere.
    Disadvantages: Not much comfortable not bad though (Trunk is kinda small), it has a good and strong engine. It handle almost everything.
 
6. Advantages: Low consumption, cheap parts if you need to replace anything.
    Disadvantages: Not comfortable, not enough power (for abrupt streets), not enough spaces (if you have a family) in case of a road trip.
 
 
In general (based on the age of the cars(2001)), i'd say that most of them if not all aren't tubro so they have smaller consumption than newer models.
Except golf and peugeot 206 , the rest of the cars have engines that have or will have(soon enough) some problems. These two models have a medium to high consumption (this is based in the way that you drive) , but they have cheap parts which can be found everywhere. Peugeot has more power at its engine and it is slighter lighter than golf. Golf's aerodynamic is better and also driving experience is much better. Acceleration & top speed is almost the same.
 
I'd suggest golf but peugeot whould be bad either.

 

now this is what i call good answer :) I would agree on most of things u said.

Posted

now this is what i call good answer :) I would agree on most of things u said.

Feel free to ask anything else you might need .. (regarding cars :p)

Posted

Feel free to ask anything else you might need .. (regarding cars :P)

well im also thinking maybe about peugeot 206 cc (cabrio) , its a bit more expensive, but VERY nice looking for me :)

Posted

From your list i would pick only Golf.A while ago my brother recommended one of these cheap cars VW Corrado,audi coupe b3 or Audi a6,said fuel economy is great and has cheap parts but they are under 2001 year, but really good looking cars  specially Corrado :D

Posted

From your list i would pick only Golf.A while ago my brother recommended one of these cheap cars VW Corrado,audi coupe b3 or Audi a6,said fuel economy is great and has cheap parts but they are under 2001 year, but really good looking cars  specially Corrado :D

yea Corrado look awesome :) But now i am maybe thinking to co with Peugeot 206 cc Cabrio :) Duuno if any1 have some infos about them.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I have a highly customized Hi5 pack based on L2JMobius with a lot of features for performance and modern game design. Disclaimer: I do not run any public server, but I run a "private" server for a group of 10 friends and about 2000 AI bots that required me to do heavy modifications on core systems of the game.  So my opinion will obivously be biased towards L2JMobius.   What I can tell you though without bias is: Most of the features you are asking for are nowadays considered de-facto, don't pay money for them. TvT, offline mode, community boards, premiums, vote rewards are in most packs including the open source ones. So before you pay a thousand plus euro for a pack ask yourself what you are paying that money for, that open source packs don't have.   Also a lot of the "strong points" some old packs were made for are nowadays obsolete. L2JFree derived packs for example used to have a lot of GC optimizations (Trove library) which are not not maintained, but most importantly not needed cause Java has evolved a lot since then and the performance issues these tricks tried to solve back then, are currently solved by Java's JVM itself. So if someone tries to sell you packed / unpacked integers in special hashmap data structures and other such things know that they have really lost their value nowadays.    A lot of people are selling thin air, things that everyone has. "Quality geodata" being one of them. I mean what's "quality geodata" ? Has someone painted them by hand ? Hell there's an online tool for free in github that extracts quality geodata, I think Galagard made it ? In contrast I'll tell you without wanting to boast about it that I use 3D navmesh on my project because 2000 bots could not pathfind large distances on A* on geodata. As far as I know, L2JMobius has it in its subscription version too. So if I could do an acceptable transition to navmesh from geodata in a week alone, I would assume that a decent pack with dedicated developers could do it better and faster. Red flag if someone still tries to sell you geodata in 2026.   Multi-protocol support gives small value and is a high risk.   I would not go for multi-protocol support for a public server cause you are locking yourself to specific providers and the functionality they support. If you need to change (eg pricing issues), you will be locked to a handful of providers. And what are you really gaining from a new client on an old game version ? Better UI ? The engine is still the same, static targeting and menus.    Agentic AI will make old hard features easy to implement, and drop their money value. Pay for AI-proof value. And compared to what most insecure devs claim, its a very powerful tool that allows those who know how to use it to accelerate their development. So a lot of features that took in the past a lot of time and effort to be developed and were a reason to charge money, are becoming a commodity today. So think to: The thing I am paying money for right now, how easy will it be to implement in a year from now ? If for example you are paying money for a game launcher that Claude Code can generate in top 1 hour without issues, I think you are wasting money.    I want to emphasise this a lot. Software engineering is in a transition atm. Most things that were mediocre to implement, launchers, guards, CMS, are nowadays easy. Yet the dev community continues to market them as premium content. They are not, sooner or later, when everyone starts selling them, they will realize that they will have to offer value in more complex features.  Private or public ? Bottom line is that a private pack and 1000 euro wont get you a sucessful server. You're the one that make it or break it. There have been many sucessful servers both in private packs and public packs in the past. It's really on the hands of the beholder, not on the source. A pack that plays good is a good indicator to buy as Trance said, but I would disagree that it's not enough. A server owner is not a player. He's a business man and has to account for longevity, vendor lock-in, expandability, hidden costs,  amortization, price changes and many more. Don't pick a pack based on how it played only.    
    • You don’t even need to look for a ghost project. Just buy the files from a project you’ve personally tested or played. That’s a much better starting point.
    • TG Support: https://t.me/buyingproxysup | Channel: https://t.me/buyingproxycom Discord support: #buyingproxy | Server: Join the BuyingProxy Discord Server!  Create your free account here
    • You have to put deep inside your pocket for something like this, for sure 😄
    • Hello everyone, I'm looking for a High Five Java server pack for a long-term project. I'm not looking for free packs. I'm interested in purchasing a professional pack with full source code if it's worth the investment. My priorities are: Stable core Clean and well-structured source code Good geodata and AI Modern Community Board Offline Trade / Offline Craft Premium Account system Vote Reward system Auto Events (TvT, CTF, DM, etc.) HWID protection Auto Farm  Buffer / QoL systems Modern admin tools Good Olympiad & Seven Signs implementation Excellent instance support (Freya, Frintezza, Zaken, Beleth, etc.) A huge bonus would be: Multi-protocol support (High Five + newer clients such as Salvation/Classical clients) Full source code (no closed binaries) Some custom things over Elegia At the moment I'm considering packs like Sunrise and L2-Scripts, but I'd really like to hear opinions from people who have actually worked with them. If you've been running a serious High Five project, I'd appreciate your honest feedback: Which pack are you using? What are its strengths and weaknesses? Would you buy it again? Are there any better alternatives available today? I'm looking for real experience rather than advertisements. Thanks!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..