Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

the only l2j proffessional teams are l2scripts and l2jserver dude 

 

idk on what world you newbies are living but thats the only true

i ask if team from l2jreunion is unskilled cuz he say "thats mostly a tool for the most unskilled server owners"

Posted

i ask if team from l2jreunion is unskilled cuz he say "thats mostly a tool for the most unskilled server owners"

 

it is

Posted (edited)

it is

i don't think....anyway this is your opinion about this code and for l2jreunion team. i like and 2...if you dont like this code dont use...i use this code and i share it here...if you dont like dont use :)

Edited by nikosdevil20
Posted (edited)

Gods, nikos.. you talk as if we were dumb. We know what this code is for and what it does. We are just telling it's so called "shit-code" for "the most unskilled server owners".

 

Looks like you don't rly understand english or what we are trying to say. Server owner != pack 'developer' / owner.. - You miss the point. And so, even reunion has that code for those server owners.

 

If you want to balance classes, do it via skills.

Edited by SweeTs
Posted

The point is codes like that make little to no difference because these affect the server in a bad way. Heres an example, you recude the incoming damage from blunts to light armor, the result will be lower auto attack damage but exact same skill damage so the end result is if you have lets say an arcana mace which is a blunt this patch does nothing in order to reduce the damage of mages so its pointless. If you reduce lets say bow damage against robes than because of the archers rely on kiting and auto attack damage the archers will get destroyed with any mage while its considered a skill matchup in reality.

As for the forks, anyone who knows anything about the teams who work still or worked in the past on l2 emulators know that the only ones that should be considered good are l2j for its stability, support and constant updates, l2jfree even tho its private because its code quality and management and ofc some of the russian teams who dont rely on l2j based code but rather doing their own stuff from scratch.

Posted

Gods, nikos.. you talk as if we were dumb. We know what this code is for and what it does. We are just telling it's so called "shit-code" for "the most unskilled server owners".

 

Looks like you don't rly understand english or what we are trying to say. Server owner != pack 'developer' / owner.. - You miss the point. And so, even reunion has that code for those server owners.

 

If you want to balance classes, do it via skills.

example trickster vs doombringer. you can change the crazy damages from this config.example trickster vs mages classes. you can change too from this. anyway for me is very usefull. and i say again. the balance from 1server cant fixed only with this. you sure must change and fix the skills. but with this configs if you want some damages more help you for do it faster. this is only...

Posted

example trickster vs doombringer. you can change the crazy damages from this config.example trickster vs mages classes. you can change too from this. anyway for me is very usefull. and i say again. the balance from 1server cant fixed only with this. you sure must change and fix the skills. but with this configs if you want some damages more help you for do it faster. this is only...

 

You do realize that trickster is 1 class and your config screws around with every single class that uses a bow(because of how l2j implement the weapon types especially frozen which is the worst pack in history) right? You proove with this comment that any server you make or involved with is crap if thats usefull for you instead of properly balancing the damage via class templates and skills.

 

Shares like these should be junked even deleted instantly for the sake of less crap l2j servers.

Posted (edited)

Coded with feet, that's for sure. You can reduce code from Formulas.java to few lines (less than 10 overall). And your code is checking each type of weapon, each type of armor, and check 10+ times L2PcInstance, skill null, etc...

 

Ask to L2JReunion to learn "if / else if" at least, it exists since a while. And eventually parameterized Enum, see L2J CrystalType to get an overview of what I'm talking about.

 

And use 

code tag
Edited by Tryskell
Posted

Coded with feet, that's for sure. You can reduce code from Formulas.java to few lines (less than 10 overall). And your code is checking each type of weapon, each type of armor, and check 10+ times L2PcInstance, skill null, etc...

 

Ask to L2JReunion to learn "if / else if" at least, it exists since a while. And eventually parameterized Enum, see L2J CrystalType to get an overview of what I'm talking about.

 

In L2Frozen u can wear light/heavy/Robe simultaneously, so your argument is invalid sir.

Posted (edited)

In L2Frozen u can wear light/heavy/Robe simultaneously, so your argument is invalid sir.

Except if you're considered to have more than one chest, sir, your argument is invalid. As you can see it retrieves the chest armor type.

 

Good day, sir.

Edited by Tryskell
Posted

Except if you're considered to have more than one chest, sir, your argument is invalid. As you can see it retrieves the chest armor type.

 

Good day, sir.

 

 

Seems like you missed my ironic tone

Posted (edited)

For one time L2JFrozen can't be broken on one point, don't throw a stone ^^. No, I understand and abuse of irony and sarcasm.

 

They got enough troubles with their data system migration...

Edited by Tryskell
Posted

For one time L2JFrozen can't be broken on one point, don't throw a stone ^^. No, I understand and abuse of irony and sarcasm.

 

They got enough troubles with their data system migration...

 

 

their memory management is excellent tho

 

for (L2PcInstance player : L2World.getInstance().getAllPlayers)

{

     player.blablabla

     player = null;

}

Posted

They inherit from Scoria, and Scoria is the Devil :D. Like many russians projects.

 

People can say L2J is shitty and unstable, but that's less and less the case. Consider to read quests on a L2P to get some facepalmes.

Posted (edited)

They inherit from Scoria, and Scoria is the Devil :D. Like many russians projects.

 

People can say L2J is shitty and unstable, but that's less and less the case. Consider to read quests on a L2P to get some facepalmes.

 

Actually its more and more the case, guess why they had to increase the minimum memory required to 1g when the pack couldnt even load properly with less and not because of so much stuff beeing in it, just bad coding in general, but thats the case with it since ages so nobody cares especially when l2j is dead.  :)

Edited by Intrepid

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • Kroma — Lineage II Interlude on LU4 Client (Latest client)   I'm selling this project. Here's what it actually is and what's been done.   This is a few months of work, most of it on the reverse engineering side. I built it because I wanted to open my own Interlude server on it. That's not happening any more — I've moved on to other projects and don't have the free time left to take it the rest of the way, so I'd rather it went to someone who will.   The idea was to take the modern LU4 client and make it run an Interlude version of the game. Not a reskin of an old client — the actual current client, playing Interlude, against a server I wrote. That's what this is, and it works end to end: the client boots, authenticates, connects, and you play. There are six repositories. Roughly, it splits into three kinds of work: reverse engineering the client, writing the server, and rebuilding the client's own content so it matches Interlude.   Fully reverse engineered   The client's protocol wasn't documented anywhere, so it was derived from scratch off real traffic. I built a sniffer (bypassing anticheat packet encryption) that drops into the client's binaries folder and dumps live traffic to disk, then a separate Java toolchain that decrypts those captures — login and game traffic, both directions. Everything the server knows about the protocol came out of that loop: capture, decrypt, read, implement, test against the real client.   On top of that there's a native x64 hook and injector in C++. It points the client at your own servers and handles its authentication and session layer, plus a few client-side stability fixes that were needed to keep it from falling over once it's talking to something that isn't the official backend. The hooking is pattern-based rather than address-based, so a client patch doesn't automatically break it.   The reverse-engineering notes are in the repos — the patterns, the disassembly, the decompiled functions, what each one does and why it's hooked. That documentation is a real part of what's being sold; it's the difference between inheriting a working system and inheriting a black box.   The server   Interlude ruleset, aCis lineage, but substantially rewritten and extended to speak the LU5 client's protocol with modern features like Party matching, Offline shops or Mailbox. The geodata has been updated according to some layout changes in LU4 cities. There's also a separate login server handling the client's auth flow.   Customized client to adapt to Interlude   This is the part people underestimate. The retail client ships retail content — retail NPCs, retail items, retail zones, retail UI. All of that had to be reshaped. The whole client-side pipeline is scripted: extract the retail PAKs, apply every edit from data files, rebuild, drop the result back into the game folder. 23 purpose-built C# tools, ~6,700 lines, organised into three pipelines that are guaranteed not to write over each other. There's a documented checklist for regenerating everything from scratch when a new patch drops. The important thing is that none of it is hand-editing. Every change is a line in a data file. When the client updates, you re-run the scripts instead of redoing the work from memory.   All NPC / item / drop lists updated according to Interlude   The client's own data tables were rewritten from the real Interlude client data files — `npcname-e`, `itemname-e`, `skillname-e`, `systemmsg-e`, `npcgrp`. That means roughly 6,470 NPC and skill name/title updates and about 4,000 Drops/Spoils rows written directly into the client's `NPCDataTable` and `SkillTable`, so the client shows Interlude names, Interlude item text, Interlude system messages, and Interlude drop and spoil lists. There are also custom NPC rows on top of that, plus 304 game action rewrites.   Opened the catacombs   In the LU4 client the catacombs and necropolises are unusable — flooded, unlit, and with holes in the geometry. All three were fixed: Water removed. Water exclusion volumes were placed over all 12 of them: Rifts, Apostate, Patriots, Devotion, Dark Omens, Heretics, Pilgrims, Saints, Worship, Martyr, Forbidden Path and Witch. This was more involved than it sounds — the volumes' scale is ignored at runtime, so the tool picks the best-fitting native template per hole, and nearby lakes and rivers are separate water bodies that have to be excluded individually or you get leftover water borders. Lights added. About 28,900 light definitions imported into the client's level files. Missing walls fixed. Mesh actors replaced and spawned to close the gaps in the geometry.   Removed the modern "slop" features from the UI   The LU4 client is full of things that have no business in an Interlude server, and most of them are wired into the UI. Those are stripped out: The assistant manager — the auto-hunt / auto-play slot on the XP bar Vitality*and the XP lock button The fatigue system — updated the format to a regular VIP format The in-game browser and in-game radio buttons The "Learn Skill" tab in the player skills window Removals are scripted by path, so they survive a client patch and are trivially reversible if a buyer wants any of them back.   Reworked the UI toward an actual Lineage II feel   The original LU4 UI looks AI-generated. It doesn't feel like Lineage II. A good part of it has been reworked toward the classic look — the menu button row rebuilt as a wrapping layout with a proper background, the self status and target windows cleaned up, and 590 asset field edits covering textures, positions, colours, text and compiled Blueprint literals.   This part is not finished, and I want to be straight about that But the tooling to continue it is all there, and it's the good kind of tooling: you can target any widget property in any UI asset by dotted path, remove widgets by path without knowing their auto-generated slot names, and edit text that's dynamically bound through Blueprint bytecode rather than stored as a plain property. Continuing the UI work means adding lines to a data file, not reverse engineering anything new.   Other client-side work   A custom login scene, built in a real Unreal Engine project that's included Interlude music restored, plus ambient sound work (cities only for now) Custom splash and branding   What's included   All six git repositories, the Unreal Engine project and its custom assets, all the tooling — injector, hook, sniffer, decryptor, asset editor — every data set including geodata, XML, HTML and the SQL schema, the build and repack scripts, and the per-repo technical documentation including the reverse-engineering notes.   Happy to answer questions or show it running.   Gallery
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..