Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

fail project is fail

ok zak,you speak?

every week with new server?

ok :) we are FAIL.yes !!

 

anyway....

 

 

 

I Would like To Inform you that we are Under Developin of a BIG update!

But that we do is not Easy and we need Some time To Finish it!

The SVN not Updated For A Long Time , But i am Sure that those who are preparing you will surprised :)

 

 

I can not tell you for sure When We Fnish , but for everything you Want The L2jDario team It's Here For You !

Pm Us Or Do A Report !

 

 

Yours,

L2jDario Team

Posted

yes i am talking dear failer, the only server i had was gaming-style and was online for 6 months :)

good luck man , hope u don't fail like others :(

lol its already failed
Posted

A guy shared sources of this project and they seemed that were based on equal,yea really.

 

But he says so in the first post:

 

Review:

Based on L2JEqual Revision: 323

Posted

A guy shared sources of this project and they seemed that were based on equal,yea really.

i am this guy,  he only knows how to add configs. He says interlude skills are working 100%, you can open a beta server with this pack i shared and test salvation/gate chant and others, like aegis stance it still increases p def, cool?

 

PS: he is still selling shared things, why don't you lock it?

Posted

zake you test the preco version......i have the updates and all skills work 100% they cant give oen preco and this preco have all the fixes so why you buy the real pack if the preco is perfect ?

bot or sth?

1) pack is perfect?

2) the updates are shared in mxc

3) buy a shared sh*t?

Posted

zake you test the preco version......i have the updates and all skills work 100% they cant give oen preco and this preco have all the fixes so why you buy the real pack if the preco is perfect ?

Are you a bot or you bought it and realised that it is junk?
Posted

why you deal with zake,

i already told you that the pack will changed 100% , we do a new update and we change everything i don't told you that the project it's perfect but is better from others with 300 euro (This Is EPIC) !

w/e i will inform you about the update when we done it

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • try this one instead. The one he shared affects every single NPC/player character in the game, the one I posted only affects player characters  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UtccbD9e50x3WEnQBab2PTZnBHwpcGYM/view?usp=sharing or perhaps i misunderstood; if you could please post a full explanation of the problem you're having with the files, unfortunately i think whatever you're using to translate to english is a bit bad
    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..