Jump to content
  • 0

Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

You may tell us chronicle?

Obviously interlude ;)

 

Man, you could try l2jfrozen, not many bugs, lot of customs. IF you are searching for interlude. If you need another chronicle, just reply.

  • 0
Posted

Hmm for interlude, i was thinking of L2j but it has some bugs too.

Ok then,

If you wanna a clean code project,I would suggest you to take the last rev o aCis,

Now if you want it for a custom server and almost done(if I can say that),take l2jfrozen.

  • 0
Posted

I agree with Fanky, but you will get confused with l2jaCis, skills aren't ready, so it's not a 'good' option for a live server. Now, if you have the knownledge to customize + protect + fix your own pack, just take latest rev of l2j, and start working.

  • 0
Posted

I agree with Fanky, but you will get confused with l2jaCis, skills aren't ready, so it's not a 'good' option for a live server. Now, if you have the knownledge to customize + protect + fix your own pack, just take latest rev of l2j, and start working.

 

This is what i thought too.. so i believe L2j has less bugs than l2jfrozen right?

  • 0
Posted

Well yes I guess,l2j developers(Interlude) stopped develop the IL source from 2006,so yes.

L2jfrozen its active & still alive project plus they got their support forum in order to report bugs.

  • 0
Posted

Hello, I would like to ask which is the best pack, i mean which pack has the least bugs? I Need a pack without many features, but WITHOUT BUGS! Please tell me your opinion, thanks.

 

There is not a good pack for "bugs"!!!

 

There are good packs on skills reworking, quest, formula.... balance etc.

 

Well you can try L2JEmu or L2J for freya... but if you speaking about Interlude... i cannot help you.

  • 0
Posted

This is what i thought too.. so i believe L2j has less bugs than l2jfrozen right?

No, l2jfrozen has less bugs and lots of things have been 'reworked', but l2j is the best(l2jfree was, but it is dead) project to base on, in order to make your own bugless and 'as you want it to be' pack. But it has looooots of bugs and many programs like l2phx(i mean actions that you can do with it), aren't fixed in any way possible. So try l2jfrozen.

  • 0
Posted

don't know what to say guys..

I worked with l2jfrozen and still working..now i have a LOT of bugs..java errors...error after error..

 

First Rev's were preety good (no crush..no errors) Now is full of errors :| don't understand why..

  • 0
Posted

don't know what to say guys..

I worked with l2jfrozen and still working..now i have a LOT of bugs..java errors...error after error..

 

First Rev's were preety good (no crush..no errors) Now is full of errors :| don't understand why..

nowdays most errors on console [GS] are from UNCLOSEDCONNECTION i think .. i see that problem being reported continuesly, but i don't know why, i don't have that problem since rev. 601 :) so problem comes from people who uses pack, not from pack .. I THINK .. but about some other problems, what happens is almost the same, always people reporting things that are working, but not for them because have edited something wrong on config or core ... just check your whole config and they see, btw .. aCis is good, even better than L2JFrozen, the problem is that is not finished yet, so is a bit unstable :(

  • 0
Posted

Hey, stop with that "aCis is unstable" thing :P. It's perfectly stable. It can't be currently be used as live, but it's stable.

 

About Frozen, they made an experiment using boneCP instead the current C3P0 pooler than any project normally have. And for that, you can say it's experimental and non-live anymore, as aCis became non-live around rev 40 (but me I announced it wasn't non-live, when you, you think Frozen is still live-able).

 

I won't say aCis is better than Frozen. Frozen uses Scoria as base, they got a lot of stuff already made but inherits Scoria problems (as any pack have their own problems), so they have to correct inherent L2J problems, Scoria ones and avoiding to add own problems.

 

Both projects got a different public (light vs custom), goal (propose a clean base for any server type vs propose a end-based server) && conception ideals (refactor entirely parts of code will fix bugs vs fixing bugs without refactors). Both projects got PROS and CONS and different types of visitors.

 

A discussion with Shyla (on my forum 2 months ago, when aCis just born) ended with the fact my and his project just couldn't merge, because my PoV of what a server must offer is different of its PoV.

 

I stop with semi-offtopic, even if it's always interesting to know what happens in background :).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..