Sighed

Actually you can but it will lag as hell, and make your hard drive scream.

Cached works with L2Server in the shared memory about shared memory read THIS, as it name says, its a cache for better understanding read THIS it will give you some idea about it. So mostly the CacheD stores the data for future use for the L2Server, and acts like a bridge between L2Server and SQL Server, executing all the queries and stored procedures. So when you send a packet directly to the CacheD is made available in-game, opposed to when you write it directly inside the database which doesn't make it available in-game cause the CacheD didn't loaded it in memory. Also there is an old C4 dupe if i remember that occurs here due to a duplicated stack of items, one from CacheD and other from L2Server but that is a different story. About formats of the packets, you can find them in the CacheD functions, i will check in my cloud and see if i can find a library that will work for you. P.S: Mac correct me if im wrong, confused or missed something :P

Most people around think that it will save them from 5Gbps UDP flood, doesn't matter, it only stabilizes the server during an attack that is all. Anyway AdvExt64 still wins if we talk about chronicle accuracy, quests and siege-able manors.

4GB ? I thought the 4 GB modules were cheap. On a laptop ? Are you trolling ? Its this a joke or something ?

Its just a packer, nothing has to do with trojan. Jeez look in IDA, there are plenty of false positives in the internet, lol even keygen's are taken as malware, but that is just to avoid people using them lol.

Good job mate. Did you thought about contacting zodiark0 and taking over his project ?

Why not fixing the GeoData ?

Also using FreeTDS on a linux based webserver will make the connection to the SQL Server database.

It depends what you like, Vanganth has for example anti-bot and dualbox limit system, and a lot of customization engines which can make the interlude server really different from others, the point is nobody use that. By other hand AdvExt64 is more complete in retail aspect, quests and 2 siege able clan halls, like the wild beast reserve or the hot springs, nobody cares much about them, but well those are just examples.

You might have a wrong setup or something, but without any error log, we cannot tell you magically the solution.

What kind of e-war ? Its just the truth and my opinion, not my problem. You wanted to join and script quests for IlExt, i replied you and never got answer from you so it means you have no interest and no skills, period.

Yeah, but natively no and most new people will start trying with PTS files, so you are giving misinformation. How did you got the develeoper title i can't understand it.

For what i know for ban characters there is a table in lin2db database.

Please, do it yourself and much better.

Stazis used to have a website selling Geo's also i think he worked long time ago as part of nextdev.

Its supposed to be a Log Parser, which we already have a lot.

Beacause its kinda a weird that anyone is making anything and not asking for money. Anyway i will check it out.

And from where you ripped the source code for parsing the logs ?

They are AdvExt scripts so mostly anything in there won't work beacause you need an extender that will support it.

I know but we were talking about online and offline scripts, not about auto-registration :D I was talking about the hAuthD script for online and offline status, beacause its the Auth that most people use. The only thing that needs to be removed in that SP for deactivating the Auto-Registration feature is exec ap_AutoReg @account thats all, anyway extending other Auth like C4 there is a posibility of adding such feature.

GF doesn't support it as well, it was some crap added by some of the previous owners of the files, not NcSoft, its just a stored procedure that has to me modified in order to disable that function. But we are talking about online status and players, what has to do that with ?

The hAuthD script works with any hAuthD version, and for what i know any server works with hAuthD.

Why don't use the hAuthD system ? it works fine, and doesn't need to connect to MSSQL.

You say its so vulnerable for using an Application created by Vanganth itself, instead of bragging that is vulnerable, can you give an example ? The same way i can tell that your server is vulnerable without giving a reason.

You forgot to add in the ssq, the setup of the seal period //ssq seal_period command.