Jump to content

eressea

Legendary Member
  • Posts

    534
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8
  • Feedback

    0%

Everything posted by eressea

  1. Is there any advantage of old mxc ext 1.07 compared to my extender? Missing feature?
  2. When it's Linux-based, it will use iptables, that's fact. There are some other options that are used commonly, for example pfSense which is FreeBSD-based. Also Cisco has it's own operating system (IOS, don't confuse with iOS)
  3. Unless you have some special hardware like Radware DefensePro I fear you won't find any free service for it; or at least service you can count on Depends on how many rules do you use, whether you use conntracking (and whether you use it the right way - then it can help much because you check only SYN packets and pass through the rest) etc... There's also lot of additional settings that might interest you like SYN cookies. Szaka: If I were you, I'd start with iptables and try to find something better only if iptables won't do it EDIT: In case you need to check whether IP belongs to some set, don't set rules for all those addresses. Use ipset http://ipset.netfilter.org/
  4. What OS do you have there? If Linux, how about trying some filtering (rate limits etc) with iptables?
  5. Can't test it properly so it's just a try http://download.l2shrine.com/nwindow-il-unichat.dll Use instead of default interlude nwindow.dll...
  6. Hi there, does anyone know how drop_time in fieldcycle.txt should work? In leaked Gracia Final when no change in points occurs within that time, it goes one step down. This is called from timer (that runs every 30 seconds) and it doesn't update last point change time, so it basically goes one step down every 30 seconds! Is this correct behavior or is it bug? Should last point change time get updated when it goes one step down (thus going one step down every 3 days) or not (thus going one step down every 30 seconds)? Thanks!
  7. I'm not sure about it but I don't like the ID 1337001 - try something lower (range 32000-33000 should be available and ok)
  8. You need serial key for cached - search for CacheDSNGen.exe
  9. what if you create new bat file with javaw -jar libs/editor.jar ?
  10. How does the bat file look like?
  11. Do you have updater.jar file? How do you run the editor? Via bat file? Do you have correct classpath?
  12. Database from l2server_l2off_gracia_final_83 should work fine
  13. Fixed few security flaws https://bitbucket.org/l2shrine/extender-public/commits/dc3c2a0bc250ed50d416df1d57a59447fda31ba1 If you're using MyExt64, update as soon as possible!
  14. Still around 850 boxes daily with offline traders / around 500 real people playing in last week or so
  15. I fear there will be more changed packets - but yes, it's possible to extend it
  16. I think they probably used different server version, maybe something C4-based
  17. Seems like some packet has different structure and some ID in that packet is shifted by one byte - that's the reason it multiplies it by 256 I fear you'll need to extend the premium server somehow
  18. Bit offtopic but it's already in spam section, so nvm :)) Shrine is fine, now we have "easter" event, how about your projects? Planning something?
  19. Did you try this https://forum.zone-game.info/showthread.php?t=27179 ?
  20. Lol, these are (were) the real hackers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Kernighan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Ritchie https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_S._Raymond https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_R._Bourne
  21. Then you should try to fix the problem, not to find more difficult way around
  22. Do you have it encoded in UTF-16LE?
  23. You don't need server-side support for this, you can get online numbers from lin2db.dbo.user_count table
  24. Hi, I don't have any centralized build numbers, only git commits - but I can't use them, because they would be 1 commit off. Maybe build date would be fine... Auto announcement - useful feature, I'll think about it Drop issue - that will be client related because there's no difference between these packets all over protocol 83, 87, 148 and 152... I use protocol 152 and don't have any issue with items on the ground.
×
×
  • Create New...

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock