Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

rofl. l2jfrozen, l2jaCis, l2jrok, l2jteon, l2jbrasil. i know most of them will fail, but some will succed.

 

haha they will success but with less then 20 online... as I know any one is crying me "Fix my project all time crashing"

and when I ask "Project?" they tell me that names.... sorry but none of that projects are not recommended for live server!

Posted

thx to all for good words and i wait you to help me in the project ;) thx again

 

Dude why most of projects are dead?

Becouse the admins are askin random peoples that you have see to make shares with stoled credits... to "help" them...

And that random peoples are just making the game worst... Next thing you know is a pack bugged and not stable... Same thing happen in l2teon...

My advice is to be careful who are you adding at your project

Posted

Dude why most of projects are dead?

Becouse the admins are askin random peoples that you have see to make shares with stoled credits... to "help" them...

And that random peoples are just making the game worst... Next thing you know is a pack bugged and not stable... Same thing happen in l2teon...

My advice is to be careful who are you adding at your project

 

i want people to help me in testing no add java change ;) i will be alone in this project ;) i just need testers

Posted

i want people to help me in testing no add java change ;) i will be alone in this project ;) i just need testers

 

Have patience.. A successful project is not making for 1 week... :)

1 Tip. fix the most known bugs and make some custom mods couse you know only pvp servers are using interlude java based engine...

Belive me make much custom and you will grow up really fast!

Posted

Have patience.. A successful project is not making for 1 week... :)

1 Tip. fix the most known bugs and make some custom mods couse you know only pvp servers are using interlude java based engine...

Belive me make much custom and you will grow up really fast!

oh sh1t.

This plan have all il projects and that's why are shitty coded and bugged.

Good tip >.<

Posted

oh sh1t.

This plan have all il projects and that's why are shitty coded and bugged.

Good tip >.<

 

lol??? He have decided to make this project and this mean that he must got skills...

Not any one can make good coded customs thats true... But if he code them correctly he will not fail.

Posted

lol??? He have decided to make this project and this mean that he must got skills...

Not any one can make good coded customs thats true... But if he code them correctly he will not fail.

IL client need to be corrected and you want to put from the begin custom mods?

Just use your brain and see what happening to all il projects.

 

Posted

Fuck what THEY say, Do your Job.

Try to get better day by day, Improve your skills and make your Project good.

Remember that Haters gonna hate.

Good luck my friend.

 

To others: Instead of applauding the dude that's trying to give something for you, With spending his free time working on an Open source project, You talk sh1t about him, Gratz.

Posted

Instead of applauding the dude that's trying to give something for you, With spending his free time working on an Open source project, You talk sh1t about him, Gratz.

Thats the whole point of haters,when they will find someting that is not working...you will be fullied of swears again .

The public development sux so hard because you will not ever do what they want.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..