StinkyMadness Posted September 23, 2019 Share Posted September 23, 2019 (edited) Hello again Cheaters i rework and redesign an already shared code of my friend @melron (Official code : HERE) - Using multi-word search. - Cleanup parts of the code. - Code not include part of "item.getIcon()" you can find many shared ways to get icon for each item. Updates: - Add idea/part of the code of @Creamy G Colin - Add check of empty seach (was throwing error on GS console) - Add info if its Quest Item Coded for aCis 385 revision Code : Here Edited July 7, 2021 by StinkyMadness 4 7 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wongerlt Posted September 27, 2019 Share Posted September 27, 2019 i think multi word search must be like: String[] parts = search.toLowerCase().split(" "); for (Item item : ItemData.getInstance().getTemplates()){ boolean add = false; for (String part : parts) { if (item.getName().toLowerCase().contains(part)){ add = true; }else{ add = false; break; } } } if(add) items.add(item); Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkyMadness Posted September 27, 2019 Author Share Posted September 27, 2019 5 hours ago, wongerlt said: i think multi word search must be like: ... Why my way its not working ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioy Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 15 hours ago, wongerlt said: i think multi word search must be like: String[] parts = search.toLowerCase().split(" "); for (Item item : ItemData.getInstance().getTemplates()){ boolean add = false; for (String part : parts) { if (item.getName().toLowerCase().contains(part)){ add = true; }else{ add = false; break; } } } if(add) items.add(item); GTFO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wongerlt Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 19 hours ago, StinkyMadness said: Why my way its not working ? if i try search example "Bow Draconic" or "Drac Bow" then not working. with me code it will work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StinkyMadness Posted September 28, 2019 Author Share Posted September 28, 2019 38 minutes ago, wongerlt said: if i try search example "Bow Draconic" or "Drac Bow" then not working. with me code it will work You have no reason to search "Drac Bow" -.- also without testing as i read your part with "Drac Bow" it will show you and "Draconic Armor" too.. right me if i'm wrong.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wongerlt Posted September 28, 2019 Share Posted September 28, 2019 7 minutes ago, StinkyMadness said: You have no reason to search "Drac Bow" -.- also without testing as i read your part with "Drac Bow" it will show you and "Draconic Armor" too.. right me if i'm wrong.. in item name must include all search words so draconic armor not show. its good if u not remember part of item name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creamy G Colin Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 (edited) On 9/27/2019 at 7:18 PM, wongerlt said: i think multi word search must be like: String[] parts = search.toLowerCase().split(" "); for (Item item : ItemData.getInstance().getTemplates()){ boolean add = false; for (String part : parts) { if (item.getName().toLowerCase().contains(part)){ add = true; }else{ add = false; break; } } } if(add) items.add(item); I think you didnt even test this code... isnt working at all. Here is one that could work. package test; import java.util.Arrays; import java.util.stream.Collectors; public class workspace { public static void main(String[] args) { final String[] items = new String[] { "Draconic Bow", "Draconic Bow - Focus", "Arcana Mace", "Arcana Mace - Acumen" }; final String search = "drac bo"; Arrays.asList(items).stream().filter(names -> matches(names.toLowerCase(), search.toLowerCase())).collect(Collectors.toList()).forEach(System.out::println); } public static boolean matches(String string1, String string2) { for (char c : string2.toCharArray()) if (string1.indexOf(c) == -1) return false; return true; } } and if you need extra debug mode... take the lines you need and create it Edited September 29, 2019 by Creamy G Colin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLO Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 It's a good share and concept in general but then again........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creamy G Colin Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 6 minutes ago, GLO said: It's a good share and concept in general but then again........ This is > interlude client.... and if not, requires client modification.. so? .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLO Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 5 minutes ago, Creamy G Colin said: This is > interlude client.... and if not, requires client modification.. so? .... Please refer to my article in general discussion, Mimesis and Necrophilia. Quote Interlude, like fecal matter, is beneath us. Obsessing over your feces and talking/playing/prodding/poking your stool is not only extremely unhealthy and abnormal but it serves as a complete halt to progress. Normal men bury it in a hole and keep on going. Or flush it down your toilet. Furthermore this can be related to the dead. It is not healthy or normal to keep a corpse in your bathtub and put makeup on it and dress it up just so you can take a selfie on instagram tagging the faux morticians page. This is what Interlude devs are essentially doing. Working on interlude is a sign of depression. Forever living in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creamy G Colin Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, GLO said: Please refer to my article in general discussion, Mimesis and Necrophilia. What a brain. You came here to judge interlude users/devs? rly nigga? in a share about interlude Server Side? rly nigga? I could say the exact same thing about lineage 2 client devs. What's up? Edited September 29, 2019 by Creamy G Colin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLO Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 11 minutes ago, Creamy G Colin said: What a brain. You came here to judge interlude users/devs? rly nigga? in a share about interlude Server Side? rly nigga? I could say the exact same thing about lineage 2 client devs. What's up? Good developers should focus on inventing the car not improving the carriage. Max potential of interlude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creamy G Colin Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 (edited) 9 minutes ago, GLO said: Good developers should focus on inventing the car not improving the carriage. Max potential of interlude Alright Mr smart guy. i wont answer to you anymore since im not even working on l2 anymore... i just rly wanna see what @Tryskell have to say about your thoughts Edited September 29, 2019 by Creamy G Colin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tryskell Posted September 29, 2019 Share Posted September 29, 2019 47 minutes ago, Creamy G Colin said: Alright Mr smart guy. i wont answer to you anymore since im not even working on l2 anymore... i just rly wanna see what @Tryskell have to say about your thoughts It's pointless to speak with that sort of people. Whatever people like GLO can say, Classic isn't Interlude. I could say developping on Classic is totally pointless, because you lost your time running after something which always change of shape. Simply wait 5-10 Classic chronicles to see how clunky your Classic L2J project will be, with half missing functionalities. See L2J to understand what I mean, they simply had to stop on High Five to take a breath. GoD simply changed all quests. Latest Lineage 2 chronicle also deleted all GoD quests with a 30min 1-85. People were saying Interlude was dead with Classic, but the fact is there is still more Interlude shares/servers than Classic. More time passes by, less accurate and more shitty your Classic server will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now