Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Tons of thanks An4rchy I just tested it and its working on last acis free rev, with the fixes of Rootware thanks too dude.

Np, but what fixes? This one is tested and it works fine without any changes.

 

Edit: Ok you are talking about the section printing, yeah it's a change in aCis latest revs I guess.

Edited by An4rchy
Posted

Np, but what fixes? This one is tested and it works fine without any changes.

Im using the free acis so it might be a little bit outdated from the paid one.

I changed Collection<L2PcInstance> pls = L2World.getInstance().getPlayers(); to Collection<L2PcInstance> pls = L2World.getInstance().getAllPlayers().values();

and this StringUtil.printSection("Vote Reward"); to Util.printSection("Vote Reward");

Posted

Np, but what fixes? This one is tested and it works fine without any changes.

 

Edit: Ok you are talking about the section printing, yeah it's a change in aCis latest revs I guess.

 

Man told about my downgrading of your code up to oldest aCis style.  :troll:

Posted (edited)

Man told about my downgrading of your code up to oldest aCis style.  :troll:

 

Hehe dem downgradez :D

Edited by An4rchy
Posted

finally after a year hopzone vote reward is free jajajaja

gj

The old Anarchy's code for hop/top just need few lines..

I use Anarchy's old code, perfectly..

Posted

Re-sharing this was fvcking awesome idea! Thanks for doing that, people need a vote reward that actually works :)

Posted

The old Anarchy's code for hop/top just need few lines..

I use Anarchy's old code, perfectly..

 

Yeah, you just need to change few lines in getVotes() method. But I would use that one if I were you, it's coded in a better. (Not that it will make a difference to be honest ;p)

 

 

 

if i set 5minutes delay its announce 3sites same time xD

 

I don't see any problem with that..

Posted

Yeah, you just need to change few lines in getVotes() method. But I would use that one if I were you, it's coded in a better. (Not that it will make a difference to be honest ;p)

 

 

 

 

I don't see any problem with that..

 

for example i set 5minutes delay for top hop y networks , but after 5 minutes its spam chat whit +3 announces same time (top hop net).

Posted

for example i set 5minutes delay for top hop y networks , but after 5 minutes its spam chat whit +3 announces same time (top hop net).

you mean 3 for top,3 for hop and 3 for network at the same time?

Posted

Lol, that's not spam, that's informing the players about the server's votes.. It all happens together for all 3 sites because you set 5 minutes for all 3 sites. That's not considered as 'spam' if you ask me and it should happen that way.

Posted

Yes, if we make it announce 5minutes on all sites, its announce each 5 minutes all sites.

 

I think is better make a rework to 1 delay announce for all sites, not 3 for separated.

 

Then its announce votes each 5minutes(configured), for each site. 5minutes announce topzone votes, after 5 minutes announce hopzone votes, after 5 minutes announce networks votes.

Posted

Yes, if we make it announce 5minutes on all sites, its announce each 5 minutes all sites.

 

I think is better make a rework to 1 delay announce for all sites, not 3 for separated.

 

Then its announce votes each 5minutes(configured), for each site. 5minutes announce topzone votes, after 5 minutes announce hopzone votes, after 5 minutes announce networks votes.

 

Well, feel free to send me your version and I will update my main topic :D

It's not hard to do what you asked, some minor modifications.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • new synchronized movement with neoengine obstacle correction I reported bugs to you and you completely ignored me because of my nationality. Yes, you were arrogant towards me. I sent you many questions on your forum and you didn't even thank me or say anything about it. I stopped using your updates a long time ago and focused on fixing my own aCis because you intentionally break the code. Just buy versions 401 to 409; you intentionally broke a lot of things for "IDIOTS" to buy from you. Anyway, our conversation ends here. Good luck with renaming and organizing; that probably makes you more money than fixing the basics.
    • I'm on that same situation, but hey after almost 3600 commits it's almost playable! 😛
    • Probably due to poor choice of container handling items, you should test other types.   If it's not due to container, it can be whatever method impacting inventory, such as sort/filter/integrity checks. Bad synchronization can also grealty impact performance.   Another thing to check is about packet sending, you should use L2PHX to explore what is actually sent.
    • how do I make it so that you only deal damage to a mob if you have the right items equipped, like jewels, belt, underwear, bracelet, so if you don't have one of those items equipped, you don't deal any damage to the mob thanks
    • I always welcome bug reports and never ban ppl - until proven leaker - not sure where the "arrogant" part comes from, I would like to know what exactly let you think that (quote me please, and not 12y old quotes as the other frog meme dude). I request bug reports to be properly detailed, otherwise it's a waste of time. Other than that, I don't see where I have been arrogant. I got proper discussions with many ppl, not sure why you wouldn't be one of them.   I got 76 bug reports in my list (21 on forums, 55 on gitlab).   I have a single bug report regarding lvl 4 clan quest, which has to be tested since it's not even clear about what is supposed to be broken. Seven Signs was never reworked and is basically L2J based (we got a rework branch to test/commit with reworked AIs). Geoengine got no specific issues (at my knowledge), pathfinding was reworked lately to be way more performant, and I still try to improve performance using some pool system. Movement was partially fixed in latest 410, and probably will get another rework soon (notably reverting to the task wallclock).   "I" surely didn't spend 12y over geoengine - Hasha cared about geoengine during rev 334 / 354 / 390 / 395 and 397. It is solely his work, and always tagged as it. He was rewarded with money for his work, and almost a decade of aCis access.   aCis is a community work, things tagged with Tryskell is my work, the leftover is someone else work. 22 ppl worked as developers in this project over 14 years.   I would gladly accept whatever list of fixes/reports you have to share. You will even be rewarded (you probably know about cookie system), as anyone else sharing bug report or fixes.   My main concerns lately is the lack of decent L2OFF IL data, it is my main bottleneck actually. If you're aware about decent L2OFF data to parse, let me know.   Eventually reach me over Discord to speak, I don't want to continue the offtopic over that help request.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..

AdBlock Extension Detected!

Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our members.

Please disable AdBlock browser extension first, to be able to use our community.

I've Disabled AdBlock