Jump to content

[Share]Unique Interlude Event [CaptureThem] !!!!!!!!!!!!


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok guys this is my second event let me explain you what it does with some images:

First of all the admin starts the event with the command //capture

Cgv2jqq.png

 

Then this appears

VflcR1q.png

 

after you register with the .join command these will appear

1) a confirmationjpG8Clq.png

 

2)and a html explainning the event to the player

prkE95T.png

 

Then  before teleportation a html appears telling him that he will get ported and he is noblessed so he won't loose buffs in the event

khTETCo.png

 

Then the player is ported in coliseum with blue color name changed tittle

wcG5eL8.jpg

 

Each time the player dies he is ported back in coliseum and gets nobless

When a player kills another player gets 1 point while killing a flag gives you 10 points at the end the player with the most points is rewarded(rewards and time of the events in configs).

After the event is finished any non killed flags are removed players ported back in giran with their normall color and the custom tittle is removed

 

the code link is bellow!

Leave a nice comment please :P

Both core and dp are included:

http://www.4shared.com/rar/peINtkSZ/CaptureEvent.html?

 

Ps1 thanks to elfo for the help!

Ps2 report any bugs so i can fix them!

:not bad: :not bad:

Posted

It's nice for you to keep this section alive while practicing too. GJ mate, keep going :)

 

Btw, gz = gratz = congratulations.

Oh ty now i get it :P

Thanks an4rchy ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..