Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, Mobius said:

If anything does not work properly, is because it is inherited like that from a parent project.

 

You better start using retail videos as a reference, instead of misinterpreting what OFF files actually do.

These two statements directly contradict each other.

 

The issue with l2j is that it doesn't serialize the game logic, like anywhere at all. Movement = completely isolated from the rest of the game logic and working on its own with no ability to get returned value guarantees between two method calls; HP/MP/CP = fully concurrent getters/setters, same about inventory and so on and on and on.

So obviously, you cannot just take code from retail 'as is' (which is designed to run on a separate, designated game logic thread which doesn't exist in l2j) - still that doesn't mean the code is wrong or cannot be used. Only the l2j cancer has to be removed/reworked.

 

And yeah, if 50k sequential invocations of getCurrentHp [within a method of an AI script] can return different values, you are fucked no matter if you use l2off code or try to figure out things from playtesting or videos. Just saying.

Posted

DEV|Supreme you changed from L2jMobius to L2jUnity because you are nothing more than an opportunist and

at that time L2jUnity claimed to be the best. Being a fanboy ever since, there is nothing you can say to tickle my ears.

 

*real*savormix you are correct, even if you left something out of the box. You know I am not wrong.

 

I am bored explaining myself on this forum.

Last time I posted detailed information, that conflidicted with L2jUnity, my post was deleted.

And each time I rightfully explain myself, there are more L2jUnity members spamming my thread without consequences.

 

Lock my topic.

I am over with this crap.

Posted (edited)

I mean, not that I have a horse in this race, but the unity guys have proven to be far better developers than you.

If that wasn't the case you (and a lot of other people) wouldn't leech the shit out of them.

Edited by Elfocrash
Posted (edited)

1. How have they proven that? By making hate posts on my thread on how bad I am for over two years?

2. Newsflash! There is no leeching involved with a project, when its authors have shared their code for free.

3. Not only you have no horse. You have no idea on the full L2jMobius story.

 

 

Edited by Mobius
Typo.
Posted
1 minute ago, Mobius said:

*real*savormix you are correct, even if you left something out of the box. You know I am not wrong.

Well, you've got a very bold claim in your signature. And every time blame starts getting shifted, I remember just how glad I am to have moved to tool development rather than serverpack stuff. I mean, I am playing full international Fafurion/SoE build IN ENGLISH for 1.5 months now while Innova/NCwest/GameCoast suck on a hard cock (koreans are "busy" "preparing" their builds - sorry, but this is an epic joke).

 

Back on topic: Personally, I never saw a decent working inzone raid in l2j, since it always ends up being easier (usually) or harder and of a different dynamic than in l2off. Prime examples are Balok and Epic Tauti. REAL Epic Tauti you can defeat either because you have super DPS (and can advance stages before tauti can cast a skill), or by being lucky, because in l2off it can hide skill casts and also cast two skills in parallel (yes, these are long-standing bugs, I'll give you that).

If in L2J you can always see what Epic Tauti is casting, that makes the entire raid just a walk in the park.

 

And sorry, but just watching some Epic Tauti videos will not be enough to make it work the same way.

Posted

People should digest that L2j is an emulator.

We are not the company that made the real thing and we will never be able to read it's actual sources.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Mobius said:

1. How have they proven that? By making hate posts on my thread on how bad I am for over two years?

I've seen your code from the leeched version and I've seen Unity's code from the public version. There is quite the quality difference.

 

17 minutes ago, Mobius said:

2. Newsflash! There is no leeching involved with a project, when its authors have shared their code for free.

Are...are you...joking?

The fact that you are leeching code from a shared project doesn't mean it's not leeching. It's just leeching from a shared project. Nothing wrong with that per se. You are just doing it mainly because you are incapable of coding it on your own.

 

18 minutes ago, Mobius said:

3. Not only you have no horse. You have no idea on the full L2jMobius story.

And, quite frankly, I could not care less either about it.

Posted (edited)

The only thing this topic has proven,

is that there are so many non subscribers with access to my files, but I am the thief.

 

 

Edited by Mobius
How about making your forum template match your editor?
Posted
1 minute ago, Mobius said:

is that there are so many non subscribers with access to my files, but I am the thief.

You took a GNU GLPv3 open source project, privatised it and try to make a profit out of it.

 

You are not a thief. You are an open source license violator, which is equally illegal and punishable.

 

Ofc nobody cares, and neither will I, but it's the truth, so don't try to play the victim. Develop a better DRM if you wanna protect "your work" next time.

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Mobius said:

People should digest that L2j is an emulator.

We are not the company that made the real thing and we will never be able to read it's actual sources.

And yet people emulating PS, PS2 or even software like MS DOS go really far to implement even subtle undocumented features simply to make it work like the real thing. So that you wouldn't fire up an application, work with it like normal, then suddenly you try to use a lesser known feature and BAM, the OS (and/or the application) is dead.

 

In L2 emulators I see so many people who keep talking that l2j is an emulator, yet all they want is to make their own MMO rather than make l2 work (at least comparably).

 

Also, who needs sources when the entire thing is just stuffed with stackguard macros - you know the vast majority of the function inputs and outputs; MSVCRT also makes the C++ collections easy to RE, so what more do you need? Guidance on how to RE the C++ input/output routines?

Edited by *real*savormix
Posted
2 minutes ago, Elfocrash said:

You took a GNU GLPv3 open source project, privatised it and try to make a profit out of it.

 

1. I can prove you wrong.

2. Does that make you feel less of a thief?

Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Mobius said:

1. I can prove you wrong.

2. Does that make you feel less of a thief?

1. No you can't. But even if you try, I won't be here to listen. Just wanted to beat a dead horse a little bit on a Sunday morning.

2. It actually doesn't make me feel like a thief at all. It feels like justice. Oh and btw, I was offered to files in order to work on them. I didn't have any personal interest in them and I deleted them once i finished.

 

Cya

Edited by Elfocrash
Posted
1 hour ago, Mobius said:

DEV|Supreme you changed from L2jMobius to L2jUnity because you are nothing more than an opportunist and

at that time L2jUnity claimed to be the best. Being a fanboy ever since, there is nothing you can say to tickle my ears.

 

(...)

And each time I rightfully explain myself, there are more L2jUnity members spamming my thread without consequences.

 

Lock my topic.

I am over with this crap.

 

Nop im not an opportunist, i have just saw the code from my own eyes and moved to the rightful owners.

I have also tried to help them making the code way better with their reviews and approvals.

 

Im also part of the main team.

 

Does that makes me a fanboy because my goals were achieved?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Hello guys i was wondering , how all new servers are having interlude files with classic client developed how they want i mean l2reborn , l2 ovc ,l2 dex , l2 flauron etc has interlude files with classic client  where they found this client or where to buy who is making those clients i have interlude files already developed i need to addapt classic client to interlude files  but with not all theses extra skills items etc   
    • I ended up sorting a similar mess by working with a team that handled everything from discovery to launch and kept things super clear. Their business website design approach made it easy for me to get a site that actually fit my goals, plus I kept full ownership of everything. The long-term support and simple pricing structure saved me a ton of headaches down the road.
    • Interface sources for P447 (7s update) for Classic/Essence   NWindow + InterfaceClassic + L2Editor + L2ClientDat Mobius + XDat Editor   Download
    • Hey there, welcome to the community – no worries about being new, we all started exactly where you are. Let me break this down based on what you’re trying to achieve with your Interlude‑Classic idea.   What you’re describing is actually a pretty popular concept: basically Interlude gameplay and balance, but with Classic‑style UI and a cleaner overall user experience. A “hybrid client”, not a full chronicle change.   Projects that have done something similar or are worth studying:   Lucera 2 – You’re right about this one. They use a custom client that blends Interlude gameplay with a more modern/Classic‑like interface. Their UI work (inventory, skill bar, lobby, etc.) is a good reference point.   L2J Mobius – Not exactly your target, but it’s very flexible and has a lot of examples of customizations and adaptations between chronicles.   Smaller custom projects – There are (or were) a few hybrid attempts using Interlude server files with heavily modified clients, but most are private or closed‑source, so you mainly get ideas, not ready‑to-use files.   Where the real challenge is (the client side):   What you want is possible, but the heavy lifting is on the client, not the server. The main pain points usually are:   Making sure interface files are compatible between chronicles (UI textures, layouts, systemmsg, etc.).   L2Font and localization edits: titles, chat, system messages – a small mistake here can break visuals or cause weird text issues.   Character selection / lobby screens: if you take them from another chronicle, you have to adapt them carefully so they don’t conflict with Interlude data.   Inventory, status bars and shortcuts: they must still work with Interlude’s item/skill structure and packet format, or you’ll get visual desyncs and client errors.   About multi‑protocol:   You’re correct that multi‑protocol is often used by projects that want to support different client versions or custom blends. In your case, it can help “talk” properly with a customized client while keeping an Interlude base server. It doesn’t magically fix everything, but it gives you more flexibility on how client and server exchange data.   Quick chronicle breakdown (relevant for your idea):   2.0–2.6: Early, simpler mechanics, good base for old‑school vibes.   2.7: More skills and better balance, often used as a base for custom projects.   2.9.5: A “bridge” between old and new, very common choice for hybrid or heavily modded setups.   3.0+: Adds Kamael and systems you said you don’t want, so you’d mainly use it as a reference, not as a direct base.   My honest recommendation:   Start from a solid Interlude base (files you understand and can actually maintain). Interlude still has the most support, tools and community knowledge.   Focus first on UI/interface modifications instead of trying to change core mechanics. Use Lucera‑style clients and similar projects as visual/technical reference.   Consider a multi‑protocol setup only after you’re comfortable with a normal Interlude client; otherwise you’ll just stack complexity.   Join active L2J / client‑mod Discords and forums. There are specific channels for interface, system edits and client reverse‑engineering where people share tips and tools.   What I would avoid at the beginning:   No intentar mezclar tres o cuatro chronicles a la vez; con uno bien entendido + UI custom ya tienes más que suficiente trabajo.   No subestimar la parte de cliente; muchas veces es más complicada y más frágil que el lado del servidor.   No saltarte el testeo en entorno local; los híbridos rompen cosas pequeñas (tooltips raros, skills que crashean el cliente, UI bugueada) si no pruebas bien.   Resources worth checking:   L2J forums and old MaxCheaters threads about faction/hybrid servers and client mods.   GitHub repos with client tools and interface mods (even si no son exactamente tu chronicle, te sirven como ejemplo).   Discord communities focused on L2 client development; ahí es donde se mueve hoy la parte “seria” del modding.   The good news: what you want is achievable, just not “plug & play”. It will require patience, testing and a bit of learning on both server and client sides. If you share exactly which files/pack you’re planning to use and what you want your UI to look like, people here (me included) can give you more concrete, step‑by‑step advice.
    • I’m done with Lineage 2. Not because I “grew up”, not because I “don’t have time for games” anymore, but because this game has slowly turned into everything it was supposed to be against.   Let’s be honest: most people are not playing Lineage 2 anymore. They are running 5–10 boxes, macros and scripts, setting up their characters and going to watch Netflix. The core loop isn’t PvP, clan wars or raids – it’s AFK grinding and praying your gear upgrades don’t fail.   The game used to be about outplaying your enemy with positioning, timing and coordination. Now it’s about:   Who has more boxes logged in.   Who is willing to swipe the credit card harder.   Who abuses the most broken script, cheat or exploit before it gets “patched”.   And let’s talk about pay‑to‑win. You can pretend it’s “supporting the server” all you want, but when someone can buy power that takes others months (or is literally impossible) to reach, that’s not support, that’s buying victories. When top players are just walking credit cards with epics, donations and event gear, you don’t have competition, you have a spending contest.   The community? It’s just as bad. Most “friends” are temporary party members until they find a better CP, clan or donation package. Drama, backstabbing, ninja looting, clan leaders selling clan resources, spies in Discord – it’s more like a cheap political simulator than an MMO. People talk about “honor” and “fair play”, then log their 10th box, run radar and target through walls.   And private servers… So many promises: “long‑term project”, “no corruption”, “no over‑enchant items”, “balanced gameplay”. Then after a few weeks you see:   Admin friends with full gear “testing”.   Hidden donations or “special offers” for “supporters”.   GMs closing their eyes to obvious abuse because it’s their buddies or biggest donors. Every wipe and every “fresh start” is just another cycle of the same lie, and we all pretend “this time will be different”.   The saddest part? Most of us know all this and still keep coming back because Lineage 2 has an insane core – the world, the classes, the adrenaline of real PvP, the politics, the sieges. But that core is buried under layers of greed, abuse, bots, scripts, egos and fake promises.   So here is the brutal truth: Lineage 2 is not a hardcore competitive MMORPG anymore. It’s a casino disguised as nostalgia, kept alive by whales, box armies and people too addicted or too hopeful to finally let go.   If you’re still playing, ask yourself honestly: Are you having fun, or are you just grinding, coping and praying that “next server” will finally be the one that isn’t corrupt, pay‑to‑win or dead in three months?   For me, I’m out. Flame me, defend the game, call me salty – I don’t care. But deep down, most of you know I’m not lying.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..