Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ah, missed this topic.

 

Well im pretty much sleep depraved(slept like 2h in total, fairly) so bare with me, I did say i help them, and i am. Since Boorinio promissed me the pack will be free forever, and will never go backwards from open source. I could go on and rant about paid projects, or the statement "oh man im losing so much time working on this pack, at least 10 bucks per # commits is fair!"; Bull shit get a fucking day job, i dont see l2jserver or linux guys going backwords from open source cus "their losing time". Pointless living ppl.

 

Anyway, since i cant seem to control myself from ranting, ima say that: I am helping them, i will manage the "retail" features of the back, but this pack will stay a custom pack i think, i have some plans for plugin extensions and entity systems and stuff, but actually compliting them wont be too quick, since i gotta open my server archid empire, for starters and ofc my other work related projects (that some of them made open source, like my Deferred Shading system).. Yeah deviating again..

 

Yeah so after i get more free time, ima start stripping off a lot of stuff XD and add my archid private stuff.

 

No offense mate, but you must proof it's worth it to get stickied... aCis passed a lot of huuuge commits before getting stickied :P

Your kinda wrong.. but i wont get into that

Posted

I understand what you mean, but it's a fact that Tryskell did a great job.

What this has to do with Tryskell?

Posted

What this has to do with Tryskell?

:P

 

I just said to Boorinio that he needs to work a lot and show activity in order to get stickied, like aCis did. Anyway.

Posted

Lets hope it will last for a long period of time, some quality competition between current interlude project would be nice to see.

Posted

Lets hope it will last for a long period of time, some quality competition between current interlude project would be nice to see.

I hope it too matim! At least for now there are many plans for the feature so....

Posted

Lets hope it will last for a long period of time, some quality competition between current interlude project would be nice to see.

Oh, i didnt know you cared.

Posted

Why interlude =/

Because that's the client that i like and i had never worked or played a newer version of l2 than interlude.And most of the ppl i know too..

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • <dailyReward days="28" autoOpen="true" minimumOnlineTimeSeconds="30" oneRewardPerIP="true" resetIfMissDay="true">   For now, I have these settings in the XML—this is the V1 version I created, though I plan to make further improvements over time. Of course, I’ll also add more protections—MAC, HWID, and perhaps others like account-based restrictions—to make it more secure. We can also implement non-tradable items to further enhance the system's security. I’ll keep posting updates and refining both the system and the interface. I might make a video tomorrow; if you look at the top, you'll see the "auto-open" feature can be toggled on or off, allowing users to rely solely on the `.daily` command. Cheers! Note: If I sell it in this state, I’ll provide support and roll out updates to users. I’m not forcing anyone to buy anything; I’d even provide the patch files so that anyone with the necessary skills can add features, modify it, or improve it further.
    • If the problem is that the target is lost, the action of aiming at another character, upon losing collision, does not allow aiming.   This one works as it should, allowing you to target characters
    • MICROTEXT AND WATERMARKS BREAK MOST RENDERINGS Microtext and watermarks aren’t just small decorative details. They are one of the most common reasons a document fails verification, even when it looks decent at first glance. The issue is that these elements are almost impossible to reproduce “by eye.” Microtext requires precise geometry and legibility at a very small size, while a watermark needs the correct density, transparency, and accurate placement relative to other security features. Any deviation becomes obvious during detailed inspection. ▪ What’s most often done wrong: - microtext is drawn too thick or blurry - the watermark is made either too visible or almost invisible - the positioning between microtext and watermark is ignored - the original printing technology isn’t taken into account when choosing density and shape - The stronger the document’s security features, the less room there is for approximation. What matters here isn’t visual similarity, but accurate reproduction of the original technical characteristics. If your document contains microtext and watermarks, this is always an area that requires extra attention. Write to us in DMs. We’ll review your case and point out exactly which details need the highest precision during rendering. › TG: @mustang_service_ms ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service_ms ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +JPpJCETg-xM1NjNl ) #drawing #microtext #photoshop #editing #watermarks
    • GoldRush launches tomorrow! July 18 16:00 GMT+3 Europe / International Register your account in the website, connect wallet and be ready to dominate!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..