Jump to content

c4 l2off rates x?  

98 members have voted

  1. 1. c4 l2off rates x?

    • x70
      52
    • x150
      14
    • x500
      32


Recommended Posts

Posted

//agree

even better if it is C3 .. i am a C3 Lover .. it means a C4 HATER :@ anyway .. i voted for x500 GL :D

 

Nobody wants c3, c4 is fine.

Posted

//agree

even better if it is C3 .. i am a C3 Lover .. it means a C4 HATER :@ anyway .. i voted for x500 GL :D

 

Nobody wants c3, c4 is fine.

Posted

Do something unique , try Hellbound x100 / x150 , retail , no customs

C4 is old but good , IL is boring , Freya is science fiction sh1t game... Do Hellbound its unique and a bit special..and the most balanced of all chronicles !!!

Cheers.

Posted

x500 PVP server Non Custom... will be fine!

 

With enchant rates:

 

+4 Safe

+20 Max

 

80% Enchant Rates Normal Scrolls

100% Enchant Rates with Blessed Scrolls

 

Will be Rox Server ;)

 

And Client : Interlude ofcourse ;)

Posted

A mid-high rate would be just awesome,making a C4 low rate needs many people plus it's boring

Well,the guys that will join to a c4 server want to remember the old times.

So at the old times i guess they were playing low rate,right?

That's why i said it :P

Posted

C4 will fail in some months...waste of time

C6 will die cuz its sh1t boring

Do something special , NOT LOL FREYA

Do Hellbound , ballanced and interesting beside lol c4 and lol c6

^^

Cheers !

Posted

Well my poor opinion is FREYA ....!

 

IF the staff of a FREYA server is pro can make better balance than c6/c4

 

I am bored on this ST@PID graphics  interlude has....! So Freya is the best client for me....!

 

First Servers on all VOTE SITES = GRACIA (and that because people need sth new....) :S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • LIVE VERIFICATION? SUMSUB? “IMPOSSIBLE”? ▪ Spoiler: it is possible — if you know who to work with. A client came in with a task to pass **live verification** on **WantToPay**, a Telegram virtual card service. On the platform side — **Sumsub**: liveness check, SMS, manual review. “Fast” and “by eye” simply don’t work here. › What was done: → analyzed the verification scenario and Sumsub requirements → built the correct flow: phone number, email, timing → **completed live verification remotely, without account handover** → handled SMS and confirmation codes → brought the process to final approval ▪ Result: → verification passed → access granted → no flags or repeat requests ▪ Live verification is not luck. It’s scenario-based preparation — not hope. › TG: @mustang_service ( https:// t.me/ mustang_service ) › Channel: Mustang Service ( https:// t.me/ +6RAKokIn5ItmYjEx ) *All data is published with the client’s consent.* #verification #sumsub #livecheck #kyc #case
    • IMPORTANT INFO: In a few days, I will switch to completely new code, written from scratch with a new download system, patch building and management system. The Updater will become true 2026 code with "foolproof systems". I'm going to create a Discord server for customers to request new ideas and features. FIRST CUSTOMERS ARE ALREADY USING THE NEW UPDATER ON LIVE SERVERS! Watch this topic for upcoming info because the new updater is around the corner! Yes, you can still use self-update on the previous updater! No, the new updater won't be compatible with the old patch system! A new build is required, but players who already have game files won't have to download the entire patch again! New templates and updates to existing templates are coming soon! Sneak peek:  
    • i used guytis IL project and source. i found in his project there are 3 Client version source... 1,CliExt_H5   --->this one cant be compiled in VS2005,i did know why..is it for H5 client? 2,CliExtNew  --->this one is IL version ,but when i compiled it and use it.player cant login game,MD5Checksum wrong.i check the source code,but not found any hints. 3,L2Server    --->this one for HB client?im not sure...   so my question is what are the differences between these three versions of cliext.dll?how can i fix the issue of the MD5Checksum not matching problem?   01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [CCliExt::HandleCheckSum] Invalid Checksum[1130415144] vs [-721420287] packet[dd] len[29] sum[2698] key[30] HWID[] Account[]! 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, SocketLimiter::UserSocketBadunknownprotocol 11111111111 01/29/2026 21:04:11.366, [usersocket]unknown protocol from ip[113.137.149.115]!      
    • ## [1.4.1] - 2026-01-29   ### ✨ New Features - **Short Description**: Server owners can add a short tagline (up to 240 characters) on the server info page, under the "Online" status. It appears in the server list (By Votes) for VIP, Gold VIP, and Pinned servers so players see a brief summary at a glance.   ### 🔄 Improvements - **Server Info Page**: Description field is limited to 3000 characters with a character counter; the textarea is vertically resizable. A second **Save Changes** button was added at the bottom (after the description) for easier saving. - **Server Name**: In My Servers → Edit, the server name is read-only and can no longer be changed (avoids accidental changes and naming conflicts). - **Server Rows (By Votes)**: Short descriptions wrap correctly and no longer affect row height; long text is clipped to two lines so the list stays tidy and consistent.   ---
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This community uses essential cookies to function properly. Non-essential cookies and third-party services are used only with your consent. Read our Privacy Policy and We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue..